Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determination
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito |
DOI: | 10.32361/2020120210597 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/10597 |
Resumo: | The General Data Protection Law – LGPD (Law 13.709 /2018) emerges in a context of massive dissemination of data on the internet, with the so-called “datafication of things”. In this eternal vigilance, the data holder sees several of his fundamental rights violated. This means that there is a need for data protection laws that establish the data holder's participation in data processing. The LGPD gave visible importance to the requirement for consent and brought the idea that the consent of the holder would be a step towards the principle of informative self-determination. However, is it possible that consent alone ensures informational self-determination? What is the definition of this principle and to what extent does the LGPD ensure it? For this analysis, a dogmatic legal research will be carried out, based on data protection laws, comparisons with laws of other countries, studies of doctrines and material produced about the theme. |
id |
UFV-7_be55289112ecc7294e50bcea06c05bf2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/10597 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV-7 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito |
spelling |
Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determinationDa evolução das legislações sobre proteção de dados: a necessidade de reavaliação do papel do consentimento como garantidor da autodeterminação informativaInternetData processingThe General Data Protection LawInternetTratamento de dadosLei Geral de Proteção de DadosThe General Data Protection Law – LGPD (Law 13.709 /2018) emerges in a context of massive dissemination of data on the internet, with the so-called “datafication of things”. In this eternal vigilance, the data holder sees several of his fundamental rights violated. This means that there is a need for data protection laws that establish the data holder's participation in data processing. The LGPD gave visible importance to the requirement for consent and brought the idea that the consent of the holder would be a step towards the principle of informative self-determination. However, is it possible that consent alone ensures informational self-determination? What is the definition of this principle and to what extent does the LGPD ensure it? For this analysis, a dogmatic legal research will be carried out, based on data protection laws, comparisons with laws of other countries, studies of doctrines and material produced about the theme.A Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (Lei 13.709/2018) emerge em um contexto de disseminação massiva de dados na internet, com a chamada “datificação das coisas”. Em uma eterna vigilância, o titular de dados vê diversos de seus direitos fundamentais violados. Isso faz com que haja a necessidade de legislações de proteção de dados que consagrem a participação do titular no processamento de dados. A LGPD conferiu importância visível ao requisito do consentimento e trouxe a ideia de que o consentimento do titular seria um passo rumo ao princípio da autodeterminação informativa. Todavia, é possível que o consentimento por si só assegure a autodeterminação informativa? Qual é a definição desse princípio e em que medida a LGPD o assegura? Para essa análise, será feita uma pesquisa jurídico dogmática, baseando-se em legislações de proteção de dados, comparações com legislações de outros países, estudos de doutrinas e materiais produzidos sobre o tema.Universidade Federal de Viçosa2020-08-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1059710.32361/2020120210597Revista de Direito; Vol. 12 No. 02 (2020); 01-33Revista de Direito; Vol. 12 Núm. 02 (2020); 01-33Revista de Direito; v. 12 n. 02 (2020); 01-332527-03891806-8790reponame:Revista de Direitoinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVporhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/10597/5880Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLugati, Lys NunesAlmeida, Juliana Evangelista de2020-08-27T12:03:27Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/10597Revistahttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/oairevistadir@ufv.br2527-03891806-8790opendoar:2020-08-27T12:03:27Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determination Da evolução das legislações sobre proteção de dados: a necessidade de reavaliação do papel do consentimento como garantidor da autodeterminação informativa |
title |
Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determination |
spellingShingle |
Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determination Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determination Lugati, Lys Nunes Internet Data processing The General Data Protection Law Internet Tratamento de dados Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Lugati, Lys Nunes Internet Data processing The General Data Protection Law Internet Tratamento de dados Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados |
title_short |
Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determination |
title_full |
Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determination |
title_fullStr |
Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determination Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determination |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determination Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determination |
title_sort |
Evolution of data protection legislation: the need to reassess the role of consent as a guarantor of informational self-determination |
author |
Lugati, Lys Nunes |
author_facet |
Lugati, Lys Nunes Lugati, Lys Nunes Almeida, Juliana Evangelista de Almeida, Juliana Evangelista de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida, Juliana Evangelista de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lugati, Lys Nunes Almeida, Juliana Evangelista de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Internet Data processing The General Data Protection Law Internet Tratamento de dados Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados |
topic |
Internet Data processing The General Data Protection Law Internet Tratamento de dados Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados |
description |
The General Data Protection Law – LGPD (Law 13.709 /2018) emerges in a context of massive dissemination of data on the internet, with the so-called “datafication of things”. In this eternal vigilance, the data holder sees several of his fundamental rights violated. This means that there is a need for data protection laws that establish the data holder's participation in data processing. The LGPD gave visible importance to the requirement for consent and brought the idea that the consent of the holder would be a step towards the principle of informative self-determination. However, is it possible that consent alone ensures informational self-determination? What is the definition of this principle and to what extent does the LGPD ensure it? For this analysis, a dogmatic legal research will be carried out, based on data protection laws, comparisons with laws of other countries, studies of doctrines and material produced about the theme. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/10597 10.32361/2020120210597 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/10597 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.32361/2020120210597 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/10597/5880 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Direito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Direito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito; Vol. 12 No. 02 (2020); 01-33 Revista de Direito; Vol. 12 Núm. 02 (2020); 01-33 Revista de Direito; v. 12 n. 02 (2020); 01-33 2527-0389 1806-8790 reponame:Revista de Direito instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito |
collection |
Revista de Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadir@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1822180695605248000 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.32361/2020120210597 |