(Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769 |
Resumo: | The increasing incorporation of biophysical processes into the market since the late 1980s, especially those related to agricultural frontiers, has been interpreted by some authors in terms of "neoliberalization of nature". Such a perspective has been quite fertile in critical studies of contemporary environmental issues, but it has been questionning by suffering serious objections. Some of these objections question the theoretical foundations of the neoliberalization of nature thesis and point to a certain conceptual lack in view of the diversity of definitions of the main concepts. Another type of objection refers to its low potential for empirical analysis, since it is so broad that it does not help to understand an inevitably incomplete and partial set of processes. The present contribution proposes a balance of the theoretical and empirical debates about the neoliberalization of nature, passing by its main authors and taking as reference some empirical researches that we have carried out about agribusiness in Brazil. We will discuss about how far its limits are due to inconsistencies pointed out by its critics or, instead (and beyond), to the lack of precautions in mobilizing an approach that deserves attention and interest nonetheless. |
id |
UFU-6_3bca4aaa844cbc81aca7f664d7cd4f9f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/51769 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-6 |
network_name_str |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
(Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature (Im)Pertinências de uma abordagem teórica: a neoliberalização da naturezaMercantilizaçãogovernança ambientalcapitalismoComodificationEnvironmental governanceCapitalismThe increasing incorporation of biophysical processes into the market since the late 1980s, especially those related to agricultural frontiers, has been interpreted by some authors in terms of "neoliberalization of nature". Such a perspective has been quite fertile in critical studies of contemporary environmental issues, but it has been questionning by suffering serious objections. Some of these objections question the theoretical foundations of the neoliberalization of nature thesis and point to a certain conceptual lack in view of the diversity of definitions of the main concepts. Another type of objection refers to its low potential for empirical analysis, since it is so broad that it does not help to understand an inevitably incomplete and partial set of processes. The present contribution proposes a balance of the theoretical and empirical debates about the neoliberalization of nature, passing by its main authors and taking as reference some empirical researches that we have carried out about agribusiness in Brazil. We will discuss about how far its limits are due to inconsistencies pointed out by its critics or, instead (and beyond), to the lack of precautions in mobilizing an approach that deserves attention and interest nonetheless.A crescente incorporação dos processos biofísicos pelo mercado verificado a partir do final dos anos 1980, em especial aqueles relacionados aos avanços das fronteiras agrícolas, foi interpretado por alguns autores em termos de "neoliberalização da natureza". Tal perspectiva foi bastante fértil nos estudos críticos das questões ambientais contemporâneas, mas foi colocada à prova ao sofrer sérias objeções desferidas a partir de diversos ângulos. Algumas dessas objeções questionam os fundamentos teóricos da tese da neoliberalização da natureza e apontam para um certo afrouxamento conceitual frente a diversidade das definições dos conceitos adotados. Outro tipo de objeção se volta para o seu limitado potencial de análise empírica, na medida em que, de tão amplo, não auxilia na compreensão de um conjunto de processos inevitavelmente incompletos e parciais. A presente contribuição propõe um balanço dos debates teóricos e empíricos sobre a neoliberalização da natureza passando por seus principais autores e tomando por referência pesquisas empíricas que temos realizado sobre o agronegócio no Brasil. Discutiremos em que medida os seus limites se devem às inconsistências apontadas pelos seus críticos ou, ao invés (e além) disso, à falta de precauções na mobilização de uma abordagem que merece, apesar de tudo, atenção e interesse.Universidade Federal de Uberlândia2020-08-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/5176910.14393/SN-v32-2020-51769Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 32 (2020); 551-564Sociedade & Natureza; v. 32 (2020); 551-5641982-45130103-1570reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769/29620https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769/29621Copyright (c) 2020 Eve-Anne Buhlerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBuhler, Eve AnneGautreau, Pierre Oliveira, Valter Lúcio2021-07-01T16:18:20Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/51769Revistahttp://www.sociedadenatureza.ig.ufu.br/PUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/oai||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br1982-45130103-1570opendoar:2021-07-01T16:18:20Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
(Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature (Im)Pertinências de uma abordagem teórica: a neoliberalização da natureza |
title |
(Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature |
spellingShingle |
(Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature Buhler, Eve Anne Mercantilização governança ambiental capitalismo Comodification Environmental governance Capitalism |
title_short |
(Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature |
title_full |
(Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature |
title_fullStr |
(Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature |
title_full_unstemmed |
(Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature |
title_sort |
(Im)Pertinences of a theoretical approach: the neoliberalization of nature |
author |
Buhler, Eve Anne |
author_facet |
Buhler, Eve Anne Gautreau, Pierre Oliveira, Valter Lúcio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gautreau, Pierre Oliveira, Valter Lúcio |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Buhler, Eve Anne Gautreau, Pierre Oliveira, Valter Lúcio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mercantilização governança ambiental capitalismo Comodification Environmental governance Capitalism |
topic |
Mercantilização governança ambiental capitalismo Comodification Environmental governance Capitalism |
description |
The increasing incorporation of biophysical processes into the market since the late 1980s, especially those related to agricultural frontiers, has been interpreted by some authors in terms of "neoliberalization of nature". Such a perspective has been quite fertile in critical studies of contemporary environmental issues, but it has been questionning by suffering serious objections. Some of these objections question the theoretical foundations of the neoliberalization of nature thesis and point to a certain conceptual lack in view of the diversity of definitions of the main concepts. Another type of objection refers to its low potential for empirical analysis, since it is so broad that it does not help to understand an inevitably incomplete and partial set of processes. The present contribution proposes a balance of the theoretical and empirical debates about the neoliberalization of nature, passing by its main authors and taking as reference some empirical researches that we have carried out about agribusiness in Brazil. We will discuss about how far its limits are due to inconsistencies pointed out by its critics or, instead (and beyond), to the lack of precautions in mobilizing an approach that deserves attention and interest nonetheless. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769 10.14393/SN-v32-2020-51769 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/SN-v32-2020-51769 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769/29620 https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/51769/29621 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Eve-Anne Buhler info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Eve-Anne Buhler |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 32 (2020); 551-564 Sociedade & Natureza; v. 32 (2020); 551-564 1982-4513 0103-1570 reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
collection |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br |
_version_ |
1799943981245661184 |