Unity and Multiplicity in Plato's diairetic method in the Sophist

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Oliveira Santos, Bárbara Helena
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/41468
Resumo: By placing diairesis in communion with the dialectic, Plato breaks with the dichotomous-univocal Parmenidean structure; in Fragment 2 of the poem On Nature by Parmenides, the goddess establishes that there are only two routes to the truth, one that is and one that is not. Of these two, Parmenides denies the second, stating that it is impossible to know what is not: for the pre-socratic philosopher to know something is related to what is, therefore, for him, it is impossible to know what is not. So, in Parmenides, there is a split between “being” and “not-being”. Therefore, our objective in this article, is to explore the implications, for the diairesis in Plato's Sophist, of the Parmenidean affirmation that non-being is impossible to know.
id UNB-18_012d158196f05af63c81896b9106964e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41468
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Unity and Multiplicity in Plato's diairetic method in the SophistUnidade e Multiplicidade no método diairético de Platão no SofistaPlatobeingontologyunitydialecticlanguagePlatãoSerOntologiaUnidadeDialéticaLinguagem By placing diairesis in communion with the dialectic, Plato breaks with the dichotomous-univocal Parmenidean structure; in Fragment 2 of the poem On Nature by Parmenides, the goddess establishes that there are only two routes to the truth, one that is and one that is not. Of these two, Parmenides denies the second, stating that it is impossible to know what is not: for the pre-socratic philosopher to know something is related to what is, therefore, for him, it is impossible to know what is not. So, in Parmenides, there is a split between “being” and “not-being”. Therefore, our objective in this article, is to explore the implications, for the diairesis in Plato's Sophist, of the Parmenidean affirmation that non-being is impossible to know. Ao colocar a diairesis em comunhão com a dialética, Platão rompe com a estrutura dicotômica-unívoca parmenídica; no Fragmento 2 do Poema Da Natureza, a deusa estabelece que há apenas dois caminhos para a verdade, um que é e outro que não é. Desses dois caminhos, Parmênides nega o segundo, afirmando que é impossível conhecer o que não é: para o filósofo préssocrático conhecer algo está relacionado ao é, logo, para ele, é impossível conhecer o que não é. De maneira que há, em Parmênides, uma cisão entre “ser” e “não-ser”. O desafio, ao qual nos propomos neste artigo, é explorar as implicações, para a diairesis no Sofista de Platão, quanto à afirmação parmenídica sobre a impossibilidade cognoscível a respeito do não-ser. Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2021-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/4146810.14195/1984-249X_31_30Revista Archai; No. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)Archai Journal; n. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)1984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_31reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/41468/32211Copyright (c) 2021 Bárbara Helena de Oliveira Santoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Oliveira Santos, Bárbara Helena2022-01-24T18:29:19Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41468Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2022-01-24T18:29:19Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Unity and Multiplicity in Plato's diairetic method in the Sophist
Unidade e Multiplicidade no método diairético de Platão no Sofista
title Unity and Multiplicity in Plato's diairetic method in the Sophist
spellingShingle Unity and Multiplicity in Plato's diairetic method in the Sophist
de Oliveira Santos, Bárbara Helena
Plato
being
ontology
unity
dialectic
language
Platão
Ser
Ontologia
Unidade
Dialética
Linguagem
title_short Unity and Multiplicity in Plato's diairetic method in the Sophist
title_full Unity and Multiplicity in Plato's diairetic method in the Sophist
title_fullStr Unity and Multiplicity in Plato's diairetic method in the Sophist
title_full_unstemmed Unity and Multiplicity in Plato's diairetic method in the Sophist
title_sort Unity and Multiplicity in Plato's diairetic method in the Sophist
author de Oliveira Santos, Bárbara Helena
author_facet de Oliveira Santos, Bárbara Helena
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Oliveira Santos, Bárbara Helena
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Plato
being
ontology
unity
dialectic
language
Platão
Ser
Ontologia
Unidade
Dialética
Linguagem
topic Plato
being
ontology
unity
dialectic
language
Platão
Ser
Ontologia
Unidade
Dialética
Linguagem
description By placing diairesis in communion with the dialectic, Plato breaks with the dichotomous-univocal Parmenidean structure; in Fragment 2 of the poem On Nature by Parmenides, the goddess establishes that there are only two routes to the truth, one that is and one that is not. Of these two, Parmenides denies the second, stating that it is impossible to know what is not: for the pre-socratic philosopher to know something is related to what is, therefore, for him, it is impossible to know what is not. So, in Parmenides, there is a split between “being” and “not-being”. Therefore, our objective in this article, is to explore the implications, for the diairesis in Plato's Sophist, of the Parmenidean affirmation that non-being is impossible to know.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articles
Artigos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/41468
10.14195/1984-249X_31_30
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/41468
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_31_30
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/41468/32211
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Bárbara Helena de Oliveira Santos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Bárbara Helena de Oliveira Santos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)
Archai Journal; n. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)
1984-249X
2179-4960
10.14195/1984-249X_31
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319945724985344

Registros relacionados