Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobiana

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baptista, Anderson Lopes
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFU
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/18397
Resumo: Bovine respiratory diseases (DRB) are multifactorial, affect productive and sanitary indices, and metaphylaxis is an alternative for DRB challenges in confinement. The aim of this study was to evaluate metaphylaxis with oxytetracycline and tildipirosin in these systems. In the retrospective study, 42,997 animals were used: control (n=20,763), oxytetracycline (n=11,896) and tildipirosin (n=10,338), being low, medium and high risk for DRB, respectively. In the second study, 1,780 uncastrated male Nellore cattle from 18 to 24 months old, mean weight of entry 366.9 ± 19.9 kg, which covered 657.9 ± 302.3 km and rested for 10.4 ± 15.6 days. They were divided in experiment 1 (n=1,780), control (n=628) and metaphylaxis (n=1,152) and 2 (n=1,152) animals divided into untreated (n=568) and treated (n=584). In the first study, the general morbidity was 7.26% with a difference (P<0.001) in the oxytetracycline protocol (8.36%) and control (6.75%) and tildipirosin (7.04%). Overall mortality was 0.06%, 0.03% in high-risk animals (tildipirosin), 0.04% in control (P=0.197) and 0.017% in oxytetracycline. The mean daily gain (ADG) increased by 1.21% (oxytetracycline) and 6.17% (tildipirosin) compared to those without metaphylaxis (P<0.001), and ADG was higher in healthy and tildipirosin patients. In the second study, the general morbidity of experiment 1 was 4.77%, 6.5% and 3.8% in the control and metaphylaxis groups (P=0.02), respectively. There were no DRB deaths. Among productive indexes, CDG (P = 0.002) and ADG (P=0.039) were higher in animals of the metaphylaxis group. In experiment 2, overall morbidity was 3.8%, 4.6% and 3.08% in the untreated and treated groups, respectively (P=0.6914). The mean final weight of the animals from the untreated group (532.30 ± 34.94 kg) presented a tendency (P=0.0579) to be lower than that of the treated group (535.40 ± 34.20 kg). The same was observed in the evaluation of ADG, but without difference (P=0.0558). Regarding CDG, there was no difference between the groups (P=0.3524). It was concluded that metaphylaxis with tildiprosin, performed in half of animals with high risk for respiratory diseases at the entrance of confinement, reduces morbidity and improves productive performance when compared to those without metaphylaxis.
id UFU_e228fefb0c0d217d25d9dd0ab88b305a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufu.br:123456789/18397
network_acronym_str UFU
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFU
repository_id_str
spelling Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobianaProdutiveand sanitary evaluation in feedlot cattle under antimicrobial metaphylaxisVeterináriaBovino - DoençasConfinamento (Animais)Doenças respiratóriasNeloreOxitetraciclinaTildipirosinaFeedlotOxitetracyclinRespiratory diseasesTildipirosinCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIABovine respiratory diseases (DRB) are multifactorial, affect productive and sanitary indices, and metaphylaxis is an alternative for DRB challenges in confinement. The aim of this study was to evaluate metaphylaxis with oxytetracycline and tildipirosin in these systems. In the retrospective study, 42,997 animals were used: control (n=20,763), oxytetracycline (n=11,896) and tildipirosin (n=10,338), being low, medium and high risk for DRB, respectively. In the second study, 1,780 uncastrated male Nellore cattle from 18 to 24 months old, mean weight of entry 366.9 ± 19.9 kg, which covered 657.9 ± 302.3 km and rested for 10.4 ± 15.6 days. They were divided in experiment 1 (n=1,780), control (n=628) and metaphylaxis (n=1,152) and 2 (n=1,152) animals divided into untreated (n=568) and treated (n=584). In the first study, the general morbidity was 7.26% with a difference (P<0.001) in the oxytetracycline protocol (8.36%) and control (6.75%) and tildipirosin (7.04%). Overall mortality was 0.06%, 0.03% in high-risk animals (tildipirosin), 0.04% in control (P=0.197) and 0.017% in oxytetracycline. The mean daily gain (ADG) increased by 1.21% (oxytetracycline) and 6.17% (tildipirosin) compared to those without metaphylaxis (P<0.001), and ADG was higher in healthy and tildipirosin patients. In the second study, the general morbidity of experiment 1 was 4.77%, 6.5% and 3.8% in the control and metaphylaxis groups (P=0.02), respectively. There were no DRB deaths. Among productive indexes, CDG (P = 0.002) and ADG (P=0.039) were higher in animals of the metaphylaxis group. In experiment 2, overall morbidity was 3.8%, 4.6% and 3.08% in the untreated and treated groups, respectively (P=0.6914). The mean final weight of the animals from the untreated group (532.30 ± 34.94 kg) presented a tendency (P=0.0579) to be lower than that of the treated group (535.40 ± 34.20 kg). The same was observed in the evaluation of ADG, but without difference (P=0.0558). Regarding CDG, there was no difference between the groups (P=0.3524). It was concluded that metaphylaxis with tildiprosin, performed in half of animals with high risk for respiratory diseases at the entrance of confinement, reduces morbidity and improves productive performance when compared to those without metaphylaxis.Dissertação (Mestrado)Doenças respiratórias dos bovinos (DRB) são multifatoriais, afetam índices produtivos e sanitários, e a metafilaxia é uma alternativa para desafios das DRB em confinamentos. Objetivou-se avaliar a metafilaxia com oxitetraciclina e tildipirosina nesses sistemas. No estudo retrospectivo, utilizou-se 42.997 animais: controle (n=20.763), oxitetraciclina (n=11.896) e tildipirosina (n=10.338), sendo de baixo, médio e alto risco para DRB, respectivamente. No segundo estudo, utilizou-se 1.780 bovinos Nelores machos não castrados, de 18 a 24 meses, peso médio de entrada 366,9 ± 19,9 Kg, que percorreram 657,9 ± 302,3 Km e descansaram por 10,4 ± 15,6 dias. Foram divididos em experimentos 1 (n=1.780), animais controle (n=628) e metafilaxia (n=1.152) e 2 (n= 1.152), divididos em não tratados (n=568) e tratados (n=584). No primeiro estudo, a morbidade geral foi 7,26% com diferença (P<0,001) do protocolo oxitetraciclina (8,36%) e o controle (6,75%) e tildipirosina (7,04%). A mortalidade geral foi 0,06%, 0,03% nos animais de alto risco (tildipirosina), 0,04% no controle (P=0,197) e 0,017% no oxitetraciclina. O ganho médio diário (GMD) aumentou 1,21% (oxitetraciclina) e 6,17% (tildipirosina) em relação aos sem metafilaxia (P<0,001) e, o GMD foi maior nos saudáveis e doentes com tildipirosina. No segundo estudo, a morbidade geral do experimento 1 foi 4,77%, 6,5% e 3,8% nos grupos controle e metafilaxia (P=0,02), respectivamente. Não houve mortes por DRB. Dentre índices produtivos, o GDC (P=0,002) e o GPD (P=0,039), foram maiores nos animais do grupo metafilaxia. No experimento 2, a morbidade geral foi 3,8%, 4,6 % e 3,08% nos grupos não tratado e tratado, respectivamente (P=0,6914). O peso médio final dos animais do grupo não tratado (532,30 ± 34,94 Kg) apresentou tendência (P=0,0579) em ser menor que o do Grupo tratado (535,40 ± 34,20 Kg). O mesmo foi observado na avaliação do GPD, porém sem diferença (P = 0,0558). Quanto ao GDC não houve diferença entre os grupos (P =0,3524). Conclui-se que a metafilaxia com tildipirosina, realizada em metade de animais com alto risco para doenças respiratórias na entrada de confinamentos, reduz a morbidade e melhora o desempenho produtivo quando comparados àqueles sem metafilaxia.Universidade Federal de UberlândiaBrasilPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências VeterináriasSaut, João Paulo Elsenhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4706374U4Nogueira, Geison Morelhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4133201T4Facury Filho, Elias Jorgehttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4784181H2Baptista, Anderson Lopes2017-04-24T17:50:29Z2017-04-24T17:50:29Z2017-01-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfBAPTISTA, Anderson Lopes. Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobiana. 2017. 60 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Veterinárias) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2017.https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/18397ufu.http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2017.108porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFUinstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFU2019-02-04T12:15:38Zoai:repositorio.ufu.br:123456789/18397Repositório InstitucionalONGhttp://repositorio.ufu.br/oai/requestdiinf@dirbi.ufu.bropendoar:2019-02-04T12:15:38Repositório Institucional da UFU - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobiana
Produtiveand sanitary evaluation in feedlot cattle under antimicrobial metaphylaxis
title Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobiana
spellingShingle Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobiana
Baptista, Anderson Lopes
Veterinária
Bovino - Doenças
Confinamento (Animais)
Doenças respiratórias
Nelore
Oxitetraciclina
Tildipirosina
Feedlot
Oxitetracyclin
Respiratory diseases
Tildipirosin
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
title_short Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobiana
title_full Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobiana
title_fullStr Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobiana
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobiana
