THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1983 |
Resumo: | Bill No. 4.148/08 intends to eliminate the requirement for the “T” symbol in the packaging of products containing more than one percent of GMOs in its composition, due to the alleged negative charge that it presents, going against what is advocated by the Biosafety Law, the Consumer Defense Code, as well as the Federal Constitution. Thus, the objective is to analyze the consequences to consumers, in case the bill is eventually sanctioned, as well as if there is an affront to the fundamental precepts listed in the Magna Carta and other legal diplomas, through the inductive method of research supported by the bibliographic collection available. It was concluded that, in addition to confronting the provisions of the Consumer Defense Code, there is also a violation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, as well as the material unconstitutionality of Bill No. 4.148/08, resulting from the affront to articles 5, XIV and XXXII, and 170, V of the Constitution. |
id |
UFV-7_e9bc892978d5c197e9e2cb6ed1ae54ec |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/1983 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV-7 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988O fim da rotulagem dos alimentos transgênicos e o direito à informação consagrado pelo Código de Proteção e Defesa do Consumidor à luz da Constituição Federal de 1988Transgenic. Bill nº 4.148/08. Consumer Defense Code. Federal Constitution.Transgênicos. Projeto de Lei nº 4.148/08. Código do Consumidor. Constituição Federal.Bill No. 4.148/08 intends to eliminate the requirement for the “T” symbol in the packaging of products containing more than one percent of GMOs in its composition, due to the alleged negative charge that it presents, going against what is advocated by the Biosafety Law, the Consumer Defense Code, as well as the Federal Constitution. Thus, the objective is to analyze the consequences to consumers, in case the bill is eventually sanctioned, as well as if there is an affront to the fundamental precepts listed in the Magna Carta and other legal diplomas, through the inductive method of research supported by the bibliographic collection available. It was concluded that, in addition to confronting the provisions of the Consumer Defense Code, there is also a violation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, as well as the material unconstitutionality of Bill No. 4.148/08, resulting from the affront to articles 5, XIV and XXXII, and 170, V of the Constitution.O Projeto de Lei nº 4.148/08 pretende acabar com a exigência do símbolo “T” na embalagem de produtos que contenham mais de um por cento de transgênicos na sua composição, em razão da suposta carga negativa que este apresenta, indo de encontro com o que preconiza a Lei de Biossegurança, o Código de Defesa do Consumidor, bem como a Constituição Federal. Assim, objetiva-se analisar as consequências acarretadas aos consumidores caso o projeto seja sancionado, bem como a afronta a preceitos fundamentais elencados na Carta Magna e demais dispositivos legais, por meio do método indutivo de pesquisa, com apoio no acervo bibliográfico disponível. Concluiu-se que, além de afrontar o que preconiza o Código de Defesa do Consumidor, há também violação ao Protocolo de Cartagena sobre a Biossegurança e, ainda, inconstitucionalidade material do Projeto de Lei nº 4.148/08, decorrente da afronta aos artigos 5º, XIV e XXXII e 170, V da Constituição.Universidade Federal de Viçosa2018-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1983Revista de Direito; Vol. 9 No. 02 (2017); 119-160Revista de Direito; Vol. 9 Núm. 02 (2017); 119-160Revista de Direito; v. 9 n. 02 (2017); 119-1602527-03891806-8790reponame:Revista de Direitoinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVporhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1983/pdfBarbosa, Ingrid LimaSilva, Daniel Monteiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-01-30T18:04:24Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/1983Revistahttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/oairevistadir@ufv.br2527-03891806-8790opendoar:2019-01-30T18:04:24Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988 O fim da rotulagem dos alimentos transgênicos e o direito à informação consagrado pelo Código de Proteção e Defesa do Consumidor à luz da Constituição Federal de 1988 |
title |
THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988 |
spellingShingle |
THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988 Barbosa, Ingrid Lima Transgenic. Bill nº 4.148/08. Consumer Defense Code. Federal Constitution. Transgênicos. Projeto de Lei nº 4.148/08. Código do Consumidor. Constituição Federal. |
title_short |
THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988 |
title_full |
THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988 |
title_fullStr |
THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988 |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988 |
title_sort |
THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988 |
author |
Barbosa, Ingrid Lima |
author_facet |
Barbosa, Ingrid Lima Silva, Daniel Monteiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Daniel Monteiro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barbosa, Ingrid Lima Silva, Daniel Monteiro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Transgenic. Bill nº 4.148/08. Consumer Defense Code. Federal Constitution. Transgênicos. Projeto de Lei nº 4.148/08. Código do Consumidor. Constituição Federal. |
topic |
Transgenic. Bill nº 4.148/08. Consumer Defense Code. Federal Constitution. Transgênicos. Projeto de Lei nº 4.148/08. Código do Consumidor. Constituição Federal. |
description |
Bill No. 4.148/08 intends to eliminate the requirement for the “T” symbol in the packaging of products containing more than one percent of GMOs in its composition, due to the alleged negative charge that it presents, going against what is advocated by the Biosafety Law, the Consumer Defense Code, as well as the Federal Constitution. Thus, the objective is to analyze the consequences to consumers, in case the bill is eventually sanctioned, as well as if there is an affront to the fundamental precepts listed in the Magna Carta and other legal diplomas, through the inductive method of research supported by the bibliographic collection available. It was concluded that, in addition to confronting the provisions of the Consumer Defense Code, there is also a violation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, as well as the material unconstitutionality of Bill No. 4.148/08, resulting from the affront to articles 5, XIV and XXXII, and 170, V of the Constitution. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1983 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1983 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1983/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito; Vol. 9 No. 02 (2017); 119-160 Revista de Direito; Vol. 9 Núm. 02 (2017); 119-160 Revista de Direito; v. 9 n. 02 (2017); 119-160 2527-0389 1806-8790 reponame:Revista de Direito instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito |
collection |
Revista de Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadir@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1809279553443463168 |