Effects of rumen undegradable protein on intake, digestibility and rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics of dairy heifers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Alex L.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Detmann, Edenio, Rennó, Luciana N., Pedroso, Alexandre M., Fontes, Marta M. S., Morais, Valber C., Sguizzato, Anna L. L., Abreu, Marcelo B., Rotta, Polyana P., Marcondes, Marcos I.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.07.019
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23828
Resumo: The aim of this work was to evaluate the influence of increasing amounts of rumen undegradable protein (RUP) on intake, nutrient digestibility, rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics and N use efficiency of dairy Holstein heifers. Eight rumen-cannulated Holstein heifers (initial body weight 276 ± 8.3 kg) were used in a replicate 4 × 4 Latin square design with four dietary RUP amounts in the total dietary protein, as follows: 38% of RUP (38RUP), 44% of RUP (44RUP), 51% of RUP (51RUP) and 57% of RUP (57RUP). The experimental period was 84 days, subdivided into four periods of 21 days (14 days for adaptation + 7 days for collections). Eight spot collections of faeces, urine, ruminal content and omasal digesta were performed at 9-h intervals, as follows: on 15th day samples were collected at 0600 h and 1500 h; on 16th day samples were collected at 0000 h, 0900 h and 1800 h; on 17th day samples were collected at 0300 h, 1200 h and 2100 h. Two complete rumen evacuations were performed: one on 19th day 4 h after morning feeding and another on 21st day immediately before morning feeding. Total (kg/day) and relative (g/kg of body weight) intake of dry matter, crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fibre corrected for ash and protein were not affected (P >  0.10) by dietary RUP amounts. Ruminal (P =  0.06) and intestinal (P =  0.09) digestibilities of CP presented a tendency to decrease with increasing RUP. There were no effects of dietary RUP amounts (P >  0.10) on the rates of ingestion, passage and digestion (%/h) as well on the total volatile fatty acid concentration in the rumen. Urinary N excretion presented a tendency (P =  0.08) to decrease with increasing RUP. In addition, retained N presented a tendency (P =  0.09) to increase according to dietary RUP amounts and greater values were observed for treatments 51RUP and 57RUP. Microbial protein synthesis, microbial efficiency and the efficiency of use of N for microbial synthesis decreased with increasing RUP (P <  0.05). Metabolisable protein flow presented a tendency to increase (P =  0.091) and greater values were observed for 51RUP and 57RUP. In general, urinary N excretion decreased, while the flow of metabolisable protein and RUP increased with increasing RUP levels. As a consequence of this pattern, the treatments 51RUP and 57RUP presented increases in the retained N.
id UFV_7dd471c2fd768ed35f585f47e0e41720
oai_identifier_str oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/23828
network_acronym_str UFV
network_name_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
repository_id_str 2145
spelling Silva, Alex L.Detmann, EdenioRennó, Luciana N.Pedroso, Alexandre M.Fontes, Marta M. S.Morais, Valber C.Sguizzato, Anna L. L.Abreu, Marcelo B.Rotta, Polyana P.Marcondes, Marcos I.2019-03-07T18:44:44Z2019-03-07T18:44:44Z2018-100377-8401https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.07.019http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23828The aim of this work was to evaluate the influence of increasing amounts of rumen undegradable protein (RUP) on intake, nutrient digestibility, rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics and N use efficiency of dairy Holstein heifers. Eight rumen-cannulated Holstein heifers (initial body weight 276 ± 8.3 kg) were used in a replicate 4 × 4 Latin square design with four dietary RUP amounts in the total dietary protein, as follows: 38% of RUP (38RUP), 44% of RUP (44RUP), 51% of RUP (51RUP) and 57% of RUP (57RUP). The experimental period was 84 days, subdivided into four periods of 21 days (14 days for adaptation + 7 days for collections). Eight spot collections of faeces, urine, ruminal content and omasal digesta were performed at 9-h intervals, as follows: on 15th day samples were collected at 0600 h and 1500 h; on 16th day samples were collected at 0000 h, 0900 h and 1800 h; on 17th day samples were collected at 0300 h, 1200 h and 2100 h. Two complete rumen evacuations were performed: one on 19th day 4 h after morning feeding and another on 21st day immediately before morning feeding. Total (kg/day) and relative (g/kg of body weight) intake of dry matter, crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fibre corrected for ash and protein were not affected (P >  0.10) by dietary RUP amounts. Ruminal (P =  0.06) and intestinal (P =  0.09) digestibilities of CP presented a tendency to decrease with increasing RUP. There were no effects of dietary RUP amounts (P >  0.10) on the rates of ingestion, passage and digestion (%/h) as well on the total volatile fatty acid concentration in the rumen. Urinary N excretion presented a tendency (P =  0.08) to decrease with increasing RUP. In addition, retained N presented a tendency (P =  0.09) to increase according to dietary RUP amounts and greater values were observed for treatments 51RUP and 57RUP. Microbial protein synthesis, microbial efficiency and the efficiency of use of N for microbial synthesis decreased with increasing RUP (P <  0.05). Metabolisable protein flow presented a tendency to increase (P =  0.091) and greater values were observed for 51RUP and 57RUP. In general, urinary N excretion decreased, while the flow of metabolisable protein and RUP increased with increasing RUP levels. As a consequence of this pattern, the treatments 51RUP and 57RUP presented increases in the retained N.engAnimal Feed Science and TechnologyVolume 244, Pages 1-10, October 2018Elsevier B. V.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMicrobial proteinNitrogen balanceRDPRUPEffects of rumen undegradable protein on intake, digestibility and rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics of dairy heifersinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVORIGINALartigo.pdfartigo.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf339722https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23828/1/artigo.pdf72c7abf24f9546798bc022ee90f62473MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23828/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52123456789/238282019-03-07 15:45:13.824oai:locus.ufv.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452019-03-07T18:45:13LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Effects of rumen undegradable protein on intake, digestibility and rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics of dairy heifers
title Effects of rumen undegradable protein on intake, digestibility and rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics of dairy heifers
spellingShingle Effects of rumen undegradable protein on intake, digestibility and rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics of dairy heifers
Silva, Alex L.
