Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | ArtCultura (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/article/view/71194 |
Resumo: | Conceptual anachronisms has been always considered one of the worst sins by an intellectual historian. The will to discover how the meaning of the fundamental concepts of political and social discourse was modified would demand to contextualize them. Particularly relevant in this sense is Quentin Skinner and the so-called Cambridge School´s "discursive contextualist" proposal. However, it has recently come under severe criticism. Not only has the possibility of historically of recreating the various discursive contexts and getting rid of the “presentism” of our current perspectives and presuppositions been disputed. What is at stake is whether such a historicist vocation is really relevant for the correct understanding of the texts of the past. It would lead to ignore that transcendent dimension of discourses that allows them to become transposed from their original contexts of production and project forward into time. In the face of this criticisms, the present essay reaffirms the need to historically contextualize discourses as well as the perverse consequences, in methodological terms, implicit in the positions that deny it. |
id |
UFU-15_66823556dbef05554f6ba61cdeeb4a92 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/71194 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-15 |
network_name_str |
ArtCultura (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historianAnacronismo conceptual: el pecado del historiador intelectualHistoria intelectualanacronismo conceptualcrítica del contextualismoIntellectual Historyconceptual anachronismcriticism of contextualismConceptual anachronisms has been always considered one of the worst sins by an intellectual historian. The will to discover how the meaning of the fundamental concepts of political and social discourse was modified would demand to contextualize them. Particularly relevant in this sense is Quentin Skinner and the so-called Cambridge School´s "discursive contextualist" proposal. However, it has recently come under severe criticism. Not only has the possibility of historically of recreating the various discursive contexts and getting rid of the “presentism” of our current perspectives and presuppositions been disputed. What is at stake is whether such a historicist vocation is really relevant for the correct understanding of the texts of the past. It would lead to ignore that transcendent dimension of discourses that allows them to become transposed from their original contexts of production and project forward into time. In the face of this criticisms, the present essay reaffirms the need to historically contextualize discourses as well as the perverse consequences, in methodological terms, implicit in the positions that deny it.Los anacronismos conceptuales fueron siempre considerados como uno de los peores pecados en el que podría incurrir un historiador intelectual. El afán de descubrir cómo se fue modificando el sentido de los conceptos fundamentales del discurso político y social y comprender así qué los especifica históricamente requeriría contextualizar los mismos. Particularmente relevante al respecto es la propuesta “contextualista discursiva” de Quentin Skinner y la llamada Escuela de Cambridge. Sin embargo, recientemente ha sido objeto de severas críticas. No sólo se ha puesto en debate la posibilidad de reconstruir históricamente los diversos contextos discursivos y lograr desprenderse del “presentismo” de nuestras propias perspectivas y presupuestos. Lo que se pone en duda es si tal vocación historicista resulta realmente pertinente para la correcta comprensión de los textos del pasado. La misma llevaría a desconocer esa dimensión trascendente de los discursos que les permite trasponerse a sus contextos originarios de producción y proyectarse en el tiempo. Frente a estas críticas en el presente ensayo se reafirma la necesidad de contextualizar históricamente los discursos, así como las consecuencias perversas, en términos metodológicos, implícitas en las posturas que lo niegan.Universidade Federal de Uberlândia2023-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/article/view/7119410.14393/artc-v25-n46-2023-71194ArtCultura; Vol. 25 No. 46 (2023): ArtCultura; 180-195ArtCultura; Vol. 25 Núm. 46 (2023): ArtCultura; 180-195ArtCultura; v. 25 n. 46 (2023): ArtCultura; 180-1952178-3845reponame:ArtCultura (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/article/view/71194/37081Palti, Elías J.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-01T18:58:25Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/71194Revistahttp://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/oaiakparanhos@uol.com.br||2178-38452178-3845opendoar:2023-12-01T18:58:25ArtCultura (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian Anacronismo conceptual: el pecado del historiador intelectual |
title |
Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian |
spellingShingle |
Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian Palti, Elías J. Historia intelectual anacronismo conceptual crítica del contextualismo Intellectual History conceptual anachronism criticism of contextualism |
title_short |
Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian |
title_full |
Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian |
title_fullStr |
Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian |
title_sort |
Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian |
author |
Palti, Elías J. |
author_facet |
Palti, Elías J. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Palti, Elías J. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Historia intelectual anacronismo conceptual crítica del contextualismo Intellectual History conceptual anachronism criticism of contextualism |
topic |
Historia intelectual anacronismo conceptual crítica del contextualismo Intellectual History conceptual anachronism criticism of contextualism |
description |
Conceptual anachronisms has been always considered one of the worst sins by an intellectual historian. The will to discover how the meaning of the fundamental concepts of political and social discourse was modified would demand to contextualize them. Particularly relevant in this sense is Quentin Skinner and the so-called Cambridge School´s "discursive contextualist" proposal. However, it has recently come under severe criticism. Not only has the possibility of historically of recreating the various discursive contexts and getting rid of the “presentism” of our current perspectives and presuppositions been disputed. What is at stake is whether such a historicist vocation is really relevant for the correct understanding of the texts of the past. It would lead to ignore that transcendent dimension of discourses that allows them to become transposed from their original contexts of production and project forward into time. In the face of this criticisms, the present essay reaffirms the need to historically contextualize discourses as well as the perverse consequences, in methodological terms, implicit in the positions that deny it. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/article/view/71194 10.14393/artc-v25-n46-2023-71194 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/article/view/71194 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/artc-v25-n46-2023-71194 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/artcultura/article/view/71194/37081 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ArtCultura; Vol. 25 No. 46 (2023): ArtCultura; 180-195 ArtCultura; Vol. 25 Núm. 46 (2023): ArtCultura; 180-195 ArtCultura; v. 25 n. 46 (2023): ArtCultura; 180-195 2178-3845 reponame:ArtCultura (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
ArtCultura (Online) |
collection |
ArtCultura (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
ArtCultura (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
akparanhos@uol.com.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069138956386304 |