Space, Totality and Method
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456 |
Resumo: | This article discusses the mediative relationship between geographical space and totality. This is a methodological reflection based on the contributions of the philosophical traditions, known as ontological and critical approaches. The qualitative distinction between the gnosiological and ontological perspective in knowledge production is indispensable in addressing this relationship between geographical space and totality. Accordingly, we first address the relationship between theory, practice, and criticism of the main subject of this article, as well as the specificity of scientific knowledge. Theory should not subordinate practice, nor should practice detract from theory. There is a dialectical reciprocity between the two elements, and theoretical knowledge must be able to translate the essence of real and effective movements. We also present the natural and social functions of the geographic space in its articulations of the totality. We conclude that geographic space must always be analyzed in combination with totality and that this dynamic, in turn, cannot be understood only as a sum of its components. This sum congregates a network of qualitative mediations generated from the reciprocal determinations that are established between the social complexes that constitute and dynamize the sum. In addition, we note the influences that production can exert in space through the predominant mediation of the socio-spatial totality. |
id |
UFU-6_d490e20c7f373f2bdb358ea97fab4082 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/48456 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-6 |
network_name_str |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Space, Totality and MethodEspacio, Totalidad y MétodoEspaço, Totalidade e MétodoCiênciaGeografiaTeoriaScienceGeographyTheoryThis article discusses the mediative relationship between geographical space and totality. This is a methodological reflection based on the contributions of the philosophical traditions, known as ontological and critical approaches. The qualitative distinction between the gnosiological and ontological perspective in knowledge production is indispensable in addressing this relationship between geographical space and totality. Accordingly, we first address the relationship between theory, practice, and criticism of the main subject of this article, as well as the specificity of scientific knowledge. Theory should not subordinate practice, nor should practice detract from theory. There is a dialectical reciprocity between the two elements, and theoretical knowledge must be able to translate the essence of real and effective movements. We also present the natural and social functions of the geographic space in its articulations of the totality. We conclude that geographic space must always be analyzed in combination with totality and that this dynamic, in turn, cannot be understood only as a sum of its components. This sum congregates a network of qualitative mediations generated from the reciprocal determinations that are established between the social complexes that constitute and dynamize the sum. In addition, we note the influences that production can exert in space through the predominant mediation of the socio-spatial totality. El presente artículo aborda la relación entre el espacio geográfico en la mediación con la totalidad. Se trata de una reflexión de orden metodológico a partir de las contribuciones de la tradición filosófica conocida como abordaje ontológico y crítico. Es imprescindible, en esta cuestión, la distinción cualitativa entre la perspectiva gnosiológica y la perspectiva ontológica en el proceso de producción del conocimiento. En este sentido, abordamos, en primer lugar, la relación entre teoría, práctica y crítica para esa perspectiva en análisis, así como la especificidad del conocimiento científico. Ni la teoría debe subordinar la práctica, ni tampoco la práctica debe despreciar la teoría. Hay una reciprocidad dialéctica entre ambas y el conocimiento teórico debe permitir traducir la esencia de movimientos reales y efectivos. Posteriormente demostramos la función social del espacio geográfico en sus articulaciones con la totalidad. Concluimos que el espacio geográfico debe ser analizado siempre en articulación con la totalidad y que ésta, a su vez, no puede ser entendida apenas como una suma de sus componentes. La totalidad congrega una red de mediaciones cualitativas oriunda de las determinaciones recíprocas que se establecen entre los complejos sociales que la constituyen y dinamizan. Además, apuntamos las influencias que la producción ejerce en el espacio por la mediación predominante de la totalidad socio-espacial.O presente artigo aborda a relação entre espaço geográfico na mediação com a totalidade. Trata-se de uma reflexão de ordem metodológica a partir das contribuições da tradição filosófica conhecida como abordagem ontológica e crítica. Imprescindível, nesta questão, a distinção qualitativa entre a perspectiva gnosiológica e a perspectiva ontológica no processo de produção do conhecimento. Nesse sentido, abordamos, em primeiro lugar, a relação entre teoria, prática e crítica para essa perspectiva em análise, bem como a especificidade do conhecimento científico. Nem a teoria deve subordinar a prática, nem tampouco a prática deve desprezar a teoria. Há uma reciprocidade dialética entre ambas e o conhecimento teórico deve permitir traduzir a essência de movimentos reais e efetivos. Posteriormente demonstramos a função social do espaço geográfico em suas articulações com a totalidade. Concluímos que o espaço geográfico deve ser analisado sempre em articulação com a totalidade e que esta, por sua vez, não pode ser entendida apenas como uma somatória de seus componentes. A totalidade congrega uma rede de mediações qualitativas oriunda das determinações recíprocas que se estabelecem entre os complexos sociais que a constituem e dinamizam. Além disso, apontamos as influências que a produção exerce no espaço pela mediação predominante da totalidade sócio-espacial.Universidade Federal de Uberlândia2020-08-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/4845610.14393/SN-v32-2020-48456Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 32 (2020); 578-585Sociedade & Natureza; v. 32 (2020); 578-5851982-45130103-1570reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456/29650https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456/29651Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael Rossiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRossi, Rafael2021-07-01T16:18:20Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/48456Revistahttp://www.sociedadenatureza.ig.ufu.br/PUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/oai||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br1982-45130103-1570opendoar:2021-07-01T16:18:20Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Space, Totality and Method Espacio, Totalidad y Método Espaço, Totalidade e Método |
title |
Space, Totality and Method |
spellingShingle |
Space, Totality and Method Rossi, Rafael Ciência Geografia Teoria Science Geography Theory |
title_short |
Space, Totality and Method |
title_full |
Space, Totality and Method |
title_fullStr |
Space, Totality and Method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Space, Totality and Method |
title_sort |
Space, Totality and Method |
author |
Rossi, Rafael |
author_facet |
Rossi, Rafael |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rossi, Rafael |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Geografia Teoria Science Geography Theory |
topic |
Ciência Geografia Teoria Science Geography Theory |
description |
This article discusses the mediative relationship between geographical space and totality. This is a methodological reflection based on the contributions of the philosophical traditions, known as ontological and critical approaches. The qualitative distinction between the gnosiological and ontological perspective in knowledge production is indispensable in addressing this relationship between geographical space and totality. Accordingly, we first address the relationship between theory, practice, and criticism of the main subject of this article, as well as the specificity of scientific knowledge. Theory should not subordinate practice, nor should practice detract from theory. There is a dialectical reciprocity between the two elements, and theoretical knowledge must be able to translate the essence of real and effective movements. We also present the natural and social functions of the geographic space in its articulations of the totality. We conclude that geographic space must always be analyzed in combination with totality and that this dynamic, in turn, cannot be understood only as a sum of its components. This sum congregates a network of qualitative mediations generated from the reciprocal determinations that are established between the social complexes that constitute and dynamize the sum. In addition, we note the influences that production can exert in space through the predominant mediation of the socio-spatial totality. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456 10.14393/SN-v32-2020-48456 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/SN-v32-2020-48456 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456/29650 https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/48456/29651 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael Rossi info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael Rossi |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 32 (2020); 578-585 Sociedade & Natureza; v. 32 (2020); 578-585 1982-4513 0103-1570 reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
collection |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br |
_version_ |
1799943981218398208 |