Microbial protein
Nitrogen balance
RDP
RUP
title_short Effects of rumen undegradable protein on intake, digestibility and rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics of dairy heifers
title_full Effects of rumen undegradable protein on intake, digestibility and rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics of dairy heifers
title_fullStr Effects of rumen undegradable protein on intake, digestibility and rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics of dairy heifers
title_full_unstemmed Effects of rumen undegradable protein on intake, digestibility and rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics of dairy heifers
title_sort Effects of rumen undegradable protein on intake, digestibility and rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics of dairy heifers
author Silva, Alex L.
author_facet Silva, Alex L.
Detmann, Edenio
Rennó, Luciana N.
Pedroso, Alexandre M.
Fontes, Marta M. S.
Morais, Valber C.
Sguizzato, Anna L. L.
Abreu, Marcelo B.
Rotta, Polyana P.
Marcondes, Marcos I.
author_role author
author2 Detmann, Edenio
Rennó, Luciana N.
Pedroso, Alexandre M.
Fontes, Marta M. S.
Morais, Valber C.
Sguizzato, Anna L. L.
Abreu, Marcelo B.
Rotta, Polyana P.
Marcondes, Marcos I.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Alex L.
Detmann, Edenio
Rennó, Luciana N.
Pedroso, Alexandre M.
Fontes, Marta M. S.
Morais, Valber C.
Sguizzato, Anna L. L.
Abreu, Marcelo B.
Rotta, Polyana P.
Marcondes, Marcos I.
dc.subject.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Microbial protein
Nitrogen balance
RDP
RUP
topic Microbial protein
Nitrogen balance
RDP
RUP
description The aim of this work was to evaluate the influence of increasing amounts of rumen undegradable protein (RUP) on intake, nutrient digestibility, rumen kinetics and fermentation characteristics and N use efficiency of dairy Holstein heifers. Eight rumen-cannulated Holstein heifers (initial body weight 276 ± 8.3 kg) were used in a replicate 4 × 4 Latin square design with four dietary RUP amounts in the total dietary protein, as follows: 38% of RUP (38RUP), 44% of RUP (44RUP), 51% of RUP (51RUP) and 57% of RUP (57RUP). The experimental period was 84 days, subdivided into four periods of 21 days (14 days for adaptation + 7 days for collections). Eight spot collections of faeces, urine, ruminal content and omasal digesta were performed at 9-h intervals, as follows: on 15th day samples were collected at 0600 h and 1500 h; on 16th day samples were collected at 0000 h, 0900 h and 1800 h; on 17th day samples were collected at 0300 h, 1200 h and 2100 h. Two complete rumen evacuations were performed: one on 19th day 4 h after morning feeding and another on 21st day immediately before morning feeding. Total (kg/day) and relative (g/kg of body weight) intake of dry matter, crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fibre corrected for ash and protein were not affected (P >  0.10) by dietary RUP amounts. Ruminal (P =  0.06) and intestinal (P =  0.09) digestibilities of CP presented a tendency to decrease with increasing RUP. There were no effects of dietary RUP amounts (P >  0.10) on the rates of ingestion, passage and digestion (%/h) as well on the total volatile fatty acid concentration in the rumen. Urinary N excretion presented a tendency (P =  0.08) to decrease with increasing RUP. In addition, retained N presented a tendency (P =  0.09) to increase according to dietary RUP amounts and greater values were observed for treatments 51RUP and 57RUP. Microbial protein synthesis, microbial efficiency and the efficiency of use of N for microbial synthesis decreased with increasing RUP (P <  0.05). Metabolisable protein flow presented a tendency to increase (P =  0.091) and greater values were observed for 51RUP and 57RUP. In general, urinary N excretion decreased, while the flow of metabolisable protein and RUP increased with increasing RUP levels. As a consequence of this pattern, the treatments 51RUP and 57RUP presented increases in the retained N.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-10
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-03-07T18:44:44Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-03-07T18:44:44Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.07.019
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23828
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0377-8401
identifier_str_mv 0377-8401
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.07.019
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23828
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Volume 244, Pages 1-10, October 2018
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Elsevier B. V.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Elsevier B. V.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Animal Feed Science and Technology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Animal Feed Science and Technology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
collection LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23828/1/artigo.pdf
https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23828/2/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 72c7abf24f9546798bc022ee90f62473
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fabiojreis@ufv.br
_version_ 1801213020081225728