Black spaces between maxillary incisors: what is the aesthetic limit?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pithon, Matheus Melo
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Lacerda-Santos, Rogério, Barreto, Jéssica Rocha, Rocha, Jéssica Oliveira, Brasil, Raissa Virgínea Galvão, Weberling, Larissa Batista, Paixão, Jorge Victor Barbosa, Coqueiro, Raildo da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/29092
Resumo: The focus of this article was evaluates the degree of perception of laypersons of different age groups with respect to smile esthetics in cases involving black spaces between maxillary incisors. Changes were made in a photograph of a smiling female patient, simulating various configurations of black spaces between maxillary incisors. For this purpose an image manipulation Photoshop CS3 was used. For evaluation black spaces of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm in size were created. After digital manipulation, the photographs were printed on photographic paper, attached to a questionnaire, and distributed among laypersons in the age groups of 15-19; 35-44, and 65-74. To evaluate the degree of esthetics, a scale of attractiveness was used, in which a score of 0 would represent ''not very attractive'', 5 ''attractive'' and 10 ''very attractive''. Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test was used (P<0.05). Results showed that the photographs without black space and with black space of 2.5 mm were scored as the most and least attractive, respectively, by all the age groups. The degree of perception of black spaces between maxillary incisors gradually diminished as the age of the groups increased (P<0.05). Black spaces have a negative repercussion on smile esthetics, perceived more easily by younger persons. The larger the black space, less attractive the smile.
id UFU-14_c4a0460c9073873203b17634fde1e04e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/29092
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Black spaces between maxillary incisors: what is the aesthetic limit? Dental EstheticsOrthodonticsPerceptionHealth SciencesThe focus of this article was evaluates the degree of perception of laypersons of different age groups with respect to smile esthetics in cases involving black spaces between maxillary incisors. Changes were made in a photograph of a smiling female patient, simulating various configurations of black spaces between maxillary incisors. For this purpose an image manipulation Photoshop CS3 was used. For evaluation black spaces of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm in size were created. After digital manipulation, the photographs were printed on photographic paper, attached to a questionnaire, and distributed among laypersons in the age groups of 15-19; 35-44, and 65-74. To evaluate the degree of esthetics, a scale of attractiveness was used, in which a score of 0 would represent ''not very attractive'', 5 ''attractive'' and 10 ''very attractive''. Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test was used (P<0.05). Results showed that the photographs without black space and with black space of 2.5 mm were scored as the most and least attractive, respectively, by all the age groups. The degree of perception of black spaces between maxillary incisors gradually diminished as the age of the groups increased (P<0.05). Black spaces have a negative repercussion on smile esthetics, perceived more easily by younger persons. The larger the black space, less attractive the smile.EDUFU2015-09-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/2909210.14393/BJ-v31n5a2015-29092Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 31 No. 5 (2015): Sept./Oct.; 1586-1593Bioscience Journal ; v. 31 n. 5 (2015): Sept./Oct.; 1586-15931981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/29092/17152Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2015 Matheus Melo Pithon, Rogério Lacerda-Santos, Jéssica Rocha Barreto, Jéssica Oliveira Rocha, Raissa Virgínea Galvão Brasil, Larissa Batista Weberling, Jorge Victor Barbosa Paixão, Raildo da Silva Coqueirohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPithon, Matheus MeloLacerda-Santos, RogérioBarreto, Jéssica RochaRocha, Jéssica OliveiraBrasil, Raissa Virgínea GalvãoWeberling, Larissa BatistaPaixão, Jorge Victor BarbosaCoqueiro, Raildo da Silva2022-05-19T15:18:17Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/29092Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-19T15:18:17Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Black spaces between maxillary incisors: what is the aesthetic limit?
title Black spaces between maxillary incisors: what is the aesthetic limit?
spellingShingle Black spaces between maxillary incisors: what is the aesthetic limit?
Pithon, Matheus Melo
Dental Esthetics
Orthodontics
Perception
Health Sciences
title_short Black spaces between maxillary incisors: what is the aesthetic limit?
title_full Black spaces between maxillary incisors: what is the aesthetic limit?
title_fullStr Black spaces between maxillary incisors: what is the aesthetic limit?
title_full_unstemmed Black spaces between maxillary incisors: what is the aesthetic limit?
title_sort Black spaces between maxillary incisors: what is the aesthetic limit?
author Pithon, Matheus Melo
author_facet Pithon, Matheus Melo
Lacerda-Santos, Rogério
Barreto, Jéssica Rocha
Rocha, Jéssica Oliveira
Brasil, Raissa Virgínea Galvão
Weberling, Larissa Batista
Paixão, Jorge Victor Barbosa
Coqueiro, Raildo da Silva
author_role author
author2 Lacerda-Santos, Rogério
Barreto, Jéssica Rocha
Rocha, Jéssica Oliveira
Brasil, Raissa Virgínea Galvão
Weberling, Larissa Batista
Paixão, Jorge Victor Barbosa
Coqueiro, Raildo da Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pithon, Matheus Melo
Lacerda-Santos, Rogério
Barreto, Jéssica Rocha
Rocha, Jéssica Oliveira
Brasil, Raissa Virgínea Galvão
Weberling, Larissa Batista
Paixão, Jorge Victor Barbosa
Coqueiro, Raildo da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental Esthetics
Orthodontics
Perception
Health Sciences
topic Dental Esthetics
Orthodontics
Perception
Health Sciences
description The focus of this article was evaluates the degree of perception of laypersons of different age groups with respect to smile esthetics in cases involving black spaces between maxillary incisors. Changes were made in a photograph of a smiling female patient, simulating various configurations of black spaces between maxillary incisors. For this purpose an image manipulation Photoshop CS3 was used. For evaluation black spaces of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm in size were created. After digital manipulation, the photographs were printed on photographic paper, attached to a questionnaire, and distributed among laypersons in the age groups of 15-19; 35-44, and 65-74. To evaluate the degree of esthetics, a scale of attractiveness was used, in which a score of 0 would represent ''not very attractive'', 5 ''attractive'' and 10 ''very attractive''. Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test was used (P<0.05). Results showed that the photographs without black space and with black space of 2.5 mm were scored as the most and least attractive, respectively, by all the age groups. The degree of perception of black spaces between maxillary incisors gradually diminished as the age of the groups increased (P<0.05). Black spaces have a negative repercussion on smile esthetics, perceived more easily by younger persons. The larger the black space, less attractive the smile.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/29092
10.14393/BJ-v31n5a2015-29092
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/29092
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v31n5a2015-29092
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/29092/17152
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 31 No. 5 (2015): Sept./Oct.; 1586-1593
Bioscience Journal ; v. 31 n. 5 (2015): Sept./Oct.; 1586-1593
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069075417923584