Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wutzki, Carlos Rafael
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Jaccoud Filho, David de Souza, Vrisman, Cláudio Maurício, Juliatti, Fernando Cezar, Nascimento, Aguinaldo José do
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/1423-1431
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate different alternative products, foliar sprayed either alone or in combination with fungicide fluazinam, to control white mold in soybean at three locations: Arapoti, Mauá-da-Serra, and Pinhão, in Paraná state, southern Brazil. The following chemical products were used: sodium dichloroisocyanurate, benzalkonium chloride, pyroligneous extract, sodium hypochlorite, cobalt + molybdenum, sucrose, sodium bicarbonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl. Incidence, severity, yield, and number of sclerotia produced were analyzed. The majority of the variables did not follow the normal distribution of the data according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; therefore, the use of non-parametric analysis was necessary. The analysis of all the treatments individually revealed no significant effects so it was decided to separate the analysis into the following groups of treatments: 'control', treatments using alternative products ('alternatives'), treatment only with fungicide ('fungicide') and treatments with alternative products and fungicide ('alternatives + fungicide'). In Arapoti, no significant differences for any variables were observed. In Mauá-da-Serra, the 'fungicide' and 'alternatives + fungicide' had the lowest incidence and number of sclerotia, with higher yield when compared to 'control' and 'alternatives'. No differences were observed for severity. In Pinhão, the 'fungicide' and 'alternatives + fungicide' were superior for incidence, number of sclerotia produced, and yield when compared to the 'control' and 'alternatives'. The 'alternatives + fungicide' showed significantly lower severity when compared to the control, 'alternatives' and 'fungicide' in Pinhão experiment. In conclusion, the alternative products applied in combination with fluazinam resulted in lower severity of white mold in soybean in the experiment conducted in Pinhão, and the application of fluazinam alone or in combination with alternative products, was efficient to control white mold in soybean in locations with high disease incidence. 
id UFU-14_95ee2fbc1004a4116184151a096917d7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/28677
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean Mofo BrancoGlycine max. Produtos domissanitários. Cloro. Indutor de resistência.Agricultural SciencesThe aim of this study was to evaluate different alternative products, foliar sprayed either alone or in combination with fungicide fluazinam, to control white mold in soybean at three locations: Arapoti, Mauá-da-Serra, and Pinhão, in Paraná state, southern Brazil. The following chemical products were used: sodium dichloroisocyanurate, benzalkonium chloride, pyroligneous extract, sodium hypochlorite, cobalt + molybdenum, sucrose, sodium bicarbonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl. Incidence, severity, yield, and number of sclerotia produced were analyzed. The majority of the variables did not follow the normal distribution of the data according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; therefore, the use of non-parametric analysis was necessary. The analysis of all the treatments individually revealed no significant effects so it was decided to separate the analysis into the following groups of treatments: 'control', treatments using alternative products ('alternatives'), treatment only with fungicide ('fungicide') and treatments with alternative products and fungicide ('alternatives + fungicide'). In Arapoti, no significant differences for any variables were observed. In Mauá-da-Serra, the 'fungicide' and 'alternatives + fungicide' had the lowest incidence and number of sclerotia, with higher yield when compared to 'control' and 'alternatives'. No differences were observed for severity. In Pinhão, the 'fungicide' and 'alternatives + fungicide' were superior for incidence, number of sclerotia produced, and yield when compared to the 'control' and 'alternatives'. The 'alternatives + fungicide' showed significantly lower severity when compared to the control, 'alternatives' and 'fungicide' in Pinhão experiment. In conclusion, the alternative products applied in combination with fluazinam resulted in lower severity of white mold in soybean in the experiment conducted in Pinhão, and the application of fluazinam alone or in combination with alternative products, was efficient to control white mold in soybean in locations with high disease incidence. EDUFU2015-09-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/1423-143110.14393/BJ-v31n5a2015-28677Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 31 No. 5 (2015): Sept./Oct.Bioscience Journal ; v. 31 n. 5 (2015): Sept./Oct.1981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/1423-1431/17132Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2015 Carlos Rafael Wutzki, David de Souza Jaccoud Filho, Cláudio Maurício Vrisman, Fernando Cezar Juliatti, Aguinaldo José do Nascimentohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWutzki, Carlos RafaelJaccoud Filho, David de SouzaVrisman, Cláudio MaurícioJuliatti, Fernando CezarNascimento, Aguinaldo José do2022-05-19T14:07:17Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/28677Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-19T14:07:17Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean
title Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean
spellingShingle Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean
Wutzki, Carlos Rafael
Mofo Branco
Glycine max. Produtos domissanitários. Cloro. Indutor de resistência.
Agricultural Sciences
title_short Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean
title_full Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean
title_fullStr Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean
title_full_unstemmed Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean
title_sort Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean
author Wutzki, Carlos Rafael
author_facet Wutzki, Carlos Rafael
Jaccoud Filho, David de Souza
Vrisman, Cláudio Maurício
Juliatti, Fernando Cezar
Nascimento, Aguinaldo José do
author_role author
author2 Jaccoud Filho, David de Souza
Vrisman, Cláudio Maurício
Juliatti, Fernando Cezar
Nascimento, Aguinaldo José do
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wutzki, Carlos Rafael
Jaccoud Filho, David de Souza
Vrisman, Cláudio Maurício
Juliatti, Fernando Cezar
Nascimento, Aguinaldo José do
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mofo Branco
Glycine max. Produtos domissanitários. Cloro. Indutor de resistência.
Agricultural Sciences
topic Mofo Branco
Glycine max. Produtos domissanitários. Cloro. Indutor de resistência.
Agricultural Sciences
description The aim of this study was to evaluate different alternative products, foliar sprayed either alone or in combination with fungicide fluazinam, to control white mold in soybean at three locations: Arapoti, Mauá-da-Serra, and Pinhão, in Paraná state, southern Brazil. The following chemical products were used: sodium dichloroisocyanurate, benzalkonium chloride, pyroligneous extract, sodium hypochlorite, cobalt + molybdenum, sucrose, sodium bicarbonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl. Incidence, severity, yield, and number of sclerotia produced were analyzed. The majority of the variables did not follow the normal distribution of the data according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; therefore, the use of non-parametric analysis was necessary. The analysis of all the treatments individually revealed no significant effects so it was decided to separate the analysis into the following groups of treatments: 'control', treatments using alternative products ('alternatives'), treatment only with fungicide ('fungicide') and treatments with alternative products and fungicide ('alternatives + fungicide'). In Arapoti, no significant differences for any variables were observed. In Mauá-da-Serra, the 'fungicide' and 'alternatives + fungicide' had the lowest incidence and number of sclerotia, with higher yield when compared to 'control' and 'alternatives'. No differences were observed for severity. In Pinhão, the 'fungicide' and 'alternatives + fungicide' were superior for incidence, number of sclerotia produced, and yield when compared to the 'control' and 'alternatives'. The 'alternatives + fungicide' showed significantly lower severity when compared to the control, 'alternatives' and 'fungicide' in Pinhão experiment. In conclusion, the alternative products applied in combination with fluazinam resulted in lower severity of white mold in soybean in the experiment conducted in Pinhão, and the application of fluazinam alone or in combination with alternative products, was efficient to control white mold in soybean in locations with high disease incidence. 
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/1423-1431
10.14393/BJ-v31n5a2015-28677
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/1423-1431
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v31n5a2015-28677
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/1423-1431/17132
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 31 No. 5 (2015): Sept./Oct.
Bioscience Journal ; v. 31 n. 5 (2015): Sept./Oct.
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069075410583552