Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/71211 |
Resumo: | Challenges are observed worldwide in the cost of urban drainage through fees compromising the sustainability of its management. Strategies are needed for greater involvement of users of the drainage system, assuming their responsibility for the cost of this system and collaborating with the system on their properties through the containment and delay of the surface runoff of rainwater to the public network from sustainable technologies. Incentives for these users to implement technologies that minimize the outflow of their properties can be an essential strategy for implementing fees. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate, through a systematic review (SR), the values and methods of drainage fees and incentives for urban environmental services provided by users of drainage systems. The SR was developed from a search on the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus platforms, whose data were analyzed using the StArt system. Among the 199 articles studied and published between 2010 and 2021, it was possible to relate fees and incentives practiced. Concerning fee models, the ERU method (Equivalent Residential Unit) was predominant. Regarding the incentive models, the most used was tax reduction. |
id |
UFU-6_d935c99151b5d62e0d0e006dbb245a89 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/71211 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-6 |
network_name_str |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban DrainageModels and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban DrainageRevisão sistemáticaPagamento por serviços ambientais urbanosDrainage taxDrenagem sustentávelChallenges are observed worldwide in the cost of urban drainage through fees compromising the sustainability of its management. Strategies are needed for greater involvement of users of the drainage system, assuming their responsibility for the cost of this system and collaborating with the system on their properties through the containment and delay of the surface runoff of rainwater to the public network from sustainable technologies. Incentives for these users to implement technologies that minimize the outflow of their properties can be an essential strategy for implementing fees. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate, through a systematic review (SR), the values and methods of drainage fees and incentives for urban environmental services provided by users of drainage systems. The SR was developed from a search on the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus platforms, whose data were analyzed using the StArt system. Among the 199 articles studied and published between 2010 and 2021, it was possible to relate fees and incentives practiced. Concerning fee models, the ERU method (Equivalent Residential Unit) was predominant. Regarding the incentive models, the most used was tax reduction.Challenges are observed worldwide in the cost of urban drainage through fees compromising the sustainability of its management. Strategies are needed for greater involvement of users of the drainage system, assuming their responsibility for the cost of this system and collaborating with the system on their properties through the containment and delay of the surface runoff of rainwater to the public network from sustainable technologies. Incentives for these users to implement technologies that minimize the outflow of their properties can be an essential strategy for implementing fees. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate, through a systematic review (SR), the values and methods of drainage fees and incentives for urban environmental services provided by users of drainage systems. The SR was developed from a search on the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus platforms, whose data were analyzed using the StArt system. Among the 199 articles studied and published between 2010 and 2021, it was possible to relate fees and incentives practiced. Concerning fee models, the ERU method (Equivalent Residential Unit) was predominant. Regarding the incentive models, the most used was tax reduction.Universidade Federal de Uberlândia2024-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/7121110.14393/SN-v36-2024-71211Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2024): Sociedade & NaturezaSociedade & Natureza; v. 36 n. 1 (2024): Sociedade & Natureza1982-45130103-1570reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/71211/37986Copyright (c) 2023 Ana Paula Camargo de Vicente, Karla Maria Silva de Faria, Klebber Teodomiro Martins Formigahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVicente, Ana Paula Camargo deFaria, Karla Maria Silva deFormiga, Klebber Teodomiro Martins2024-05-13T15:01:06Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/71211Revistahttp://www.sociedadenatureza.ig.ufu.br/PUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/oai||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br1982-45130103-1570opendoar:2024-05-13T15:01:06Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage |
title |
Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage |
spellingShingle |
Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage Vicente, Ana Paula Camargo de Revisão sistemática Pagamento por serviços ambientais urbanos Drainage tax Drenagem sustentável |
title_short |
Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage |
title_full |
Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage |
title_fullStr |
Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage |
title_sort |
Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage |
author |
Vicente, Ana Paula Camargo de |
author_facet |
Vicente, Ana Paula Camargo de Faria, Karla Maria Silva de Formiga, Klebber Teodomiro Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Faria, Karla Maria Silva de Formiga, Klebber Teodomiro Martins |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vicente, Ana Paula Camargo de Faria, Karla Maria Silva de Formiga, Klebber Teodomiro Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Revisão sistemática Pagamento por serviços ambientais urbanos Drainage tax Drenagem sustentável |
topic |
Revisão sistemática Pagamento por serviços ambientais urbanos Drainage tax Drenagem sustentável |
description |
Challenges are observed worldwide in the cost of urban drainage through fees compromising the sustainability of its management. Strategies are needed for greater involvement of users of the drainage system, assuming their responsibility for the cost of this system and collaborating with the system on their properties through the containment and delay of the surface runoff of rainwater to the public network from sustainable technologies. Incentives for these users to implement technologies that minimize the outflow of their properties can be an essential strategy for implementing fees. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate, through a systematic review (SR), the values and methods of drainage fees and incentives for urban environmental services provided by users of drainage systems. The SR was developed from a search on the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus platforms, whose data were analyzed using the StArt system. Among the 199 articles studied and published between 2010 and 2021, it was possible to relate fees and incentives practiced. Concerning fee models, the ERU method (Equivalent Residential Unit) was predominant. Regarding the incentive models, the most used was tax reduction. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-02-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/71211 10.14393/SN-v36-2024-71211 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/71211 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/SN-v36-2024-71211 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/71211/37986 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2024): Sociedade & Natureza Sociedade & Natureza; v. 36 n. 1 (2024): Sociedade & Natureza 1982-4513 0103-1570 reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
collection |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br |
_version_ |
1799943977501196288 |