Alternatives for chemical management of sourgrass
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32786 |
Resumo: | Intensive use of Glyphosate has been selected multiple resistant sourgrass biotypes in the areas of intensive agriculture in Brazil. Thus, it is important that viable management alternatives are evaluated for this invasion, which currently is regarded as the main problem of Brazilian agriculture. The study aimed to evaluate strategies for chemical management of sourgrass. Three trials divided according to the weed development stages were performed: Post-Initial (up to tillering), Post-Delayed (one to four tillers) and Adult-Plant (adult stage characterized by the beginning of the reproductive phase). The sourgrass seeds were collected from biotypes with evidence of Glyphosate tolerance in the municipality of Rio Brilhante - MS. In each trial were evaluated thirteen treatments and one witness, where the treatments were herbicide mixtures applications with subsequent sequential applications at different dates (7, 10 and 14 days after the first application) and the herbicides application without mixtures. Sourgrass plants are tolerant to Glyphosate and Clethodim herbicides. Formulated mixtures of Paraquat + Diuron and Haloxifop are the most suitable for controlling sourgrass plants derived from seeds, regardless of the control period. Treatments that have the Haloxyfop herbicide in the first application provided better control when compared to the other treatments with mixtures and sequential applications at all stages of applications. |
id |
UFU-14_c22ea849e7437fffc11a25bf9ee90003 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/32786 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Alternatives for chemical management of sourgrass Digitaria insularis. Herbicides. Action mechanisms.Agricultural SciencesIntensive use of Glyphosate has been selected multiple resistant sourgrass biotypes in the areas of intensive agriculture in Brazil. Thus, it is important that viable management alternatives are evaluated for this invasion, which currently is regarded as the main problem of Brazilian agriculture. The study aimed to evaluate strategies for chemical management of sourgrass. Three trials divided according to the weed development stages were performed: Post-Initial (up to tillering), Post-Delayed (one to four tillers) and Adult-Plant (adult stage characterized by the beginning of the reproductive phase). The sourgrass seeds were collected from biotypes with evidence of Glyphosate tolerance in the municipality of Rio Brilhante - MS. In each trial were evaluated thirteen treatments and one witness, where the treatments were herbicide mixtures applications with subsequent sequential applications at different dates (7, 10 and 14 days after the first application) and the herbicides application without mixtures. Sourgrass plants are tolerant to Glyphosate and Clethodim herbicides. Formulated mixtures of Paraquat + Diuron and Haloxifop are the most suitable for controlling sourgrass plants derived from seeds, regardless of the control period. Treatments that have the Haloxyfop herbicide in the first application provided better control when compared to the other treatments with mixtures and sequential applications at all stages of applications.EDUFU2016-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3278610.14393/BJ-v32n4a2016-32786Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2016): July/Aug.; 881-889Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 4 (2016): July/Aug.; 881-8891981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32786/18523Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2016 Eraldo Godinho Gilo, Cristiane Gonçalves de Mendonça, Tiago Lima do Espírito Santo, Paulo Eduardo Teodorohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGilo, Eraldo GodinhoMendonça, Cristiane Gonçalves deSanto, Tiago Lima do EspíritoTeodoro, Paulo Eduardo2022-02-22T01:51:34Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/32786Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-22T01:51:34Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Alternatives for chemical management of sourgrass |
title |
Alternatives for chemical management of sourgrass |
spellingShingle |
Alternatives for chemical management of sourgrass Gilo, Eraldo Godinho Digitaria insularis. Herbicides. Action mechanisms. Agricultural Sciences |
title_short |
Alternatives for chemical management of sourgrass |
title_full |
Alternatives for chemical management of sourgrass |
title_fullStr |
Alternatives for chemical management of sourgrass |
title_full_unstemmed |
Alternatives for chemical management of sourgrass |
title_sort |
Alternatives for chemical management of sourgrass |
author |
Gilo, Eraldo Godinho |
author_facet |
Gilo, Eraldo Godinho Mendonça, Cristiane Gonçalves de Santo, Tiago Lima do Espírito Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mendonça, Cristiane Gonçalves de Santo, Tiago Lima do Espírito Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gilo, Eraldo Godinho Mendonça, Cristiane Gonçalves de Santo, Tiago Lima do Espírito Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Digitaria insularis. Herbicides. Action mechanisms. Agricultural Sciences |
topic |
Digitaria insularis. Herbicides. Action mechanisms. Agricultural Sciences |
description |
Intensive use of Glyphosate has been selected multiple resistant sourgrass biotypes in the areas of intensive agriculture in Brazil. Thus, it is important that viable management alternatives are evaluated for this invasion, which currently is regarded as the main problem of Brazilian agriculture. The study aimed to evaluate strategies for chemical management of sourgrass. Three trials divided according to the weed development stages were performed: Post-Initial (up to tillering), Post-Delayed (one to four tillers) and Adult-Plant (adult stage characterized by the beginning of the reproductive phase). The sourgrass seeds were collected from biotypes with evidence of Glyphosate tolerance in the municipality of Rio Brilhante - MS. In each trial were evaluated thirteen treatments and one witness, where the treatments were herbicide mixtures applications with subsequent sequential applications at different dates (7, 10 and 14 days after the first application) and the herbicides application without mixtures. Sourgrass plants are tolerant to Glyphosate and Clethodim herbicides. Formulated mixtures of Paraquat + Diuron and Haloxifop are the most suitable for controlling sourgrass plants derived from seeds, regardless of the control period. Treatments that have the Haloxyfop herbicide in the first application provided better control when compared to the other treatments with mixtures and sequential applications at all stages of applications. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32786 10.14393/BJ-v32n4a2016-32786 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32786 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v32n4a2016-32786 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32786/18523 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2016): July/Aug.; 881-889 Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 4 (2016): July/Aug.; 881-889 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069076343816192 |