Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bruzaroski, Samera R
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Trento, Italo B, Rezende, Sarah, Pereira, Flavia AB, Botaro, Bruno G, Sifuentes dos Santos, Joice, Ludovico, Agostinho, Santana, Elsa H W
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
DOI: 10.14393/BJ-v33n2-34114
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/34114
Resumo: Thresholds for Somatic Cell Counts (SCC) and Total Bacterial Counts (TBC) in refrigerated raw milk have been stricter in Brazil since July 2014. We evaluated whether the composition of 11,051 milk samples delivered to processing plants in Paraná state, Brazil, by cooperative dairy farms, complies with government requirements and established changes. Milk quality was evaluated from June to August 2014, from dairy farms in three states. Data were obtained by infrared spectroscopy and flow cytometry. SCC was highest in June (p<0.05), when the highest number of samples and mean values was observed that did not comply with legal standards. No samples obtained in July complied with the requirements. The city in Mato Grosso do Sul state was the only one that met the legal requirements throughout the period studied. TBC did not vary (p>0.05) in the trimester, and none of the cities presented values below the maximum TBC allowed. Protein, fat and non-fat solids obtained complied with legal requirements. Total solids and lactose varied among the months (p<0.05), with highest values for total solids in June and for lactose in August. Milk samples did not comply with minimal requirements for SCC and TBC, and were not adjusted to more rigid quality standards. 
id UFU-14_237325c6e034fef146a31d1c4ad9cd1a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/34114
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
spelling Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil Adequação aos padrões legais de leite entregue para beneficiamento no BrasilTBCSCCcompositionregulationqualityCBTCCSCompisiçãoRegulamentaçãoQualidadeThresholds for Somatic Cell Counts (SCC) and Total Bacterial Counts (TBC) in refrigerated raw milk have been stricter in Brazil since July 2014. We evaluated whether the composition of 11,051 milk samples delivered to processing plants in Paraná state, Brazil, by cooperative dairy farms, complies with government requirements and established changes. Milk quality was evaluated from June to August 2014, from dairy farms in three states. Data were obtained by infrared spectroscopy and flow cytometry. SCC was highest in June (p<0.05), when the highest number of samples and mean values was observed that did not comply with legal standards. No samples obtained in July complied with the requirements. The city in Mato Grosso do Sul state was the only one that met the legal requirements throughout the period studied. TBC did not vary (p>0.05) in the trimester, and none of the cities presented values below the maximum TBC allowed. Protein, fat and non-fat solids obtained complied with legal requirements. Total solids and lactose varied among the months (p<0.05), with highest values for total solids in June and for lactose in August. Milk samples did not comply with minimal requirements for SCC and TBC, and were not adjusted to more rigid quality standards. Limites de contagem de células somáticas (CCS) e contagem bacteriana total (CBT) em leite cru refrigerado estão mais estritos no Brasil desde Julho de 2014. Foram avaliadas 11051 amostras de leite entregues para beneficiamento no Estado do Paraná, Brasil, por produtores de leite e cooperados e verificou-se se estas atendiam aos requisitos governamentais e às mudanças estabelecidas. A qualidade do leite foi avaliada de Junho a Agosto de 2014 em fazendas leiteiras de três estados. Os dados foram obtidos por espectroscopia em infravermelho e citometria de fluxo. CCS foi superior em Junho (p<0,05), quando foi observado maior número de amostras e valores médios que não estavam de acordo com os padrões legais. A cidade do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul foi a única que cumpriu com os limites legais requeridos ao longo do período. CBT não apresentou variação (p>0,05) ao longo do trimestre, e nenhuma das cidades apresentou valores dentro do limite estabelecido para CBT. Proteína, gordura e sólidos não gordurosos estavam de acordo com os limites requeridos. Sólidos totais e lactose variaram ao longo dos meses (p<0,05), com valores elevados para sólidos totais em Junho e para lactose em Agosto. Amostras de leite não estavam de acordo com os requisitos mínimos de CCS e CBT, e não estão ajustadas aos padrões de qualidade mais rígidos.EDUFU2017-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3411410.14393/BJ-v33n2-34114Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017): Mar./Apr.Bioscience Journal ; v. 33 n. 2 (2017): Mar./Apr.1981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/34114/20003Bruzaroski, Samera RTrento, Italo BRezende, SarahPereira, Flavia ABBotaro, Bruno GSifuentes dos Santos, JoiceLudovico, AgostinhoSantana, Elsa H Winfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-31T22:12:06Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/34114Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2021-05-31T22:12:06Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil
Adequação aos padrões legais de leite entregue para beneficiamento no Brasil
title Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil
spellingShingle Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil
Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil
Bruzaroski, Samera R
TBC
SCC
composition
regulation
quality
CBT
CCS
Compisição
Regulamentação
Qualidade
Bruzaroski, Samera R
TBC
SCC
composition
regulation
quality
CBT
CCS
Compisição
Regulamentação
Qualidade
title_short Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil
title_full Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil
title_fullStr Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil
Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil
Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil
title_sort Legal standards of milk delivered for processing in Brazil
author Bruzaroski, Samera R
author_facet Bruzaroski, Samera R
Bruzaroski, Samera R
Trento, Italo B
Rezende, Sarah
Pereira, Flavia AB
Botaro, Bruno G
Sifuentes dos Santos, Joice
Ludovico, Agostinho
Santana, Elsa H W
Trento, Italo B
Rezende, Sarah
Pereira, Flavia AB
Botaro, Bruno G
Sifuentes dos Santos, Joice
Ludovico, Agostinho
Santana, Elsa H W
author_role author
author2 Trento, Italo B
Rezende, Sarah
Pereira, Flavia AB
Botaro, Bruno G
Sifuentes dos Santos, Joice
Ludovico, Agostinho
Santana, Elsa H W
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bruzaroski, Samera R
Trento, Italo B
Rezende, Sarah
Pereira, Flavia AB
Botaro, Bruno G
Sifuentes dos Santos, Joice
Ludovico, Agostinho
Santana, Elsa H W
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv TBC
SCC
composition
regulation
quality
CBT
CCS
Compisição
Regulamentação
Qualidade
topic TBC
SCC
composition
regulation
quality
CBT
CCS
Compisição
Regulamentação
Qualidade
description Thresholds for Somatic Cell Counts (SCC) and Total Bacterial Counts (TBC) in refrigerated raw milk have been stricter in Brazil since July 2014. We evaluated whether the composition of 11,051 milk samples delivered to processing plants in Paraná state, Brazil, by cooperative dairy farms, complies with government requirements and established changes. Milk quality was evaluated from June to August 2014, from dairy farms in three states. Data were obtained by infrared spectroscopy and flow cytometry. SCC was highest in June (p<0.05), when the highest number of samples and mean values was observed that did not comply with legal standards. No samples obtained in July complied with the requirements. The city in Mato Grosso do Sul state was the only one that met the legal requirements throughout the period studied. TBC did not vary (p>0.05) in the trimester, and none of the cities presented values below the maximum TBC allowed. Protein, fat and non-fat solids obtained complied with legal requirements. Total solids and lactose varied among the months (p<0.05), with highest values for total solids in June and for lactose in August. Milk samples did not comply with minimal requirements for SCC and TBC, and were not adjusted to more rigid quality standards. 
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/34114
10.14393/BJ-v33n2-34114
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/34114
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v33n2-34114
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/34114/20003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017): Mar./Apr.
Bioscience Journal ; v. 33 n. 2 (2017): Mar./Apr.
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1822179644779003904
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v33n2-34114