Teores de nitrogênio uréico no leite e plasma de vacas mestiças

• Autor(a) principal: Magalhães, Amélia Cristina Mendes de
• Data de Publicação: 2003
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
• Texto Completo: http://locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/5164
• topic: Nitrogênio uréico; Uréia; Leite; Urea nitrogen; Urea; Milk; CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA::CLINICA E CIRURGIA ANIMAL

The objective of this study was to validate the use of results of commercial enzymatic kits (KITS UREA CE), also to milk. Samples (n = 35) were collected and each one was divided into five aliquots. Two of which were sent to reference laboratories (LRs) and the others were analysed by means of KITS UREA CE. Before the analysis, however, each of these was submitted to different procedures: centrifugation at 2300 x g during 30 min (CENT), precipitation with glacial acetic acid associated to the centrifugation (ACET) or precipitation with 25% tricloro acetic acid followed by filtration (TCA). MUN values differed between laboratories (P > 0.05), but were highly correlated (r=0.95) with each other. MUN values from TCA, ACET and CENT were highly correlated among each other and the LRs but only the samples submitted to TCA procedure presented equal results (p < 0.05) to the one of the LR. Hence, the TCA technique was used in the subsequent step of this study, in which 10 farms located in the surroundings of Viçosa-MG were utilized. For each farm it was reserved one day to collect the milk samples during the morning milking (only healthy cows with less than 30 days after calving). Following, blood samples of dry and healthy cows, with expected calving greater than 20 days, were collected. As soon as the morning milking finished, one sample of milk bulk was collected in each property and the information about the groups of lactation or dries cows (food, number of cows and milk production) were recorded. In only one of the farms samples from lactation cows (n = 35) were also collected immediately after the morning milking. The results showed that only six of the 33 groups of cows obtained MUN average values between 12 and 16 mg/dL and three others showed MUN greater than 16 mg/dL. Despite of this, in six farms all groups of cows (n=15) presented MUN average values much lower than 12 mg/dL and in the others farms eight groups showed similar values. When the 33 groups of cows were arranged in four categories according to milk production (A: ³ 25Kg; B: 20-25Kg; C: 15-20Kg and D:£ 15Kg) the MUN average values calculated for each one of them and the respective intervals were 17.35 ± 3,79, 8.28 ± 4.18, 7.29 ± 4.29 and 6.25 ± 3.65 mg/dL. It was also observed that in seven farms where the MUN values of the samples of bulk milk were lower than 12mg/dL 95,2% (20/21) of the productions groups presented similar behavior in relation to MUN average values. Three other farms showed MUN values in bulk milk samples higher than 16mg/dL and had at least one feeding group with MUN average elevated. From ten farms, only one presented PUN average values in dry cows superior to 16 mg/dL and other eight presented values lower than 12 mg/dL. This study concludes then that ,in crossbreeding milking herds, only groups of cows with daily milk production greater than 20 mg/dL require attention in relation to excess of protein the diet and its effects. The majority of lactating and dries cows groups showed respectively MUN and PUN values very low demonstrating inadequacy in terms of protein diet. In these farms, the milk samples collected from bulk milk were also characterized by the very low MUN values that were presented.