Tomato yield and quality under various combinations of organic compost
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/33057 |
Resumo: | The number of growers and planted area dedicated to organic farming have increased considerably. Consequently, demand has increased for alternative organic composts in terms of quantity and new options for direct use with crops. Making use of local industrial byproducts is also important throughout Brazil and the rest of the world. Therefore, it was evaluated the effect of eight types of organic composts, produced with different percentages of poultry litter and crushed sugarcane on tomato yield and quality. The experiment was carried out during the 2013 growing season at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Company of Minas Gerais state (Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Estado de Minas Gerais) located in Prudente de Morais, MG, Brazil. It was evaluated different formulations of poultry litter and crushed sugarcane (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 50, 60 and 70%) yielding eight types of alternative Bokashi used as organic compost in the production of two tomato cultivars (Santa Clara and the Verano hybrid). It was found that the various formulations of alternative Bokashi, except the alternative Bokashi B1, strengthened components of tomato yield and quality. We found that composts of poultry litter and crushed sugarcane increase tomato yield and quality and can be and excellent alternative, especially for organic farmers. |
id |
UFU-14_98c645fc0a0ae7a56312666e505cf262 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/33057 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tomato yield and quality under various combinations of organic compost Solanum lycopersicumSustainabilityMacronutrientsMicronutrients.Agricultural SciencesThe number of growers and planted area dedicated to organic farming have increased considerably. Consequently, demand has increased for alternative organic composts in terms of quantity and new options for direct use with crops. Making use of local industrial byproducts is also important throughout Brazil and the rest of the world. Therefore, it was evaluated the effect of eight types of organic composts, produced with different percentages of poultry litter and crushed sugarcane on tomato yield and quality. The experiment was carried out during the 2013 growing season at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Company of Minas Gerais state (Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Estado de Minas Gerais) located in Prudente de Morais, MG, Brazil. It was evaluated different formulations of poultry litter and crushed sugarcane (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 50, 60 and 70%) yielding eight types of alternative Bokashi used as organic compost in the production of two tomato cultivars (Santa Clara and the Verano hybrid). It was found that the various formulations of alternative Bokashi, except the alternative Bokashi B1, strengthened components of tomato yield and quality. We found that composts of poultry litter and crushed sugarcane increase tomato yield and quality and can be and excellent alternative, especially for organic farmers. EDUFU2016-10-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3305710.14393/BJ-v32n5a2016-33057Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 5 (2016): Sept./Oct.; 1147-1154Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 5 (2016): Sept./Oct.; 1147-11541981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/33057/19001Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2016 Fernando Cassimiro Tinoco França, Ernani Clarete da Silva, Marinalva Woods Pedrosa, Lanamar de Almeida Carlos, Gabriel Mascarenhas Macielhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFrança, Fernando Cassimiro Tinocoda Silva, Ernani ClaretePedrosa, Marinalva WoodsCarlos, Lanamar de AlmeidaMaciel, Gabriel Mascarenhas2022-02-21T14:11:30Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/33057Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-21T14:11:30Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tomato yield and quality under various combinations of organic compost |
title |
Tomato yield and quality under various combinations of organic compost |
spellingShingle |
Tomato yield and quality under various combinations of organic compost França, Fernando Cassimiro Tinoco Solanum lycopersicum Sustainability Macronutrients Micronutrients. Agricultural Sciences |
title_short |
Tomato yield and quality under various combinations of organic compost |
title_full |
Tomato yield and quality under various combinations of organic compost |
title_fullStr |
Tomato yield and quality under various combinations of organic compost |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tomato yield and quality under various combinations of organic compost |
title_sort |
Tomato yield and quality under various combinations of organic compost |
author |
França, Fernando Cassimiro Tinoco |
author_facet |
França, Fernando Cassimiro Tinoco da Silva, Ernani Clarete Pedrosa, Marinalva Woods Carlos, Lanamar de Almeida Maciel, Gabriel Mascarenhas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
da Silva, Ernani Clarete Pedrosa, Marinalva Woods Carlos, Lanamar de Almeida Maciel, Gabriel Mascarenhas |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
França, Fernando Cassimiro Tinoco da Silva, Ernani Clarete Pedrosa, Marinalva Woods Carlos, Lanamar de Almeida Maciel, Gabriel Mascarenhas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Solanum lycopersicum Sustainability Macronutrients Micronutrients. Agricultural Sciences |
topic |
Solanum lycopersicum Sustainability Macronutrients Micronutrients. Agricultural Sciences |
description |
The number of growers and planted area dedicated to organic farming have increased considerably. Consequently, demand has increased for alternative organic composts in terms of quantity and new options for direct use with crops. Making use of local industrial byproducts is also important throughout Brazil and the rest of the world. Therefore, it was evaluated the effect of eight types of organic composts, produced with different percentages of poultry litter and crushed sugarcane on tomato yield and quality. The experiment was carried out during the 2013 growing season at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Company of Minas Gerais state (Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Estado de Minas Gerais) located in Prudente de Morais, MG, Brazil. It was evaluated different formulations of poultry litter and crushed sugarcane (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 50, 60 and 70%) yielding eight types of alternative Bokashi used as organic compost in the production of two tomato cultivars (Santa Clara and the Verano hybrid). It was found that the various formulations of alternative Bokashi, except the alternative Bokashi B1, strengthened components of tomato yield and quality. We found that composts of poultry litter and crushed sugarcane increase tomato yield and quality and can be and excellent alternative, especially for organic farmers. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/33057 10.14393/BJ-v32n5a2016-33057 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/33057 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v32n5a2016-33057 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/33057/19001 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 5 (2016): Sept./Oct.; 1147-1154 Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 5 (2016): Sept./Oct.; 1147-1154 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069076449722368 |