Application methods of biostimulants affect the production and postharvest conservation of yellow melon

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Góes, Glêidson Bezerra de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Vilvert, João Claudio, Araújo, Nícolas Oliveira de, Medeiros, José Francismar de, Aroucha, Edna Maria Mendes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/53682
Resumo: Worldwide, Brazil holds the fifth position in melon fruits exportation, further expanding its products to provide for the growing demand. This expansion is the result of the development and application of new technologies, including the management of the use of biostimulants. However, for melon crops, the information in the literature on the use of biostimulants remains limited to the effects of different doses on fruit quality at the time of harvest. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of different methods of pre-harvest application of two biostimulants on the production and postharvest conservation of fruits of yellow melon cv. Iracema. The treatments consisted of a combination of three factors: two plant biostimulants (Crop Set® and Spray Dunger®), two application methods of the products (fertigation and spraying), and five times of postharvest storage (0, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days). An additional control treatment corresponded to plants without biostimulant application. The fruits were evaluated for production and physicochemical attributes: average mass, yield, flesh firmness, titratable acidity, soluble solids content, SSC/TA ratio, pH, total soluble sugars, and weight loss. Fertigation is the recommended application method of biostimulants for yellow melon due to its effect on the increase of average mass, yield, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, and total soluble sugars of the fruits in relation to the spraying method.
id UFU-14_32bba4e8d75e84f4cee20a2d594539b2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/53682
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Application methods of biostimulants affect the production and postharvest conservation of yellow melonO método de aplicação de bioestimulantes afeta a produção e a conservação pós-colheita de melão amareloCucumis melo L.Plant growth regulatorsPostharvest qualityStorage conditionsAgricultural SciencesWorldwide, Brazil holds the fifth position in melon fruits exportation, further expanding its products to provide for the growing demand. This expansion is the result of the development and application of new technologies, including the management of the use of biostimulants. However, for melon crops, the information in the literature on the use of biostimulants remains limited to the effects of different doses on fruit quality at the time of harvest. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of different methods of pre-harvest application of two biostimulants on the production and postharvest conservation of fruits of yellow melon cv. Iracema. The treatments consisted of a combination of three factors: two plant biostimulants (Crop Set® and Spray Dunger®), two application methods of the products (fertigation and spraying), and five times of postharvest storage (0, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days). An additional control treatment corresponded to plants without biostimulant application. The fruits were evaluated for production and physicochemical attributes: average mass, yield, flesh firmness, titratable acidity, soluble solids content, SSC/TA ratio, pH, total soluble sugars, and weight loss. Fertigation is the recommended application method of biostimulants for yellow melon due to its effect on the increase of average mass, yield, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, and total soluble sugars of the fruits in relation to the spraying method.Mundialmente, o Brasil ocupa a quinta posição na exportação de frutos de melão, expandindo ainda mais sua produtividade para atender a crescente demanda. Essa expansão é resultado do desenvolvimento e aplicação de novas tecnologias e técnicas de manejo. Dentre as técnicas de manejo para a cultura do melão que vêm sendo estudadas, estão o uso de bioestimulantes. Apesar dos benefícios dos bioestimulantes na qualidade dos frutos, as pesquisas com esses produtos informam o seu efeito quando aplicados em diferentes doses somente no momento da colheita. O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a influência de diferentes métodos de aplicação pré-colheita de dois bioestimulantes na produção e conservação pós-colheita de frutos de melão amarelo cv. Iracema. Os tratamentos consistiram na combinação de três fatores: dois bioestimulantes (Crop Set® e Spray Dunger®), dois métodos de aplicação (fertirrigação e pulverização) e cinco tempos de armazenamento pós-colheita (0, 14, 21, 28 e 35 days). Os frutos foram avaliados pela produção e pelos atributos físico-químicos: massa média, produtividade, firmeza de polpa, acidez titulável, conteúdo de sólidos solúveis, relação SS/AT, pH, açúcares solúveis totais e perda de massa. A fertirrigação é o método de aplicação indicado para ambos os bioestimulantes pelos seus efeitos positivos na massa média, produtividade, firmeza de polpa, conteúdo de sólidos solúveis e açúcares solúveis totais dos frutos em relação à pulverização.EDUFU2021-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/5368210.