(Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Buhler, Eve Anne
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Gautreau, Pierre, Oliveira, Valter Lúcio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Sociedade & natureza (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769
Resumo: The increasing incorporation of biophysical processes into the market since the late 1980s, especially those related to agricultural frontiers, has been interpreted by some authors in terms of "neoliberalization of nature". Such a perspective has been quite fertile in critical studies of contemporary environmental issues, but it has been questionning by suffering serious objections. Some of these objections question the theoretical foundations of the neoliberalization of nature thesis and point to a certain conceptual lack in view of the diversity of definitions of the main concepts. Another type of objection refers to its low potential for empirical analysis, since it is so broad that it does not help to understand an inevitably incomplete and partial set of processes. The present contribution proposes a balance of the theoretical and empirical debates about the neoliberalization of nature, passing by its main authors and taking as reference some empirical researches that we have carried out about agribusiness in Brazil. We will discuss about how far its limits are due to inconsistencies pointed out by its critics or, instead (and beyond), to the lack of precautions in mobilizing an approach that deserves attention and interest nonetheless.
id UFU-6_3bca4aaa844cbc81aca7f664d7cd4f9f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/51769
network_acronym_str UFU-6
network_name_str Sociedade & natureza (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling (Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature (Im)Pertinências de uma abordagem teórica: a neoliberalização da naturezaMercantilizaçãogovernança ambientalcapitalismoComodificationEnvironmental governanceCapitalismThe increasing incorporation of biophysical processes into the market since the late 1980s, especially those related to agricultural frontiers, has been interpreted by some authors in terms of "neoliberalization of nature". Such a perspective has been quite fertile in critical studies of contemporary environmental issues, but it has been questionning by suffering serious objections. Some of these objections question the theoretical foundations of the neoliberalization of nature thesis and point to a certain conceptual lack in view of the diversity of definitions of the main concepts. Another type of objection refers to its low potential for empirical analysis, since it is so broad that it does not help to understand an inevitably incomplete and partial set of processes. The present contribution proposes a balance of the theoretical and empirical debates about the neoliberalization of nature, passing by its main authors and taking as reference some empirical researches that we have carried out about agribusiness in Brazil. We will discuss about how far its limits are due to inconsistencies pointed out by its critics or, instead (and beyond), to the lack of precautions in mobilizing an approach that deserves attention and interest nonetheless.A crescente incorporação dos processos biofísicos pelo mercado verificado a partir do final dos anos 1980, em especial aqueles relacionados aos avanços das fronteiras agrícolas, foi interpretado por alguns autores em termos de "neoliberalização da natureza". Tal perspectiva foi bastante fértil nos estudos críticos das questões ambientais contemporâneas, mas foi colocada à prova ao sofrer sérias objeções desferidas a partir de diversos ângulos. Algumas dessas objeções questionam os fundamentos teóricos da tese da neoliberalização da natureza e apontam para um certo afrouxamento conceitual frente a diversidade das definições dos conceitos adotados. Outro tipo de objeção se volta para o seu limitado potencial de análise empírica, na medida em que, de tão amplo, não auxilia na compreensão de um conjunto de processos inevitavelmente incompletos e parciais. A presente contribuição propõe um balanço dos debates teóricos e empíricos sobre a neoliberalização da natureza passando por seus principais autores e tomando por referência pesquisas empíricas que temos realizado sobre o agronegócio no Brasil. Discutiremos em que medida os seus limites se devem às inconsistências apontadas pelos seus críticos ou, ao invés (e além) disso, à falta de precauções na mobilização de uma abordagem que merece, apesar de tudo, atenção e interesse.Universidade Federal de Uberlândia2020-08-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/5176910.14393/SN-v32-2020-51769Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 32 (2020); 551-564Sociedade & Natureza; v. 32 (2020); 551-5641982-45130103-1570reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769/29620https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769/29621Copyright (c) 2020 Eve-Anne Buhlerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBuhler, Eve AnneGautreau, Pierre Oliveira, Valter Lúcio2021-07-01T16:18:20Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/51769Revistahttp://www.sociedadenatureza.ig.ufu.br/PUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/oai||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br1982-45130103-1570opendoar:2021-07-01T16:18:20Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv (Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature
(Im)Pertinências de uma abordagem teórica: a neoliberalização da natureza
title (Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature
spellingShingle (Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature
Buhler, Eve Anne
Mercantilização
governança ambiental
capitalismo
Comodification
Environmental governance
Capitalism
title_short (Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature
title_full (Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature
title_fullStr (Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature
title_full_unstemmed (Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature
title_sort (Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature
author Buhler, Eve Anne
author_facet Buhler, Eve Anne
Gautreau, Pierre
Oliveira, Valter Lúcio
author_role author
author2 Gautreau, Pierre
Oliveira, Valter Lúcio
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Buhler, Eve Anne
Gautreau, Pierre
Oliveira, Valter Lúcio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mercantilização
governança ambiental
capitalismo
Comodification
Environmental governance
Capitalism
topic Mercantilização
governança ambiental
capitalismo
Comodification
Environmental governance
Capitalism
description The increasing incorporation of biophysical processes into the market since the late 1980s, especially those related to agricultural frontiers, has been interpreted by some authors in terms of "neoliberalization of nature". Such a perspective has been quite fertile in critical studies of contemporary environmental issues, but it has been questionning by suffering serious objections. Some of these objections question the theoretical foundations of the neoliberalization of nature thesis and point to a certain conceptual lack in view of the diversity of definitions of the main concepts. Another type of objection refers to its low potential for empirical analysis, since it is so broad that it does not help to understand an inevitably incomplete and partial set of processes. The present contribution proposes a balance of the theoretical and empirical debates about the neoliberalization of nature, passing by its main authors and taking as reference some empirical researches that we have carried out about agribusiness in Brazil. We will discuss about how far its limits are due to inconsistencies pointed out by its critics or, instead (and beyond), to the lack of precautions in mobilizing an approach that deserves attention and interest nonetheless.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769
10.14393/SN-v32-2020-51769
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/SN-v32-2020-51769
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769/29620
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769/29621
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Eve-Anne Buhler
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Eve-Anne Buhler
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 32 (2020); 551-564
Sociedade & Natureza; v. 32 (2020); 551-564
1982-4513
0103-1570
reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Sociedade & natureza (Online)
collection Sociedade & natureza (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br
_version_ 1799943981245661184