Yield and grape must quality of the IAC 138-22 ‘Máximo’ submitted to canopy management

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hernandes,José Luiz
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Pedro Júnior,Mário José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Ceres
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2018000600527
Resumo: ABSTRACT Grape cultivar IAC 138-22 'Máximo' grafted on IAC 766 ‘Campinas’ and IAC 572 ‘Jales’ rootstocks and trained in upright trellis was evaluated during consecutive summer and winter growing seasons for comparison different canopy management: a) branch thinning: comparison between one branch and two branches per spur and b) branch tipping: comparison between low and high upright trellis. The results obtained of the phytotechnical and physicochemical grape must characteristics allowed to confirm that there was no significant difference between rootstocks regarding branch thinning intensity and upright trellis height. The largest effect observed in canopy management was for yield values promoted by branch thinning. No effect was observed in the grape must physicochemical characteristics when the different treatments were compared in the same growing season. Regarding to the upright trellis height, larger values of soluble solids were obtained for the high trellis than in the low trellis. Winter growing season resulted in lower values of yield and greater values of total soluble solids and titratable acidity than in the summer growing season.
id UFV-5_c8d9507a7322a62784528a023dc1345b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-737X2018000600527
network_acronym_str UFV-5
network_name_str Revista Ceres
repository_id_str
spelling Yield and grape must quality of the IAC 138-22 ‘Máximo’ submitted to canopy managementsoluble solid contenttotal aciditywine grapeextemporaneous pruning.ABSTRACT Grape cultivar IAC 138-22 'Máximo' grafted on IAC 766 ‘Campinas’ and IAC 572 ‘Jales’ rootstocks and trained in upright trellis was evaluated during consecutive summer and winter growing seasons for comparison different canopy management: a) branch thinning: comparison between one branch and two branches per spur and b) branch tipping: comparison between low and high upright trellis. The results obtained of the phytotechnical and physicochemical grape must characteristics allowed to confirm that there was no significant difference between rootstocks regarding branch thinning intensity and upright trellis height. The largest effect observed in canopy management was for yield values promoted by branch thinning. No effect was observed in the grape must physicochemical characteristics when the different treatments were compared in the same growing season. Regarding to the upright trellis height, larger values of soluble solids were obtained for the high trellis than in the low trellis. Winter growing season resulted in lower values of yield and greater values of total soluble solids and titratable acidity than in the summer growing season.Universidade Federal de Viçosa2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2018000600527Revista Ceres v.65 n.6 2018reponame:Revista Ceresinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFV10.1590/0034-737x201865060008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHernandes,José LuizPedro Júnior,Mário Joséeng2019-01-21T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Yield and grape must quality of the IAC 138-22 ‘Máximo’ submitted to canopy management
title Yield and grape must quality of the IAC 138-22 ‘Máximo’ submitted to canopy management
spellingShingle Yield and grape must quality of the IAC 138-22 ‘Máximo’ submitted to canopy management
Hernandes,José Luiz
soluble solid content
total acidity
wine grape
extemporaneous pruning.
title_short Yield and grape must quality of the IAC 138-22 ‘Máximo’ submitted to canopy management
title_full Yield and grape must quality of the IAC 138-22 ‘Máximo’ submitted to canopy management
title_fullStr Yield and grape must quality of the IAC 138-22 ‘Máximo’ submitted to canopy management
title_full_unstemmed Yield and grape must quality of the IAC 138-22 ‘Máximo’ submitted to canopy management
title_sort Yield and grape must quality of the IAC 138-22 ‘Máximo’ submitted to canopy management
author Hernandes,José Luiz
author_facet Hernandes,José Luiz
Pedro Júnior,Mário José
author_role author
author2 Pedro Júnior,Mário José
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hernandes,José Luiz
Pedro Júnior,Mário José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv soluble solid content
total acidity
wine grape
extemporaneous pruning.
topic soluble solid content
total acidity
wine grape
extemporaneous pruning.
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv ABSTRACT Grape cultivar IAC 138-22 'Máximo' grafted on IAC 766 ‘Campinas’ and IAC 572 ‘Jales’ rootstocks and trained in upright trellis was evaluated during consecutive summer and winter growing seasons for comparison different canopy management: a) branch thinning: comparison between one branch and two branches per spur and b) branch tipping: comparison between low and high upright trellis. The results obtained of the phytotechnical and physicochemical grape must characteristics allowed to confirm that there was no significant difference between rootstocks regarding branch thinning intensity and upright trellis height. The largest effect observed in canopy management was for yield values promoted by branch thinning. No effect was observed in the grape must physicochemical characteristics when the different treatments were compared in the same growing season. Regarding to the upright trellis height, larger values of soluble solids were obtained for the high trellis than in the low trellis. Winter growing season resulted in lower values of yield and greater values of total soluble solids and titratable acidity than in the summer growing season.
description ABSTRACT Grape cultivar IAC 138-22 'Máximo' grafted on IAC 766 ‘Campinas’ and IAC 572 ‘Jales’ rootstocks and trained in upright trellis was evaluated during consecutive summer and winter growing seasons for comparison different canopy management: a) branch thinning: comparison between one branch and two branches per spur and b) branch tipping: comparison between low and high upright trellis. The results obtained of the phytotechnical and physicochemical grape must characteristics allowed to confirm that there was no significant difference between rootstocks regarding branch thinning intensity and upright trellis height. The largest effect observed in canopy management was for yield values promoted by branch thinning. No effect was observed in the grape must physicochemical characteristics when the different treatments were compared in the same growing season. Regarding to the upright trellis height, larger values of soluble solids were obtained for the high trellis than in the low trellis. Winter growing season resulted in lower values of yield and greater values of total soluble solids and titratable acidity than in the summer growing season.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2018000600527
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2018000600527
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0034-737x201865060008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ceres v.65 n.6 2018
reponame:Revista Ceres
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str Revista Ceres
collection Revista Ceres
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1728006783400673280