(Non)applicability of the rules of the Rome Statute in Brazil: a review on the leading cases of Brazilian Supreme Courts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Xavier, Fernando César Costa
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Souza, Líbia Renata Oliveira de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/12728
Resumo: This article aims to analyze the applicability of the Rome Statute rules to Brazil, in accordance with the constitutional principles of legal reservation (Art. 5, II and XXXIX, of Brazilian Constitution) and the non-retroactivity of criminal law (Art. 5, XL, of Brazilian Constitution). Considering as main object the Special Appeal 1.798.903/RJ judgement, in which the leading cases of the Brazilian Supreme Court were raised, this article aims to answer the following questions: can we consider the rules in Articles 7 and 29 of the Rome Statute applicable in Brazil? Is this country violating Articles 86 and 88 of the Rome Statute? The content is divided into three parts, in which, respectively, the evolution of jurisprudence on the subject is described; then, the doctrinal vision concerned is exposed; and, finally, a tertium quid position is supported.
id UFV-7_e4656f4e582aa1c3dab8d6d199641447
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/12728
network_acronym_str UFV-7
network_name_str Revista de Direito
repository_id_str
spelling (Non)applicability of the rules of the Rome Statute in Brazil: a review on the leading cases of Brazilian Supreme CourtsA (in)aplicabilidade das normas do Estatuto de Roma no Brasil: uma revisão acerca dos precedentes dos tribunais superioresRome StatuteLegal reservation principleNon-retroactivity of the criminal law principleRecurso Especial No. 1.798.903/RJBrazilEstatuto de RomaPrincípio da reserva legal.Princípio da irretroatividade da lei penalBrasilRecurso Especial nº 1.798.903/RJThis article aims to analyze the applicability of the Rome Statute rules to Brazil, in accordance with the constitutional principles of legal reservation (Art. 5, II and XXXIX, of Brazilian Constitution) and the non-retroactivity of criminal law (Art. 5, XL, of Brazilian Constitution). Considering as main object the Special Appeal 1.798.903/RJ judgement, in which the leading cases of the Brazilian Supreme Court were raised, this article aims to answer the following questions: can we consider the rules in Articles 7 and 29 of the Rome Statute applicable in Brazil? Is this country violating Articles 86 and 88 of the Rome Statute? The content is divided into three parts, in which, respectively, the evolution of jurisprudence on the subject is described; then, the doctrinal vision concerned is exposed; and, finally, a tertium quid position is supported.O artigo tem como objetivo analisar a aplicabilidade das normas do Estatuto de Roma no Brasil, em face dos princípios constitucionais da reserva legal (art. 5º, II e XXXIX) e da irretroatividade da lei penal (art. 5º, XL). Tendo como objeto principal o julgamento do Recurso Especial nº 1.798.903/RJ, no qual os precedentes do Supremo Tribunal Federal foram suscitados, busca-se resposta aos seguintes questionamentos: seria possível considerar que as normas previstas nos artigos 7º e 29 do Estatuto de Roma são aplicáveis no Brasil? O país está violando os artigos 86 e 88 do Estatuto de Roma? O texto está dividido em três partes, nas quais, respectivamente, descreve-se a evolução jurisprudencial sobre o tema, conforme os argumentos levantados no Recurso Especial nº 1.798.903/RJ; em seguida, expõe-se a visão doutrinária concernente; e, por fim, sustenta-se uma posição tertium quid.Universidade Federal de Viçosa2021-12-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1272810.32361/2021130312728Revista de Direito; Vol. 13 No. 03 (2021); 01-21Revista de Direito; Vol. 13 Núm. 03 (2021); 01-21Revista de Direito; v. 13 n. 03 (2021); 01-212527-03891806-8790reponame:Revista de Direitoinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVporhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/12728/7025Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessXavier, Fernando César CostaSouza, Líbia Renata Oliveira de2021-12-08T17:58:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/12728Revistahttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/oairevistadir@ufv.br2527-03891806-8790opendoar:2021-12-08T17:58:06Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv (Non)applicability of the rules of the Rome Statute in Brazil: a review on the leading cases of Brazilian Supreme Courts
A (in)aplicabilidade das normas do Estatuto de Roma no Brasil: uma revisão acerca dos precedentes dos tribunais superiores
title (Non)applicability of the rules of the Rome Statute in Brazil: a review on the leading cases of Brazilian Supreme Courts
spellingShingle (Non)applicability of the rules of the Rome Statute in Brazil: a review on the leading cases of Brazilian Supreme Courts
Xavier, Fernando César Costa
Rome Statute
Legal reservation principle
Non-retroactivity of the criminal law principle
Recurso Especial No. 1.798.903/RJ
Brazil
Estatuto de Roma
Princípio da reserva legal.
Princípio da irretroatividade da lei penal
Brasil
Recurso Especial nº 1.798.903/RJ
title_short (Non)applicability of the rules of the Rome Statute in Brazil: a review on the leading cases of Brazilian Supreme Courts
title_full (Non)applicability of the rules of the Rome Statute in Brazil: a review on the leading cases of Brazilian Supreme Courts
title_fullStr (Non)applicability of the rules of the Rome Statute in Brazil: a review on the leading cases of Brazilian Supreme Courts
title_full_unstemmed (Non)applicability of the rules of the Rome Statute in Brazil: a review on the leading cases of Brazilian Supreme Courts
title_sort (Non)applicability of the rules of the Rome Statute in Brazil: a review on the leading cases of Brazilian Supreme Courts
author Xavier, Fernando César Costa
author_facet Xavier, Fernando César Costa
Souza, Líbia Renata Oliveira de
author_role author
author2 Souza, Líbia Renata Oliveira de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Xavier, Fernando César Costa
Souza, Líbia Renata Oliveira de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Rome Statute
Legal reservation principle
Non-retroactivity of the criminal law principle
Recurso Especial No. 1.798.903/RJ
Brazil
Estatuto de Roma
Princípio da reserva legal.
Princípio da irretroatividade da lei penal
Brasil
Recurso Especial nº 1.798.903/RJ
topic Rome Statute
Legal reservation principle
Non-retroactivity of the criminal law principle
Recurso Especial No. 1.798.903/RJ
Brazil
Estatuto de Roma
Princípio da reserva legal.
Princípio da irretroatividade da lei penal
Brasil
Recurso Especial nº 1.798.903/RJ
description This article aims to analyze the applicability of the Rome Statute rules to Brazil, in accordance with the constitutional principles of legal reservation (Art. 5, II and XXXIX, of Brazilian Constitution) and the non-retroactivity of criminal law (Art. 5, XL, of Brazilian Constitution). Considering as main object the Special Appeal 1.798.903/RJ judgement, in which the leading cases of the Brazilian Supreme Court were raised, this article aims to answer the following questions: can we consider the rules in Articles 7 and 29 of the Rome Statute applicable in Brazil? Is this country violating Articles 86 and 88 of the Rome Statute? The content is divided into three parts, in which, respectively, the evolution of jurisprudence on the subject is described; then, the doctrinal vision concerned is exposed; and, finally, a tertium quid position is supported.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/12728
10.32361/2021130312728
url https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/12728
identifier_str_mv 10.32361/2021130312728
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/12728/7025
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito; Vol. 13 No. 03 (2021); 01-21
Revista de Direito; Vol. 13 Núm. 03 (2021); 01-21
Revista de Direito; v. 13 n. 03 (2021); 01-21
2527-0389
1806-8790
reponame:Revista de Direito
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str Revista de Direito
collection Revista de Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadir@ufv.br
_version_ 1809279554366210048

Registros relacionados