Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31149 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to compare the perception of the parents about the quality of life of children and adolescents with and without difficulties of nasal route use. The Protocols of Quality of Life of Oral Breathing Children and MBGR (subitems Clinical History and Breathing) were applied to 64 families with and without complaints about mouth breathing. The sample consisted of subjects aged between five and sixteen years old and was divided into two groups: Control Group (CG - 32 subjects, average age 9.78 ± 2.71), with the possibility of nasal route use with time equal or less than two minutes and Experimental Group (GE - 32 subjects, average age: 9.59 years), with the possibility of nasal use for less than two minutes. The possibility of the nasal use was evaluated with the use of a timer, requiring the maintenance of a small amount of water in the mouth for, at least, two minutes. If the subject remained unquiet or swallowed before the stipulated time, it was carried with retest for two more attempts, to ensure the obtained results. ANOVA test was applied, considering p value of 5% was. There were no significant statistically differences between the studied groups (p>0,05). It can be concluded that despite the complaints related to the breathing mode of children and adolescents with familiar complaints about mouth breathing, these do not seem to have interfered directly in the quality of life, according to the Protocol used. |
id |
UFU-14_320a91f3ff6223d960e05352609ba375 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/31149 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties Quality of LifeMouth BreathingSickness Impact Profile.HealThe aim of this study was to compare the perception of the parents about the quality of life of children and adolescents with and without difficulties of nasal route use. The Protocols of Quality of Life of Oral Breathing Children and MBGR (subitems Clinical History and Breathing) were applied to 64 families with and without complaints about mouth breathing. The sample consisted of subjects aged between five and sixteen years old and was divided into two groups: Control Group (CG - 32 subjects, average age 9.78 ± 2.71), with the possibility of nasal route use with time equal or less than two minutes and Experimental Group (GE - 32 subjects, average age: 9.59 years), with the possibility of nasal use for less than two minutes. The possibility of the nasal use was evaluated with the use of a timer, requiring the maintenance of a small amount of water in the mouth for, at least, two minutes. If the subject remained unquiet or swallowed before the stipulated time, it was carried with retest for two more attempts, to ensure the obtained results. ANOVA test was applied, considering p value of 5% was. There were no significant statistically differences between the studied groups (p>0,05). It can be concluded that despite the complaints related to the breathing mode of children and adolescents with familiar complaints about mouth breathing, these do not seem to have interfered directly in the quality of life, according to the Protocol used.The aim of this study was to compare the perception of the parents about the quality of life of children and adolescents with and without difficulties of nasal route use. The Protocols of Quality of Life of Oral Breathing Children and MBGR (subitems Clinical History and Breathing) were applied to 64 families with and without complaints about mouth breathing. The sample consisted of subjects aged between five and sixteen years old and was divided into two groups: Control Group (CG - 32 subjects, average age 9.78 ± 2.71), with the possibility of nasal route use with time equal or less than two minutes and Experimental Group (GE - 32 subjects, average age: 9.59 years), with the possibility of nasal use for less than two minutes. The possibility of the nasal use was evaluated with the use of a timer, requiring the maintenance of a small amount of water in the mouth for, at least, two minutes. If the subject remained unquiet or swallowed before the stipulated time, it was carried with retest for two more attempts, to ensure the obtained results. ANOVA test was applied, considering p value of 5% was. There were no significant statistically differences between the studied groups (p>0,05). It can be concluded that despite the complaints related to the breathing mode of children and adolescents with familiar complaints about mouth breathing, these do not seem to have interfered directly in the quality of life, according to the Protocol used.EDUFU2016-01-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3114910.14393/BJ-v32n1a2016-31149Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016): Jan./Feb.; 272-278Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 1 (2016): Jan./Feb.; 272-2781981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31149/17782Brasil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2016 Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves Ribeiro César, Kelly da Silva, Luiz Renato Paranhos, Sílvia Elaine Zuim de Moraes Baldrighihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez AlvesSilva, Kelly daParanhos, Luiz RenatoBaldrighi, Sílvia Elaine Zuim de Moraes2022-05-24T18:18:47Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/31149Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-24T18:18:47Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties |
title |
Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties |
spellingShingle |
Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties Ribeiro César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves Quality of Life Mouth Breathing Sickness Impact Profile. Heal |
title_short |
Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties |
title_full |
Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties |
title_fullStr |
Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties |
title_sort |
Quality of life of subjects with and without nose breathing difficulties |
author |
Ribeiro César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves |
author_facet |
Ribeiro César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves Silva, Kelly da Paranhos, Luiz Renato Baldrighi, Sílvia Elaine Zuim de Moraes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Kelly da Paranhos, Luiz Renato Baldrighi, Sílvia Elaine Zuim de Moraes |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves Silva, Kelly da Paranhos, Luiz Renato Baldrighi, Sílvia Elaine Zuim de Moraes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Quality of Life Mouth Breathing Sickness Impact Profile. Heal |
topic |
Quality of Life Mouth Breathing Sickness Impact Profile. Heal |
description |
The aim of this study was to compare the perception of the parents about the quality of life of children and adolescents with and without difficulties of nasal route use. The Protocols of Quality of Life of Oral Breathing Children and MBGR (subitems Clinical History and Breathing) were applied to 64 families with and without complaints about mouth breathing. The sample consisted of subjects aged between five and sixteen years old and was divided into two groups: Control Group (CG - 32 subjects, average age 9.78 ± 2.71), with the possibility of nasal route use with time equal or less than two minutes and Experimental Group (GE - 32 subjects, average age: 9.59 years), with the possibility of nasal use for less than two minutes. The possibility of the nasal use was evaluated with the use of a timer, requiring the maintenance of a small amount of water in the mouth for, at least, two minutes. If the subject remained unquiet or swallowed before the stipulated time, it was carried with retest for two more attempts, to ensure the obtained results. ANOVA test was applied, considering p value of 5% was. There were no significant statistically differences between the studied groups (p>0,05). It can be concluded that despite the complaints related to the breathing mode of children and adolescents with familiar complaints about mouth breathing, these do not seem to have interfered directly in the quality of life, according to the Protocol used. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31149 10.14393/BJ-v32n1a2016-31149 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31149 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v32n1a2016-31149 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31149/17782 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brasil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016): Jan./Feb.; 272-278 Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 1 (2016): Jan./Feb.; 272-278 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069075925434368 |