Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/1423-1431 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate different alternative products, foliar sprayed either alone or in combination with fungicide fluazinam, to control white mold in soybean at three locations: Arapoti, Mauá-da-Serra, and Pinhão, in Paraná state, southern Brazil. The following chemical products were used: sodium dichloroisocyanurate, benzalkonium chloride, pyroligneous extract, sodium hypochlorite, cobalt + molybdenum, sucrose, sodium bicarbonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl. Incidence, severity, yield, and number of sclerotia produced were analyzed. The majority of the variables did not follow the normal distribution of the data according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; therefore, the use of non-parametric analysis was necessary. The analysis of all the treatments individually revealed no significant effects so it was decided to separate the analysis into the following groups of treatments: 'control', treatments using alternative products ('alternatives'), treatment only with fungicide ('fungicide') and treatments with alternative products and fungicide ('alternatives + fungicide'). In Arapoti, no significant differences for any variables were observed. In Mauá-da-Serra, the 'fungicide' and 'alternatives + fungicide' had the lowest incidence and number of sclerotia, with higher yield when compared to 'control' and 'alternatives'. No differences were observed for severity. In Pinhão, the 'fungicide' and 'alternatives + fungicide' were superior for incidence, number of sclerotia produced, and yield when compared to the 'control' and 'alternatives'. The 'alternatives + fungicide' showed significantly lower severity when compared to the control, 'alternatives' and 'fungicide' in Pinhão experiment. In conclusion, the alternative products applied in combination with fluazinam resulted in lower severity of white mold in soybean in the experiment conducted in Pinhão, and the application of fluazinam alone or in combination with alternative products, was efficient to control white mold in soybean in locations with high disease incidence. |
id |
UFU-14_95ee2fbc1004a4116184151a096917d7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/28677 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean Mofo BrancoGlycine max. Produtos domissanitários. Cloro. Indutor de resistência.Agricultural SciencesThe aim of this study was to evaluate different alternative products, foliar sprayed either alone or in combination with fungicide fluazinam, to control white mold in soybean at three locations: Arapoti, Mauá-da-Serra, and Pinhão, in Paraná state, southern Brazil. The following chemical products were used: sodium dichloroisocyanurate, benzalkonium chloride, pyroligneous extract, sodium hypochlorite, cobalt + molybdenum, sucrose, sodium bicarbonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl. Incidence, severity, yield, and number of sclerotia produced were analyzed. The majority of the variables did not follow the normal distribution of the data according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; therefore, the use of non-parametric analysis was necessary. The analysis of all the treatments individually revealed no significant effects so it was decided to separate the analysis into the following groups of treatments: 'control', treatments using alternative products ('alternatives'), treatment only with fungicide ('fungicide') and treatments with alternative products and fungicide ('alternatives + fungicide'). In Arapoti, no significant differences for any variables were observed. In Mauá-da-Serra, the 'fungicide' and 'alternatives + fungicide' had the lowest incidence and number of sclerotia, with higher yield when compared to 'control' and 'alternatives'. No differences were observed for severity. In Pinhão, the 'fungicide' and 'alternatives + fungicide' were superior for incidence, number of sclerotia produced, and yield when compared to the 'control' and 'alternatives'. The 'alternatives + fungicide' showed significantly lower severity when compared to the control, 'alternatives' and 'fungicide' in Pinhão experiment. In conclusion, the alternative products applied in combination with fluazinam resulted in lower severity of white mold in soybean in the experiment conducted in Pinhão, and the application of fluazinam alone or in combination with alternative products, was efficient to control white mold in soybean in locations with high disease incidence. EDUFU2015-09-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/1423-143110.14393/BJ-v31n5a2015-28677Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 31 No. 5 (2015): Sept./Oct.Bioscience Journal ; v. 31 n. 5 (2015): Sept./Oct.1981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/1423-1431/17132Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2015 Carlos Rafael Wutzki, David de Souza Jaccoud Filho, Cláudio Maurício Vrisman, Fernando Cezar Juliatti, Aguinaldo José do Nascimentohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWutzki, Carlos RafaelJaccoud Filho, David de SouzaVrisman, Cláudio MaurícioJuliatti, Fernando CezarNascimento, Aguinaldo José do2022-05-19T14:07:17Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/28677Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-19T14:07:17Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean |
title |
Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean |
spellingShingle |
Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean Wutzki, Carlos Rafael Mofo Branco Glycine max. Produtos domissanitários. Cloro. Indutor de resistência. Agricultural Sciences |
title_short |
Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean |
title_full |
Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean |
title_fullStr |
Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean |
title_full_unstemmed |
Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean |
title_sort |
Alternative products to control Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean |
author |
Wutzki, Carlos Rafael |
author_facet |
Wutzki, Carlos Rafael Jaccoud Filho, David de Souza Vrisman, Cláudio Maurício Juliatti, Fernando Cezar Nascimento, Aguinaldo José do |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jaccoud Filho, David de Souza Vrisman, Cláudio Maurício Juliatti, Fernando Cezar Nascimento, Aguinaldo José do |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Wutzki, Carlos Rafael Jaccoud Filho, David de Souza Vrisman, Cláudio Maurício Juliatti, Fernando Cezar Nascimento, Aguinaldo José do |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mofo Branco Glycine max. Produtos domissanitários. Cloro. Indutor de resistência. Agricultural Sciences |
topic |
Mofo Branco Glycine max. Produtos domissanitários. Cloro. Indutor de resistência. Agricultural Sciences |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate different alternative products, foliar sprayed either alone or in combination with fungicide fluazinam, to control white mold in soybean at three locations: Arapoti, Mauá-da-Serra, and Pinhão, in Paraná state, southern Brazil. The following chemical products were used: sodium dichloroisocyanurate, benzalkonium chloride, pyroligneous extract, sodium hypochlorite, cobalt + molybdenum, sucrose, sodium bicarbonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl. Incidence, severity, yield, and number of sclerotia produced were analyzed. The majority of the variables did not follow the normal distribution of the data according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; therefore, the use of non-parametric analysis was necessary. The analysis of all the treatments individually revealed no significant effects so it was decided to separate the analysis into the following groups of treatments: 'control', treatments using alternative products ('alternatives'), treatment only with fungicide ('fungicide') and treatments with alternative products and fungicide ('alternatives + fungicide'). In Arapoti, no significant differences for any variables were observed. In Mauá-da-Serra, the 'fungicide' and 'alternatives + fungicide' had the lowest incidence and number of sclerotia, with higher yield when compared to 'control' and 'alternatives'. No differences were observed for severity. In Pinhão, the 'fungicide' and 'alternatives + fungicide' were superior for incidence, number of sclerotia produced, and yield when compared to the 'control' and 'alternatives'. The 'alternatives + fungicide' showed significantly lower severity when compared to the control, 'alternatives' and 'fungicide' in Pinhão experiment. In conclusion, the alternative products applied in combination with fluazinam resulted in lower severity of white mold in soybean in the experiment conducted in Pinhão, and the application of fluazinam alone or in combination with alternative products, was efficient to control white mold in soybean in locations with high disease incidence. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-09-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/1423-1431 10.14393/BJ-v31n5a2015-28677 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/1423-1431 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v31n5a2015-28677 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/1423-1431/17132 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 31 No. 5 (2015): Sept./Oct. Bioscience Journal ; v. 31 n. 5 (2015): Sept./Oct. 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069075410583552 |