Space, Totality and Method

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rossi, Rafael
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Sociedade & natureza (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456
Resumo: This article discusses the mediative relationship between geographical space and totality. This is a methodological reflection based on the contributions of the philosophical traditions, known as ontological and critical approaches. The qualitative distinction between the gnosiological and ontological perspective in knowledge production is indispensable in addressing this relationship between geographical space and totality. Accordingly, we first address the relationship between theory, practice, and criticism of the main subject of this article, as well as the specificity of scientific knowledge. Theory should not subordinate practice, nor should practice detract from theory. There is a dialectical reciprocity between the two elements, and theoretical knowledge must be able to translate the essence of real and effective movements. We also present the natural and social functions of the geographic space in its articulations of the totality. We conclude that geographic space must always be analyzed in combination with totality and that this dynamic, in turn, cannot be understood only as a sum of its components. This sum congregates a network of qualitative mediations generated from the reciprocal determinations that are established between the social complexes that constitute and dynamize the sum. In addition, we note the influences that production can exert in space through the predominant mediation of the socio-spatial totality.  
id UFU-6_d490e20c7f373f2bdb358ea97fab4082
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/48456
network_acronym_str UFU-6
network_name_str Sociedade & natureza (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Space, Totality and MethodEspacio, Totalidad y MétodoEspaço, Totalidade e MétodoCiênciaGeografiaTeoriaScienceGeographyTheoryThis article discusses the mediative relationship between geographical space and totality. This is a methodological reflection based on the contributions of the philosophical traditions, known as ontological and critical approaches. The qualitative distinction between the gnosiological and ontological perspective in knowledge production is indispensable in addressing this relationship between geographical space and totality. Accordingly, we first address the relationship between theory, practice, and criticism of the main subject of this article, as well as the specificity of scientific knowledge. Theory should not subordinate practice, nor should practice detract from theory. There is a dialectical reciprocity between the two elements, and theoretical knowledge must be able to translate the essence of real and effective movements. We also present the natural and social functions of the geographic space in its articulations of the totality. We conclude that geographic space must always be analyzed in combination with totality and that this dynamic, in turn, cannot be understood only as a sum of its components. This sum congregates a network of qualitative mediations generated from the reciprocal determinations that are established between the social complexes that constitute and dynamize the sum. In addition, we note the influences that production can exert in space through the predominant mediation of the socio-spatial totality.  El presente artículo aborda la relación entre el espacio geográfico en la mediación con la totalidad. Se trata de una reflexión de orden metodológico a partir de las contribuciones de la tradición filosófica conocida como abordaje ontológico y crítico. Es imprescindible, en esta cuestión, la distinción cualitativa entre la perspectiva gnosiológica y la perspectiva ontológica en el proceso de producción del conocimiento. En este sentido, abordamos, en primer lugar, la relación entre teoría, práctica y crítica para esa perspectiva en análisis, así como la especificidad del conocimiento científico. Ni la teoría debe subordinar la práctica, ni tampoco la práctica debe despreciar la teoría. Hay una reciprocidad dialéctica entre ambas y el conocimiento teórico debe permitir traducir la esencia de movimientos reales y efectivos. Posteriormente demostramos la función social del espacio geográfico en sus articulaciones con la totalidad. Concluimos que el espacio geográfico debe ser analizado siempre en articulación con la totalidad y que ésta, a su vez, no puede ser entendida apenas como una suma de sus componentes. La totalidad congrega una red de mediaciones cualitativas oriunda de las determinaciones recíprocas que se establecen entre los complejos sociales que la constituyen y dinamizan. Además, apuntamos las influencias que la producción ejerce en el espacio por la mediación predominante de la totalidad socio-espacial.O presente artigo aborda a relação entre espaço geográfico na mediação com a totalidade. Trata-se de uma reflexão de ordem metodológica a partir das contribuições da tradição filosófica conhecida como abordagem ontológica e crítica. Imprescindível, nesta questão, a distinção qualitativa entre a perspectiva gnosiológica e a perspectiva ontológica no processo de produção do conhecimento. Nesse sentido, abordamos, em primeiro lugar, a relação entre teoria, prática e crítica para essa perspectiva em análise, bem como a especificidade do conhecimento científico. Nem a teoria deve subordinar a prática, nem tampouco a prática deve desprezar a teoria. Há uma reciprocidade dialética entre ambas e o conhecimento teórico deve permitir traduzir a essência de movimentos reais e efetivos. Posteriormente demonstramos a função social do espaço geográfico em suas articulações com a totalidade. Concluímos que o espaço geográfico deve ser analisado sempre em articulação com a totalidade e que esta, por sua vez, não pode ser entendida apenas como uma somatória de seus componentes. A totalidade congrega uma rede de mediações qualitativas oriunda das determinações recíprocas que se estabelecem entre os complexos sociais que a constituem e dinamizam. Além disso, apontamos as influências que a produção exerce no espaço pela mediação predominante da totalidade sócio-espacial.Universidade Federal de Uberlândia2020-08-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/4845610.14393/SN-v32-2020-48456Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 32 (2020); 578-585Sociedade & Natureza; v. 32 (2020); 578-5851982-45130103-1570reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456/29650https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456/29651Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael Rossiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRossi, Rafael2021-07-01T16:18:20Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/48456Revistahttp://www.sociedadenatureza.ig.ufu.br/PUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/oai||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br1982-45130103-1570opendoar:2021-07-01T16:18:20Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Space, Totality and Method
Espacio, Totalidad y Método
Espaço, Totalidade e Método
title Space, Totality and Method
spellingShingle Space, Totality and Method
Rossi, Rafael
Ciência
Geografia
Teoria
Science
Geography
Theory
title_short Space, Totality and Method
title_full Space, Totality and Method
title_fullStr Space, Totality and Method
title_full_unstemmed Space, Totality and Method
title_sort Space, Totality and Method
author Rossi, Rafael
author_facet Rossi, Rafael
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rossi, Rafael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ciência
Geografia
Teoria
Science
Geography
Theory
topic Ciência
Geografia
Teoria
Science
Geography
Theory
description This article discusses the mediative relationship between geographical space and totality. This is a methodological reflection based on the contributions of the philosophical traditions, known as ontological and critical approaches. The qualitative distinction between the gnosiological and ontological perspective in knowledge production is indispensable in addressing this relationship between geographical space and totality. Accordingly, we first address the relationship between theory, practice, and criticism of the main subject of this article, as well as the specificity of scientific knowledge. Theory should not subordinate practice, nor should practice detract from theory. There is a dialectical reciprocity between the two elements, and theoretical knowledge must be able to translate the essence of real and effective movements. We also present the natural and social functions of the geographic space in its articulations of the totality. We conclude that geographic space must always be analyzed in combination with totality and that this dynamic, in turn, cannot be understood only as a sum of its components. This sum congregates a network of qualitative mediations generated from the reciprocal determinations that are established between the social complexes that constitute and dynamize the sum. In addition, we note the influences that production can exert in space through the predominant mediation of the socio-spatial totality.  
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456
10.14393/SN-v32-2020-48456
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/SN-v32-2020-48456
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456/29650
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456/29651
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael Rossi
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael Rossi
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 32 (2020); 578-585
Sociedade & Natureza; v. 32 (2020); 578-585
1982-4513
0103-1570
reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Sociedade & natureza (Online)
collection Sociedade & natureza (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br
_version_ 1799943981218398208