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-53682Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 37 (2021): Continuous Publication; e37075Bioscience Journal ; v. 37 (2021): Continuous Publication; e370751981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/53682/32914Brazil; Contemporary Copyright (c) 2021 Glêidson Bezerra de Góes, João Claudio Vilvert, Nícolas Oliveira de Araújo, José Francismar de Medeiros, Edna Maria Mendes Arouchahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGóes, Glêidson Bezerra de Vilvert, João ClaudioAraújo, Nícolas Oliveira de Medeiros, José Francismar deAroucha, Edna Maria Mendes2022-05-25T13:22:02Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/53682Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-25T13:22:02Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Application methods of biostimulants affect the production and postharvest conservation of yellow melon
O método de aplicação de bioestimulantes afeta a produção e a conservação pós-colheita de melão amarelo
title Application methods of biostimulants affect the production and postharvest conservation of yellow melon
spellingShingle Application methods of biostimulants affect the production and postharvest conservation of yellow melon
Góes, Glêidson Bezerra de
Cucumis melo L.
Plant growth regulators
Postharvest quality
Storage conditions
Agricultural Sciences
title_short Application methods of biostimulants affect the production and postharvest conservation of yellow melon
title_full Application methods of biostimulants affect the production and postharvest conservation of yellow melon
title_fullStr Application methods of biostimulants affect the production and postharvest conservation of yellow melon
title_full_unstemmed Application methods of biostimulants affect the production and postharvest conservation of yellow melon
title_sort Application methods of biostimulants affect the production and postharvest conservation of yellow melon
author Góes, Glêidson Bezerra de
author_facet Góes, Glêidson Bezerra de
Vilvert, João Claudio
Araújo, Nícolas Oliveira de
Medeiros, José Francismar de
Aroucha, Edna Maria Mendes
author_role author
author2 Vilvert, João Claudio
Araújo, Nícolas Oliveira de
Medeiros, José Francismar de
Aroucha, Edna Maria Mendes
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Góes, Glêidson Bezerra de
Vilvert, João Claudio
Araújo, Nícolas Oliveira de
Medeiros, José Francismar de
Aroucha, Edna Maria Mendes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cucumis melo L.
Plant growth regulators
Postharvest quality
Storage conditions
Agricultural Sciences
topic Cucumis melo L.
Plant growth regulators
Postharvest quality
Storage conditions
Agricultural Sciences
description Worldwide, Brazil holds the fifth position in melon fruits exportation, further expanding its products to provide for the growing demand. This expansion is the result of the development and application of new technologies, including the management of the use of biostimulants. However, for melon crops, the information in the literature on the use of biostimulants remains limited to the effects of different doses on fruit quality at the time of harvest. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of different methods of pre-harvest application of two biostimulants on the production and postharvest conservation of fruits of yellow melon cv. Iracema. The treatments consisted of a combination of three factors: two plant biostimulants (Crop Set® and Spray Dunger®), two application methods of the products (fertigation and spraying), and five times of postharvest storage (0, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days). An additional control treatment corresponded to plants without biostimulant application. The fruits were evaluated for production and physicochemical attributes: average mass, yield, flesh firmness, titratable acidity, soluble solids content, SSC/TA ratio, pH, total soluble sugars, and weight loss. Fertigation is the recommended application method of biostimulants for yellow melon due to its effect on the increase of average mass, yield, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, and total soluble sugars of the fruits in relation to the spraying method.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/53682
10.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-53682
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/53682
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-53682
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/53682/32914
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 37 (2021): Continuous Publication; e37075
Bioscience Journal ; v. 37 (2021): Continuous Publication; e37075
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069082448625664

Registros relacionados