Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Silva, Kelly da, Paranhos, Luiz Renato, Baldrighi, Sílvia Elaine Zuim de Moraes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31149
Resumo: The aim of this study was to compare the perception of the parents about the quality of life of children and adolescents with and without difficulties of nasal route use. The Protocols of Quality of Life of Oral Breathing Children and MBGR (subitems Clinical History and Breathing) were applied to 64 families with and without complaints about mouth breathing. The sample consisted of subjects aged between five and sixteen years old and was divided into two groups: Control Group (CG - 32 subjects, average age 9.78 ± 2.71), with the possibility of nasal route use with time equal or less than two minutes and Experimental Group (GE - 32 subjects, average age: 9.59 years), with the possibility of nasal use for less than two minutes. The possibility of the nasal use was evaluated with the use of a timer, requiring the maintenance of a small amount of water in the mouth for, at least, two minutes. If the subject remained unquiet or swallowed before the stipulated time, it was carried with retest for two more attempts, to ensure the obtained results. ANOVA test was applied, considering p value of 5% was. There were no significant statistically differences between the studied groups (p>0,05). It can be concluded that despite the complaints related to the breathing mode of children and adolescents with familiar complaints about mouth breathing, these do not seem to have interfered directly in the quality of life, according to the Protocol used.
id UFU-14_320a91f3ff6223d960e05352609ba375
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/31149
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties Quality of LifeMouth BreathingSickness Impact Profile.HealThe aim of this study was to compare the perception of the parents about the quality of life of children and adolescents with and without difficulties of nasal route use. The Protocols of Quality of Life of Oral Breathing Children and MBGR (subitems Clinical History and Breathing) were applied to 64 families with and without complaints about mouth breathing. The sample consisted of subjects aged between five and sixteen years old and was divided into two groups: Control Group (CG - 32 subjects, average age 9.78 ± 2.71), with the possibility of nasal route use with time equal or less than two minutes and Experimental Group (GE - 32 subjects, average age: 9.59 years), with the possibility of nasal use for less than two minutes. The possibility of the nasal use was evaluated with the use of a timer, requiring the maintenance of a small amount of water in the mouth for, at least, two minutes. If the subject remained unquiet or swallowed before the stipulated time, it was carried with retest for two more attempts, to ensure the obtained results. ANOVA test was applied, considering p value of 5% was. There were no significant statistically differences between the studied groups (p>0,05). It can be concluded that despite the complaints related to the breathing mode of children and adolescents with familiar complaints about mouth breathing, these do not seem to have interfered directly in the quality of life, according to the Protocol used.The aim of this study was to compare the perception of the parents about the quality of life of children and adolescents with and without difficulties of nasal route use. The Protocols of Quality of Life of Oral Breathing Children and MBGR (subitems Clinical History and Breathing) were applied to 64 families with and without complaints about mouth breathing. The sample consisted of subjects aged between five and sixteen years old and was divided into two groups: Control Group (CG - 32 subjects, average age 9.78 ± 2.71), with the possibility of nasal route use with time equal or less than two minutes and Experimental Group (GE - 32 subjects, average age: 9.59 years), with the possibility of nasal use for less than two minutes. The possibility of the nasal use was evaluated with the use of a timer, requiring the maintenance of a small amount of water in the mouth for, at least, two minutes. If the subject remained unquiet or swallowed before the stipulated time, it was carried with retest for two more attempts, to ensure the obtained results. ANOVA test was applied, considering p value of 5% was. There were no significant statistically differences between the studied groups (p>0,05). It can be concluded that despite the complaints related to the breathing mode of children and adolescents with familiar complaints about mouth breathing, these do not seem to have interfered directly in the quality of life, according to the Protocol used.EDUFU2016-01-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3114910.14393/BJ-v32n1a2016-31149Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016): Jan./Feb.; 272-278Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 1 (2016): Jan./Feb.; 272-2781981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31149/17782Brasil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2016 Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves Ribeiro César, Kelly da Silva, Luiz Renato Paranhos, Sílvia Elaine Zuim de Moraes Baldrighihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez AlvesSilva, Kelly daParanhos, Luiz RenatoBaldrighi, Sílvia Elaine Zuim de Moraes2022-05-24T18:18:47Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/31149Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-24T18:18:47Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties
Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties
title Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties
spellingShingle Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties
Ribeiro César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves
Quality of Life
Mouth Breathing
Sickness Impact Profile.
Heal
title_short Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties
title_full Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties
title_fullStr Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties
title_full_unstemmed Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties
title_sort Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties
author Ribeiro César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves
author_facet Ribeiro César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves
Silva, Kelly da
Paranhos, Luiz Renato
Baldrighi, Sílvia Elaine Zuim de Moraes
author_role author
author2 Silva, Kelly da
Paranhos, Luiz Renato
Baldrighi, Sílvia Elaine Zuim de Moraes
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves
Silva, Kelly da
Paranhos, Luiz Renato
Baldrighi, Sílvia Elaine Zuim de Moraes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Quality of Life
Mouth Breathing
Sickness Impact Profile.
Heal
topic Quality of Life
Mouth Breathing
Sickness Impact Profile.
Heal
description The aim of this study was to compare the perception of the parents about the quality of life of children and adolescents with and without difficulties of nasal route use. The Protocols of Quality of Life of Oral Breathing Children and MBGR (subitems Clinical History and Breathing) were applied to 64 families with and without complaints about mouth breathing. The sample consisted of subjects aged between five and sixteen years old and was divided into two groups: Control Group (CG - 32 subjects, average age 9.78 ± 2.71), with the possibility of nasal route use with time equal or less than two minutes and Experimental Group (GE - 32 subjects, average age: 9.59 years), with the possibility of nasal use for less than two minutes. The possibility of the nasal use was evaluated with the use of a timer, requiring the maintenance of a small amount of water in the mouth for, at least, two minutes. If the subject remained unquiet or swallowed before the stipulated time, it was carried with retest for two more attempts, to ensure the obtained results. ANOVA test was applied, considering p value of 5% was. There were no significant statistically differences between the studied groups (p>0,05). It can be concluded that despite the complaints related to the breathing mode of children and adolescents with familiar complaints about mouth breathing, these do not seem to have interfered directly in the quality of life, according to the Protocol used.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31149
10.14393/BJ-v32n1a2016-31149
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31149
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v32n1a2016-31149
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31149/17782
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brasil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016): Jan./Feb.; 272-278
Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 1 (2016): Jan./Feb.; 272-278
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069075925434368