Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Ceres |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2016000400477 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT In field experiments, it is often assumed that errors are statistically independent, but not always this condition is met, compromising the results. An inappropriate choice of the analytical model can compromise the efficiency of breeding programs in preventing unpromising genotypes from being selected and maintained in the next selection cycles resulting in waste of time and resources. The objective of this study was to evaluate the spatial dependence of errors in experiments evaluating grain yield of bean progenies using analyses in lattice and randomized blocks. And also evaluate the efficiency of geostatistical models to describe the structure of spatial variability of errors. The data used in this study derived from experiments arranged in the lattice design and analyzed as lattice or as randomized blocks. The Durbin-Watson test was used to verify the existence of spatial autocorrelation. The theoretical semivariogram was fitted using geostatistical models (exponential, spherical and Gaussian) to describe the spatial variability of errors. The likelihood ratio test was applied to assess the significance of the geostatistical model parameters. Of the eight experiments evaluated, five had moderate spatial dependence for the randomized blocks analysis and one for both analyses, in lattice and randomized blocks. The area of the experiments was not a determinant factor of the spatial dependence. The spherical, exponential and Gaussian geostatistical models with nugget effect were suitable to represent the spatial structure in the randomized block analysis. The analysis in lattice was efficient to ensure the independence of errors. |
id |
UFV-5_b5d02fbfbbcdc7239c78245a4be75108 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-737X2016000400477 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV-5 |
network_name_str |
Revista Ceres |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yieldspatial analysisspatial autocorrelationsemivariogramDurbin-Watson testlikelihood ratio testprogenies of Phaseolus vulgaris LABSTRACT In field experiments, it is often assumed that errors are statistically independent, but not always this condition is met, compromising the results. An inappropriate choice of the analytical model can compromise the efficiency of breeding programs in preventing unpromising genotypes from being selected and maintained in the next selection cycles resulting in waste of time and resources. The objective of this study was to evaluate the spatial dependence of errors in experiments evaluating grain yield of bean progenies using analyses in lattice and randomized blocks. And also evaluate the efficiency of geostatistical models to describe the structure of spatial variability of errors. The data used in this study derived from experiments arranged in the lattice design and analyzed as lattice or as randomized blocks. The Durbin-Watson test was used to verify the existence of spatial autocorrelation. The theoretical semivariogram was fitted using geostatistical models (exponential, spherical and Gaussian) to describe the spatial variability of errors. The likelihood ratio test was applied to assess the significance of the geostatistical model parameters. Of the eight experiments evaluated, five had moderate spatial dependence for the randomized blocks analysis and one for both analyses, in lattice and randomized blocks. The area of the experiments was not a determinant factor of the spatial dependence. The spherical, exponential and Gaussian geostatistical models with nugget effect were suitable to represent the spatial structure in the randomized block analysis. The analysis in lattice was efficient to ensure the independence of errors.Universidade Federal de Viçosa2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2016000400477Revista Ceres v.63 n.4 2016reponame:Revista Ceresinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFV10.1590/0034-737X201663040007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Michele Jorge daCarneiro,Antonio Policarpo SouzaFeres,Andréia Luiza GonzagaCarneiro,José Eustáquio SouzaSantos,Nerilson TerraCecon,Paulo Robertoeng2016-09-14T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield |
title |
Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield |
spellingShingle |
Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield Silva,Michele Jorge da spatial analysis spatial autocorrelation semivariogram Durbin-Watson test likelihood ratio test progenies of Phaseolus vulgaris L |
title_short |
Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield |
title_full |
Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield |
title_fullStr |
Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield |
title_full_unstemmed |
Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield |
title_sort |
Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield |
author |
Silva,Michele Jorge da |
author_facet |
Silva,Michele Jorge da Carneiro,Antonio Policarpo Souza Feres,Andréia Luiza Gonzaga Carneiro,José Eustáquio Souza Santos,Nerilson Terra Cecon,Paulo Roberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carneiro,Antonio Policarpo Souza Feres,Andréia Luiza Gonzaga Carneiro,José Eustáquio Souza Santos,Nerilson Terra Cecon,Paulo Roberto |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva,Michele Jorge da Carneiro,Antonio Policarpo Souza Feres,Andréia Luiza Gonzaga Carneiro,José Eustáquio Souza Santos,Nerilson Terra Cecon,Paulo Roberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
spatial analysis spatial autocorrelation semivariogram Durbin-Watson test likelihood ratio test progenies of Phaseolus vulgaris L |
topic |
spatial analysis spatial autocorrelation semivariogram Durbin-Watson test likelihood ratio test progenies of Phaseolus vulgaris L |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
ABSTRACT In field experiments, it is often assumed that errors are statistically independent, but not always this condition is met, compromising the results. An inappropriate choice of the analytical model can compromise the efficiency of breeding programs in preventing unpromising genotypes from being selected and maintained in the next selection cycles resulting in waste of time and resources. The objective of this study was to evaluate the spatial dependence of errors in experiments evaluating grain yield of bean progenies using analyses in lattice and randomized blocks. And also evaluate the efficiency of geostatistical models to describe the structure of spatial variability of errors. The data used in this study derived from experiments arranged in the lattice design and analyzed as lattice or as randomized blocks. The Durbin-Watson test was used to verify the existence of spatial autocorrelation. The theoretical semivariogram was fitted using geostatistical models (exponential, spherical and Gaussian) to describe the spatial variability of errors. The likelihood ratio test was applied to assess the significance of the geostatistical model parameters. Of the eight experiments evaluated, five had moderate spatial dependence for the randomized blocks analysis and one for both analyses, in lattice and randomized blocks. The area of the experiments was not a determinant factor of the spatial dependence. The spherical, exponential and Gaussian geostatistical models with nugget effect were suitable to represent the spatial structure in the randomized block analysis. The analysis in lattice was efficient to ensure the independence of errors. |
description |
ABSTRACT In field experiments, it is often assumed that errors are statistically independent, but not always this condition is met, compromising the results. An inappropriate choice of the analytical model can compromise the efficiency of breeding programs in preventing unpromising genotypes from being selected and maintained in the next selection cycles resulting in waste of time and resources. The objective of this study was to evaluate the spatial dependence of errors in experiments evaluating grain yield of bean progenies using analyses in lattice and randomized blocks. And also evaluate the efficiency of geostatistical models to describe the structure of spatial variability of errors. The data used in this study derived from experiments arranged in the lattice design and analyzed as lattice or as randomized blocks. The Durbin-Watson test was used to verify the existence of spatial autocorrelation. The theoretical semivariogram was fitted using geostatistical models (exponential, spherical and Gaussian) to describe the spatial variability of errors. The likelihood ratio test was applied to assess the significance of the geostatistical model parameters. Of the eight experiments evaluated, five had moderate spatial dependence for the randomized blocks analysis and one for both analyses, in lattice and randomized blocks. The area of the experiments was not a determinant factor of the spatial dependence. The spherical, exponential and Gaussian geostatistical models with nugget effect were suitable to represent the spatial structure in the randomized block analysis. The analysis in lattice was efficient to ensure the independence of errors. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2016000400477 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2016000400477 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-737X201663040007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ceres v.63 n.4 2016 reponame:Revista Ceres instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
Revista Ceres |
collection |
Revista Ceres |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1728006782403477504 |