Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Palti, Elías J.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: ArtCultura (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/article/view/71194
Resumo: Conceptual anachronisms has been always considered one of the worst sins by an intellectual historian. The will to discover how the meaning of the fundamental concepts of political and social discourse was modified would demand to contextualize them. Particularly relevant in this sense is Quentin Skinner and the so-called Cambridge School´s "discursive contextualist" proposal. However, it has recently come under severe criticism. Not only has the possibility of historically of recreating the various discursive contexts and getting rid of the “presentism” of our current perspectives and presuppositions been disputed. What is at stake is whether such a historicist vocation is really relevant for the correct understanding of the texts of the past. It would lead to ignore that transcendent dimension of discourses that allows them to become transposed from their original contexts of production and project forward into time. In the face of this criticisms, the present essay reaffirms the need to historically contextualize discourses as well as the perverse consequences, in methodological terms, implicit in the positions that deny it.
id UFU-15_66823556dbef05554f6ba61cdeeb4a92
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/71194
network_acronym_str UFU-15
network_name_str ArtCultura (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historianAnacronismo conceptual: el pecado del historiador intelectualHistoria intelectualanacronismo conceptualcrítica del contextualismoIntellectual Historyconceptual anachronismcriticism of contextualismConceptual anachronisms has been always considered one of the worst sins by an intellectual historian. The will to discover how the meaning of the fundamental concepts of political and social discourse was modified would demand to contextualize them. Particularly relevant in this sense is Quentin Skinner and the so-called Cambridge School´s "discursive contextualist" proposal. However, it has recently come under severe criticism. Not only has the possibility of historically of recreating the various discursive contexts and getting rid of the “presentism” of our current perspectives and presuppositions been disputed. What is at stake is whether such a historicist vocation is really relevant for the correct understanding of the texts of the past. It would lead to ignore that transcendent dimension of discourses that allows them to become transposed from their original contexts of production and project forward into time. In the face of this criticisms, the present essay reaffirms the need to historically contextualize discourses as well as the perverse consequences, in methodological terms, implicit in the positions that deny it.Los anacronismos conceptuales fueron siempre considerados como uno de los peores pecados en el que podría incurrir un historiador intelectual. El afán de descubrir cómo se fue modificando el sentido de los conceptos fundamentales del discurso político y social y comprender así qué los especifica históricamente requeriría contextualizar los mismos. Particularmente relevante al respecto es la propuesta “contextualista discursiva” de Quentin Skinner y la llamada Escuela de Cambridge. Sin embargo, recientemente ha sido objeto de severas críticas. No sólo se ha puesto en debate la posibilidad de reconstruir históricamente los diversos contextos discursivos y lograr desprenderse del “presentismo” de nuestras propias perspectivas y presupuestos. Lo que se pone en duda es si tal vocación historicista resulta realmente pertinente para la correcta comprensión de los textos del pasado. La misma llevaría a desconocer esa dimensión trascendente de los discursos que les permite trasponerse a sus contextos originarios de producción y proyectarse en el tiempo. Frente a estas críticas en el presente ensayo se reafirma la necesidad de contextualizar históricamente los discursos, así como las consecuencias perversas, en términos metodológicos, implícitas en las posturas que lo niegan.Universidade Federal de Uberlândia2023-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/article/view/7119410.14393/artc-v25-n46-2023-71194ArtCultura; Vol. 25 No. 46 (2023): ArtCultura; 180-195ArtCultura; Vol. 25 Núm. 46 (2023): ArtCultura; 180-195ArtCultura; v. 25 n. 46 (2023): ArtCultura; 180-1952178-3845reponame:ArtCultura (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/article/view/71194/37081Palti, Elías J.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-01T18:58:25Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/71194Revistahttp://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/oaiakparanhos@uol.com.br||2178-38452178-3845opendoar:2023-12-01T18:58:25ArtCultura (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian
Anacronismo conceptual: el pecado del historiador intelectual
title Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian
spellingShingle Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian
Palti, Elías J.
Historia intelectual
anacronismo conceptual
crítica del contextualismo
Intellectual History
conceptual anachronism
criticism of contextualism
title_short Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian
title_full Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian
title_fullStr Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian
title_full_unstemmed Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian
title_sort Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian
author Palti, Elías J.
author_facet Palti, Elías J.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Palti, Elías J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Historia intelectual
anacronismo conceptual
crítica del contextualismo
Intellectual History
conceptual anachronism
criticism of contextualism
topic Historia intelectual
anacronismo conceptual
crítica del contextualismo
Intellectual History
conceptual anachronism
criticism of contextualism
description Conceptual anachronisms has been always considered one of the worst sins by an intellectual historian. The will to discover how the meaning of the fundamental concepts of political and social discourse was modified would demand to contextualize them. Particularly relevant in this sense is Quentin Skinner and the so-called Cambridge School´s "discursive contextualist" proposal. However, it has recently come under severe criticism. Not only has the possibility of historically of recreating the various discursive contexts and getting rid of the “presentism” of our current perspectives and presuppositions been disputed. What is at stake is whether such a historicist vocation is really relevant for the correct understanding of the texts of the past. It would lead to ignore that transcendent dimension of discourses that allows them to become transposed from their original contexts of production and project forward into time. In the face of this criticisms, the present essay reaffirms the need to historically contextualize discourses as well as the perverse consequences, in methodological terms, implicit in the positions that deny it.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/article/view/71194
10.14393/artc-v25-n46-2023-71194
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/article/view/71194
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/artc-v25-n46-2023-71194
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/article/view/71194/37081
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ArtCultura; Vol. 25 No. 46 (2023): ArtCultura; 180-195
ArtCultura; Vol. 25 Núm. 46 (2023): ArtCultura; 180-195
ArtCultura; v. 25 n. 46 (2023): ArtCultura; 180-195
2178-3845
reponame:ArtCultura (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str ArtCultura (Online)
collection ArtCultura (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv ArtCultura (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv akparanhos@uol.com.br||
_version_ 1797069138956386304