title_sort Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobiana
author Baptista, Anderson Lopes
author_facet Baptista, Anderson Lopes
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Saut, João Paulo Elsen
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4706374U4
Nogueira, Geison Morel
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4133201T4
Facury Filho, Elias Jorge
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4784181H2
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baptista, Anderson Lopes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Veterinária
Bovino - Doenças
Confinamento (Animais)
Doenças respiratórias
Nelore
Oxitetraciclina
Tildipirosina
Feedlot
Oxitetracyclin
Respiratory diseases
Tildipirosin
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
topic Veterinária
Bovino - Doenças
Confinamento (Animais)
Doenças respiratórias
Nelore
Oxitetraciclina
Tildipirosina
Feedlot
Oxitetracyclin
Respiratory diseases
Tildipirosin
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
description Bovine respiratory diseases (DRB) are multifactorial, affect productive and sanitary indices, and metaphylaxis is an alternative for DRB challenges in confinement. The aim of this study was to evaluate metaphylaxis with oxytetracycline and tildipirosin in these systems. In the retrospective study, 42,997 animals were used: control (n=20,763), oxytetracycline (n=11,896) and tildipirosin (n=10,338), being low, medium and high risk for DRB, respectively. In the second study, 1,780 uncastrated male Nellore cattle from 18 to 24 months old, mean weight of entry 366.9 ± 19.9 kg, which covered 657.9 ± 302.3 km and rested for 10.4 ± 15.6 days. They were divided in experiment 1 (n=1,780), control (n=628) and metaphylaxis (n=1,152) and 2 (n=1,152) animals divided into untreated (n=568) and treated (n=584). In the first study, the general morbidity was 7.26% with a difference (P<0.001) in the oxytetracycline protocol (8.36%) and control (6.75%) and tildipirosin (7.04%). Overall mortality was 0.06%, 0.03% in high-risk animals (tildipirosin), 0.04% in control (P=0.197) and 0.017% in oxytetracycline. The mean daily gain (ADG) increased by 1.21% (oxytetracycline) and 6.17% (tildipirosin) compared to those without metaphylaxis (P<0.001), and ADG was higher in healthy and tildipirosin patients. In the second study, the general morbidity of experiment 1 was 4.77%, 6.5% and 3.8% in the control and metaphylaxis groups (P=0.02), respectively. There were no DRB deaths. Among productive indexes, CDG (P = 0.002) and ADG (P=0.039) were higher in animals of the metaphylaxis group. In experiment 2, overall morbidity was 3.8%, 4.6% and 3.08% in the untreated and treated groups, respectively (P=0.6914). The mean final weight of the animals from the untreated group (532.30 ± 34.94 kg) presented a tendency (P=0.0579) to be lower than that of the treated group (535.40 ± 34.20 kg). The same was observed in the evaluation of ADG, but without difference (P=0.0558). Regarding CDG, there was no difference between the groups (P=0.3524). It was concluded that metaphylaxis with tildiprosin, performed in half of animals with high risk for respiratory diseases at the entrance of confinement, reduces morbidity and improves productive performance when compared to those without metaphylaxis.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-24T17:50:29Z
2017-04-24T17:50:29Z
2017-01-16
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv BAPTISTA, Anderson Lopes. Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobiana. 2017. 60 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Veterinárias) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2017.
https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/18397
ufu.http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2017.108
identifier_str_mv BAPTISTA, Anderson Lopes. Avaliação produtiva e sanitária em bovinos confinados sob metafilaxia antimicrobiana. 2017. 60 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Veterinárias) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2017.
ufu.http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2017.108
url https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/18397
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Brasil
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Veterinárias
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Brasil
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Veterinárias
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFU
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFU
collection Repositório Institucional da UFU
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFU - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv diinf@dirbi.ufu.br
_version_ 1805569682999083008