What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: J. Passow, Michael
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Espinhaço
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/96
Resumo: Geographic Education in the United States generally receives less attention than many other subjects, and surveys have found that most students lack proficiency. The resulting level of geographic literacy in the general population carries significant implications for national and international competitiveness and decision-making. This paper reviews factors leading to deficiencies in US Geography Education, including lack of emphasis compared with subjects more prominently tested, teacher preparation and in-service training, curricula design, and high student mobility rates. We also review positive trends, including developing more rigorous sets of learning standards and geographic skills, and support from interested organizations and State educational agencies for encouraging student interest and participation in assessments and contests. We examine selective resources for teaching and learning geographic concepts and skills, many available online from federal and nongovernmental agencies. Finally, we consider the potential for learning geography through such informal science education venues as museums and mass media.
id UFVJM-1_1d6bad55f0447e658c4b6e41e6a8efd1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/96
network_acronym_str UFVJM-1
network_name_str Revista Espinhaço
repository_id_str
spelling What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?O que está errado e o que está certo com o ensino de Geografia nos EUA?educação geográficaEstados Unidosletramento geográficodeficiênciastendências positivasgeography educationUnited Statesgeographic literacydeficienciespositive trendsGeographic Education in the United States generally receives less attention than many other subjects, and surveys have found that most students lack proficiency. The resulting level of geographic literacy in the general population carries significant implications for national and international competitiveness and decision-making. This paper reviews factors leading to deficiencies in US Geography Education, including lack of emphasis compared with subjects more prominently tested, teacher preparation and in-service training, curricula design, and high student mobility rates. We also review positive trends, including developing more rigorous sets of learning standards and geographic skills, and support from interested organizations and State educational agencies for encouraging student interest and participation in assessments and contests. We examine selective resources for teaching and learning geographic concepts and skills, many available online from federal and nongovernmental agencies. Finally, we consider the potential for learning geography through such informal science education venues as museums and mass media.Geographic Education in the United States generally receives less attention than many other subjects, and surveys have found that most students lack proficiency. The resulting level of geographic literacy in the general population carries significant implications for national and international competitiveness and decision-making. This paper reviews factors leading to deficiencies in US Geography Education, including lack of emphasis compared with subjects more prominently tested, teacher preparation and in-service training, curricula design, and high student mobility rates. We also review positive trends, including developing more rigorous sets of learning standards and geographic skills, and support from interested organizations and State educational agencies for encouraging student interest and participation in assessments and contests. We examine selective resources for teaching and learning geographic concepts and skills, many available online from federal and nongovernmental agencies. Finally, we consider the potential for learning geography through such informal science education venues as museums and mass media.UFVJM2017-06-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/9610.5281/zenodo.3956640Revista Espinhaço ; Revista Espinhaço #102317-0611reponame:Revista Espinhaçoinstname:Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)instacron:UFVJMenghttps://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/96/105Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJ. Passow, Michael2022-07-22T18:46:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/96Revistahttps://revistaespinhaco.com/index.php/revista/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/oairevista.espinhaco@gmail.com || doug.sathler@gmail.com2317-06112317-0611opendoar:2022-07-22T18:46:10Revista Espinhaço - Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?
O que está errado e o que está certo com o ensino de Geografia nos EUA?
title What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?
spellingShingle What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?
J. Passow, Michael
educação geográfica
Estados Unidos
letramento geográfico
deficiências
tendências positivas
geography education
United States
geographic literacy
deficiencies
positive trends
title_short What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?
title_full What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?
title_fullStr What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?
title_full_unstemmed What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?
title_sort What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?
author J. Passow, Michael
author_facet J. Passow, Michael
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv J. Passow, Michael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv educação geográfica
Estados Unidos
letramento geográfico
deficiências
tendências positivas
geography education
United States
geographic literacy
deficiencies
positive trends
topic educação geográfica
Estados Unidos
letramento geográfico
deficiências
tendências positivas
geography education
United States
geographic literacy
deficiencies
positive trends
description Geographic Education in the United States generally receives less attention than many other subjects, and surveys have found that most students lack proficiency. The resulting level of geographic literacy in the general population carries significant implications for national and international competitiveness and decision-making. This paper reviews factors leading to deficiencies in US Geography Education, including lack of emphasis compared with subjects more prominently tested, teacher preparation and in-service training, curricula design, and high student mobility rates. We also review positive trends, including developing more rigorous sets of learning standards and geographic skills, and support from interested organizations and State educational agencies for encouraging student interest and participation in assessments and contests. We examine selective resources for teaching and learning geographic concepts and skills, many available online from federal and nongovernmental agencies. Finally, we consider the potential for learning geography through such informal science education venues as museums and mass media.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/96
10.5281/zenodo.3956640
url https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/96
identifier_str_mv 10.5281/zenodo.3956640
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufvjm.edu.br/revista-espinhaco/article/view/96/105
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFVJM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFVJM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Espinhaço ; Revista Espinhaço #10
2317-0611
reponame:Revista Espinhaço
instname:Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)
instacron:UFVJM
instname_str Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)
instacron_str UFVJM
institution UFVJM
reponame_str Revista Espinhaço
collection Revista Espinhaço
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Espinhaço - Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.espinhaco@gmail.com || doug.sathler@gmail.com
_version_ 1798325375030263808