What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Espinhaço |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/96 |
Resumo: | Geographic Education in the United States generally receives less attention than many other subjects, and surveys have found that most students lack proficiency. The resulting level of geographic literacy in the general population carries significant implications for national and international competitiveness and decision-making. This paper reviews factors leading to deficiencies in US Geography Education, including lack of emphasis compared with subjects more prominently tested, teacher preparation and in-service training, curricula design, and high student mobility rates. We also review positive trends, including developing more rigorous sets of learning standards and geographic skills, and support from interested organizations and State educational agencies for encouraging student interest and participation in assessments and contests. We examine selective resources for teaching and learning geographic concepts and skills, many available online from federal and nongovernmental agencies. Finally, we consider the potential for learning geography through such informal science education venues as museums and mass media. |
id |
UFVJM-1_1d6bad55f0447e658c4b6e41e6a8efd1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/96 |
network_acronym_str |
UFVJM-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Espinhaço |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?O que está errado e o que está certo com o ensino de Geografia nos EUA?educação geográficaEstados Unidosletramento geográficodeficiênciastendências positivasgeography educationUnited Statesgeographic literacydeficienciespositive trendsGeographic Education in the United States generally receives less attention than many other subjects, and surveys have found that most students lack proficiency. The resulting level of geographic literacy in the general population carries significant implications for national and international competitiveness and decision-making. This paper reviews factors leading to deficiencies in US Geography Education, including lack of emphasis compared with subjects more prominently tested, teacher preparation and in-service training, curricula design, and high student mobility rates. We also review positive trends, including developing more rigorous sets of learning standards and geographic skills, and support from interested organizations and State educational agencies for encouraging student interest and participation in assessments and contests. We examine selective resources for teaching and learning geographic concepts and skills, many available online from federal and nongovernmental agencies. Finally, we consider the potential for learning geography through such informal science education venues as museums and mass media.Geographic Education in the United States generally receives less attention than many other subjects, and surveys have found that most students lack proficiency. The resulting level of geographic literacy in the general population carries significant implications for national and international competitiveness and decision-making. This paper reviews factors leading to deficiencies in US Geography Education, including lack of emphasis compared with subjects more prominently tested, teacher preparation and in-service training, curricula design, and high student mobility rates. We also review positive trends, including developing more rigorous sets of learning standards and geographic skills, and support from interested organizations and State educational agencies for encouraging student interest and participation in assessments and contests. We examine selective resources for teaching and learning geographic concepts and skills, many available online from federal and nongovernmental agencies. Finally, we consider the potential for learning geography through such informal science education venues as museums and mass media.UFVJM2017-06-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/9610.5281/zenodo.3956640Revista Espinhaço ; Revista Espinhaço #102317-0611reponame:Revista Espinhaçoinstname:Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)instacron:UFVJMenghttps://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/96/105Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJ. Passow, Michael2022-07-22T18:46:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/96Revistahttps://revistaespinhaco.com/index.php/revista/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/oairevista.espinhaco@gmail.com || doug.sathler@gmail.com2317-06112317-0611opendoar:2022-07-22T18:46:10Revista Espinhaço - Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? O que está errado e o que está certo com o ensino de Geografia nos EUA? |
title |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? |
spellingShingle |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? J. Passow, Michael educação geográfica Estados Unidos letramento geográfico deficiências tendências positivas geography education United States geographic literacy deficiencies positive trends |
title_short |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? |
title_full |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? |
title_fullStr |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? |
title_sort |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? |
author |
J. Passow, Michael |
author_facet |
J. Passow, Michael |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
J. Passow, Michael |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
educação geográfica Estados Unidos letramento geográfico deficiências tendências positivas geography education United States geographic literacy deficiencies positive trends |
topic |
educação geográfica Estados Unidos letramento geográfico deficiências tendências positivas geography education United States geographic literacy deficiencies positive trends |
description |
Geographic Education in the United States generally receives less attention than many other subjects, and surveys have found that most students lack proficiency. The resulting level of geographic literacy in the general population carries significant implications for national and international competitiveness and decision-making. This paper reviews factors leading to deficiencies in US Geography Education, including lack of emphasis compared with subjects more prominently tested, teacher preparation and in-service training, curricula design, and high student mobility rates. We also review positive trends, including developing more rigorous sets of learning standards and geographic skills, and support from interested organizations and State educational agencies for encouraging student interest and participation in assessments and contests. We examine selective resources for teaching and learning geographic concepts and skills, many available online from federal and nongovernmental agencies. Finally, we consider the potential for learning geography through such informal science education venues as museums and mass media. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/96 10.5281/zenodo.3956640 |
url |
https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/96 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5281/zenodo.3956640 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/96/105 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFVJM |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFVJM |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Espinhaço ; Revista Espinhaço #10 2317-0611 reponame:Revista Espinhaço instname:Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) instacron:UFVJM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) |
instacron_str |
UFVJM |
institution |
UFVJM |
reponame_str |
Revista Espinhaço |
collection |
Revista Espinhaço |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Espinhaço - Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.espinhaco@gmail.com || doug.sathler@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798325375030263808 |