EVALUATION OF THE CREATION OF PRIVATE NATURAL HERITAGE RESERVES (RPPN) IN THE STATE OF PARANÁ
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Caminhos de Geografia |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/caminhosdegeografia/article/view/60360 |
Resumo: | Private Reserves of Natural Heritage (RPPN) are considered an effective and low-cost way for the government to create protected areas, depending mainly on the will of their owners. This article aims to present an evaluation of the creation of RPPN in Paraná, demonstrating the main deficiencies and potentialities of these areas. A qualitative-quantitative questionnaire was applied to 132 RPPN owners, from 2014 to 2016. The main result is the deficiency in the process of creating these areas by the environmental agency, at the beginning of the creation process, and the participation of the municipalities, promoting the creation based on the economic interest in the Tax on the Circulation of Ecological Goods and Services (ICMS). This scenario generated owners who did not receive any support in the management of these areas (71.2%) and who feel dissatisfied (37.9%) and, potentially, it can be seen that the vast majority (91.7%) of the areas visited in the application of the questionnaire contribute to the formation of ecological corridors, which justifies their creation and allows, from this perspective, to fulfill their main objective, the conservation of biodiversity. Coordination processes between owners and public authorities are necessary to improve this scenario. |
id |
UFU-16_fc37289e689e23e8e4293add1b0f74d8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/60360 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-16 |
network_name_str |
Caminhos de Geografia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
EVALUATION OF THE CREATION OF PRIVATE NATURAL HERITAGE RESERVES (RPPN) IN THE STATE OF PARANÁAVALIAÇÃO DA CRIAÇÃO DE RESERVAS PARTICULARES DO PATRIMÔNIO NATURAL (RPPN) NO ESTADO DO PARANÁUnidade de ConservaçãoÁrea protegida privadaCriação de RPPNConservation UnitPrivate protected areaCreation of RPPNPrivate Reserves of Natural Heritage (RPPN) are considered an effective and low-cost way for the government to create protected areas, depending mainly on the will of their owners. This article aims to present an evaluation of the creation of RPPN in Paraná, demonstrating the main deficiencies and potentialities of these areas. A qualitative-quantitative questionnaire was applied to 132 RPPN owners, from 2014 to 2016. The main result is the deficiency in the process of creating these areas by the environmental agency, at the beginning of the creation process, and the participation of the municipalities, promoting the creation based on the economic interest in the Tax on the Circulation of Ecological Goods and Services (ICMS). This scenario generated owners who did not receive any support in the management of these areas (71.2%) and who feel dissatisfied (37.9%) and, potentially, it can be seen that the vast majority (91.7%) of the areas visited in the application of the questionnaire contribute to the formation of ecological corridors, which justifies their creation and allows, from this perspective, to fulfill their main objective, the conservation of biodiversity. Coordination processes between owners and public authorities are necessary to improve this scenario.As Reservas Particulares do Patrimônio Natural (RPPN) são consideradas uma forma efetiva e de baixo custo ao poder público para a criação de áreas protegidas, dependendo principalmente da vontade voluntária de seus proprietários. O presente artigo tem como objetivo apresentar uma avaliação da criação das RPPN no Paraná, demonstrando as principais deficiências e potencialidades dessas áreas. Aplicou-se um questionário quali-quantitativo a 132 proprietários de RPPN, entre os anos de 2014 e 2016. Como principal resultado destaca-se a deficiência no processo de criação dessas áreas por parte do órgão ambiental, no início do processo de criação, e a participação das prefeituras incentivando a criação com base no interesse financeiro do Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços (ICMS) Ecológico. Esse panorama gerou proprietários que não receberam qualquer apoio na gestão destas áreas (71,2%) e que se consideram insatisfeitos (37,9%) e, potencialmente, percebe-se que a grande maioria (91,7%) das áreas visitadas na aplicação do questionário contribui para a formação de corredores ecológicos, o que justifica sua criação e faz com que, por esta ótica, se atenda a seu principal objetivo, a conservação da biodiversidade. Processos de articulação entre proprietários e poder público são necessários para a melhoria desse cenário.EDUFU - Editora da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia2022-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/caminhosdegeografia/article/view/6036010.14393/RCG238960360Caminhos de Geografia; Vol. 23 No. 89 (2022): Outubro; 202-220Caminhos de Geografia; Vol. 23 Núm. 89 (2022): Outubro; 202-220Caminhos de Geografia; v. 23 n. 89 (2022): Outubro; 202-2201678-6343reponame:Caminhos de Geografiainstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/caminhosdegeografia/article/view/60360/34765Copyright (c) 2022 Gustavo Luis Schacht, Yuri Tavares Rochahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchacht, Gustavo LuisRocha, Yuri Tavares2022-10-11T13:56:10Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/60360Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/caminhosdegeografia/indexPUBhttp://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/caminhosdegeografia/oaiflaviasantosgeo@gmail.com1678-63431678-6343opendoar:2022-10-11T13:56:10Caminhos de Geografia - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
EVALUATION OF THE CREATION OF PRIVATE NATURAL HERITAGE RESERVES (RPPN) IN THE STATE OF PARANÁ AVALIAÇÃO DA CRIAÇÃO DE RESERVAS PARTICULARES DO PATRIMÔNIO NATURAL (RPPN) NO ESTADO DO PARANÁ |
title |
EVALUATION OF THE CREATION OF PRIVATE NATURAL HERITAGE RESERVES (RPPN) IN THE STATE OF PARANÁ |
spellingShingle |
EVALUATION OF THE CREATION OF PRIVATE NATURAL HERITAGE RESERVES (RPPN) IN THE STATE OF PARANÁ Schacht, Gustavo Luis Unidade de Conservação Área protegida privada Criação de RPPN Conservation Unit Private protected area Creation of RPPN |
title_short |
EVALUATION OF THE CREATION OF PRIVATE NATURAL HERITAGE RESERVES (RPPN) IN THE STATE OF PARANÁ |
title_full |
EVALUATION OF THE CREATION OF PRIVATE NATURAL HERITAGE RESERVES (RPPN) IN THE STATE OF PARANÁ |
title_fullStr |
EVALUATION OF THE CREATION OF PRIVATE NATURAL HERITAGE RESERVES (RPPN) IN THE STATE OF PARANÁ |
title_full_unstemmed |
EVALUATION OF THE CREATION OF PRIVATE NATURAL HERITAGE RESERVES (RPPN) IN THE STATE OF PARANÁ |
title_sort |
EVALUATION OF THE CREATION OF PRIVATE NATURAL HERITAGE RESERVES (RPPN) IN THE STATE OF PARANÁ |
author |
Schacht, Gustavo Luis |
author_facet |
Schacht, Gustavo Luis Rocha, Yuri Tavares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha, Yuri Tavares |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schacht, Gustavo Luis Rocha, Yuri Tavares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Unidade de Conservação Área protegida privada Criação de RPPN Conservation Unit Private protected area Creation of RPPN |
topic |
Unidade de Conservação Área protegida privada Criação de RPPN Conservation Unit Private protected area Creation of RPPN |
description |
Private Reserves of Natural Heritage (RPPN) are considered an effective and low-cost way for the government to create protected areas, depending mainly on the will of their owners. This article aims to present an evaluation of the creation of RPPN in Paraná, demonstrating the main deficiencies and potentialities of these areas. A qualitative-quantitative questionnaire was applied to 132 RPPN owners, from 2014 to 2016. The main result is the deficiency in the process of creating these areas by the environmental agency, at the beginning of the creation process, and the participation of the municipalities, promoting the creation based on the economic interest in the Tax on the Circulation of Ecological Goods and Services (ICMS). This scenario generated owners who did not receive any support in the management of these areas (71.2%) and who feel dissatisfied (37.9%) and, potentially, it can be seen that the vast majority (91.7%) of the areas visited in the application of the questionnaire contribute to the formation of ecological corridors, which justifies their creation and allows, from this perspective, to fulfill their main objective, the conservation of biodiversity. Coordination processes between owners and public authorities are necessary to improve this scenario. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/caminhosdegeografia/article/view/60360 10.14393/RCG238960360 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/caminhosdegeografia/article/view/60360 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/RCG238960360 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/caminhosdegeografia/article/view/60360/34765 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Gustavo Luis Schacht, Yuri Tavares Rocha http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Gustavo Luis Schacht, Yuri Tavares Rocha http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU - Editora da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU - Editora da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Caminhos de Geografia; Vol. 23 No. 89 (2022): Outubro; 202-220 Caminhos de Geografia; Vol. 23 Núm. 89 (2022): Outubro; 202-220 Caminhos de Geografia; v. 23 n. 89 (2022): Outubro; 202-220 1678-6343 reponame:Caminhos de Geografia instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Caminhos de Geografia |
collection |
Caminhos de Geografia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Caminhos de Geografia - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
flaviasantosgeo@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797067018819600384 |