Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Michele Jorge da
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Carneiro,Antonio Policarpo Souza, Feres,Andréia Luiza Gonzaga, Carneiro,José Eustáquio Souza, Santos,Nerilson Terra, Cecon,Paulo Roberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Ceres
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2016000400477
Resumo: ABSTRACT In field experiments, it is often assumed that errors are statistically independent, but not always this condition is met, compromising the results. An inappropriate choice of the analytical model can compromise the efficiency of breeding programs in preventing unpromising genotypes from being selected and maintained in the next selection cycles resulting in waste of time and resources. The objective of this study was to evaluate the spatial dependence of errors in experiments evaluating grain yield of bean progenies using analyses in lattice and randomized blocks. And also evaluate the efficiency of geostatistical models to describe the structure of spatial variability of errors. The data used in this study derived from experiments arranged in the lattice design and analyzed as lattice or as randomized blocks. The Durbin-Watson test was used to verify the existence of spatial autocorrelation. The theoretical semivariogram was fitted using geostatistical models (exponential, spherical and Gaussian) to describe the spatial variability of errors. The likelihood ratio test was applied to assess the significance of the geostatistical model parameters. Of the eight experiments evaluated, five had moderate spatial dependence for the randomized blocks analysis and one for both analyses, in lattice and randomized blocks. The area of the experiments was not a determinant factor of the spatial dependence. The spherical, exponential and Gaussian geostatistical models with nugget effect were suitable to represent the spatial structure in the randomized block analysis. The analysis in lattice was efficient to ensure the independence of errors.
id UFV-5_b5d02fbfbbcdc7239c78245a4be75108
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-737X2016000400477
network_acronym_str UFV-5
network_name_str Revista Ceres
repository_id_str
spelling Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yieldspatial analysisspatial autocorrelationsemivariogramDurbin-Watson testlikelihood ratio testprogenies of Phaseolus vulgaris LABSTRACT In field experiments, it is often assumed that errors are statistically independent, but not always this condition is met, compromising the results. An inappropriate choice of the analytical model can compromise the efficiency of breeding programs in preventing unpromising genotypes from being selected and maintained in the next selection cycles resulting in waste of time and resources. The objective of this study was to evaluate the spatial dependence of errors in experiments evaluating grain yield of bean progenies using analyses in lattice and randomized blocks. And also evaluate the efficiency of geostatistical models to describe the structure of spatial variability of errors. The data used in this study derived from experiments arranged in the lattice design and analyzed as lattice or as randomized blocks. The Durbin-Watson test was used to verify the existence of spatial autocorrelation. The theoretical semivariogram was fitted using geostatistical models (exponential, spherical and Gaussian) to describe the spatial variability of errors. The likelihood ratio test was applied to assess the significance of the geostatistical model parameters. Of the eight experiments evaluated, five had moderate spatial dependence for the randomized blocks analysis and one for both analyses, in lattice and randomized blocks. The area of the experiments was not a determinant factor of the spatial dependence. The spherical, exponential and Gaussian geostatistical models with nugget effect were suitable to represent the spatial structure in the randomized block analysis. The analysis in lattice was efficient to ensure the independence of errors.Universidade Federal de Viçosa2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2016000400477Revista Ceres v.63 n.4 2016reponame:Revista Ceresinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFV10.1590/0034-737X201663040007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Michele Jorge daCarneiro,Antonio Policarpo SouzaFeres,Andréia Luiza GonzagaCarneiro,José Eustáquio SouzaSantos,Nerilson TerraCecon,Paulo Robertoeng2016-09-14T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield
title Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield
spellingShingle Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield
Silva,Michele Jorge da
spatial analysis
spatial autocorrelation
semivariogram
Durbin-Watson test
likelihood ratio test
progenies of Phaseolus vulgaris L
title_short Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield
title_full Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield
title_fullStr Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield
title_full_unstemmed Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield
title_sort Spatial dependence in experiments of progeny selection for bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield
author Silva,Michele Jorge da
author_facet Silva,Michele Jorge da
Carneiro,Antonio Policarpo Souza
Feres,Andréia Luiza Gonzaga
Carneiro,José Eustáquio Souza
Santos,Nerilson Terra
Cecon,Paulo Roberto
author_role author
author2 Carneiro,Antonio Policarpo Souza
Feres,Andréia Luiza Gonzaga
Carneiro,José Eustáquio Souza
Santos,Nerilson Terra
Cecon,Paulo Roberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Michele Jorge da
Carneiro,Antonio Policarpo Souza
Feres,Andréia Luiza Gonzaga
Carneiro,José Eustáquio Souza
Santos,Nerilson Terra
Cecon,Paulo Roberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv spatial analysis
spatial autocorrelation
semivariogram
Durbin-Watson test
likelihood ratio test
progenies of Phaseolus vulgaris L
topic spatial analysis
spatial autocorrelation
semivariogram
Durbin-Watson test
likelihood ratio test
progenies of Phaseolus vulgaris L
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv ABSTRACT In field experiments, it is often assumed that errors are statistically independent, but not always this condition is met, compromising the results. An inappropriate choice of the analytical model can compromise the efficiency of breeding programs in preventing unpromising genotypes from being selected and maintained in the next selection cycles resulting in waste of time and resources. The objective of this study was to evaluate the spatial dependence of errors in experiments evaluating grain yield of bean progenies using analyses in lattice and randomized blocks. And also evaluate the efficiency of geostatistical models to describe the structure of spatial variability of errors. The data used in this study derived from experiments arranged in the lattice design and analyzed as lattice or as randomized blocks. The Durbin-Watson test was used to verify the existence of spatial autocorrelation. The theoretical semivariogram was fitted using geostatistical models (exponential, spherical and Gaussian) to describe the spatial variability of errors. The likelihood ratio test was applied to assess the significance of the geostatistical model parameters. Of the eight experiments evaluated, five had moderate spatial dependence for the randomized blocks analysis and one for both analyses, in lattice and randomized blocks. The area of the experiments was not a determinant factor of the spatial dependence. The spherical, exponential and Gaussian geostatistical models with nugget effect were suitable to represent the spatial structure in the randomized block analysis. The analysis in lattice was efficient to ensure the independence of errors.
description ABSTRACT In field experiments, it is often assumed that errors are statistically independent, but not always this condition is met, compromising the results. An inappropriate choice of the analytical model can compromise the efficiency of breeding programs in preventing unpromising genotypes from being selected and maintained in the next selection cycles resulting in waste of time and resources. The objective of this study was to evaluate the spatial dependence of errors in experiments evaluating grain yield of bean progenies using analyses in lattice and randomized blocks. And also evaluate the efficiency of geostatistical models to describe the structure of spatial variability of errors. The data used in this study derived from experiments arranged in the lattice design and analyzed as lattice or as randomized blocks. The Durbin-Watson test was used to verify the existence of spatial autocorrelation. The theoretical semivariogram was fitted using geostatistical models (exponential, spherical and Gaussian) to describe the spatial variability of errors. The likelihood ratio test was applied to assess the significance of the geostatistical model parameters. Of the eight experiments evaluated, five had moderate spatial dependence for the randomized blocks analysis and one for both analyses, in lattice and randomized blocks. The area of the experiments was not a determinant factor of the spatial dependence. The spherical, exponential and Gaussian geostatistical models with nugget effect were suitable to represent the spatial structure in the randomized block analysis. The analysis in lattice was efficient to ensure the independence of errors.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2016000400477
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2016000400477
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0034-737X201663040007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ceres v.63 n.4 2016
reponame:Revista Ceres
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str Revista Ceres
collection Revista Ceres
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1728006782403477504