Fedón, 69c:: ¿por qué los βάκχοι son los verdaderos filósofos?
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Título da fonte: | Revista Archai (Online) |
| Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8636 |
Resumo: | Abstract: The paper analyses Phaedo, 69c, with the aim of answering two questions: 1) why Socrates quote an Orphic text, specifying that it has a hidden meaning (αἰνίττεσθαι), and 2) how he comes to the conclusion that men called βάκχοι by the Orphics are the true philosophers. The repeated alusion to “risk” (κίνδυνος, κινδυνεÏω) in the dialog is pointed out and the procedure of αἰνίττεσθαι (a sort of codifying poetic text) as a symbolic manner of referring to deep truth is analysed. On the other hand, it is highlighted how the philosopher considers that requirements for salvation in the τελεταί (to be μεμυημÎνος, κεκαθαÏμÎνος, τετελεσμÎνος, βεβακχευμÎνος) can only be really reached practising philosophy. Keywords: Plato, Phaedo, symbolic language, salvation. |
| id |
UNB-18_0754ab2cb2d0f583915ab184891ed0cf |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8636 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNB-18 |
| network_name_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Fedón, 69c:: ¿por qué los βάκχοι son los verdaderos filósofos?PlatoPhaedosymbolic languagesalvationAbstract: The paper analyses Phaedo, 69c, with the aim of answering two questions: 1) why Socrates quote an Orphic text, specifying that it has a hidden meaning (αἰνίττεσθαι), and 2) how he comes to the conclusion that men called βάκχοι by the Orphics are the true philosophers. The repeated alusion to “risk” (κίνδυνος, κινδυνεÏω) in the dialog is pointed out and the procedure of αἰνίττεσθαι (a sort of codifying poetic text) as a symbolic manner of referring to deep truth is analysed. On the other hand, it is highlighted how the philosopher considers that requirements for salvation in the τελεταί (to be μεμυημÎνος, κεκαθαÏμÎνος, τετελεσμÎνος, βεβακχευμÎνος) can only be really reached practising philosophy. Keywords: Plato, Phaedo, symbolic language, salvation.Resumen: A partir del análisis de Fedón, 69c se trata de dar respuesta a dos preguntas: 1) por qué Sócrates cita un texto órfico, explicitando que tiene un sentido oculto (αἰνίττεσθαι), y 2) cómo llega a la conclusión de que los individuos a los que los órficos denominan βάκχοι son los verdaderos filósofos. Se pone de relieve la reiterada alusión al “riesgo” (κίνδυνος, κινδυνεÏω) en el diálogo, se analiza el procedimiento del αἰνίττεσθαι como una manera simbólica de referirse a verdades profundas, una especie de codificación del texto poético, y se pone de manifiesto cómo el filósofo considera que los requisitos de la salvación en las τελεταί (ser μεμυημÎνος, κεκαθαÏμÎνος, τετελεσμÎνος, βεβακχευμÎνος), solo se alcanzan verdaderamente a través de la filosofía. Palabras clave: Platón, Fedón, lenguaje simbólico, salvación.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2015-12-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDossierDossiêapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/863610.14195/1984-249X_16_4Revista Archai; No. 16 (2016): Revista Archai nº16 (janeiro, 2016); 77Archai Journal; n. 16 (2016): Revista Archai nº16 (janeiro, 2016); 771984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_16reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBspahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8636/7217Bernabe, Albertoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-06-07T18:08:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8636Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2018-06-07T18:08:11Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fedón, 69c:: ¿por qué los βάκχοι son los verdaderos filósofos? |
| title |
Fedón, 69c:: ¿por qué los βάκχοι son los verdaderos filósofos? |
| spellingShingle |
Fedón, 69c:: ¿por qué los βάκχοι son los verdaderos filósofos? Bernabe, Alberto Plato Phaedo symbolic language salvation |
| title_short |
Fedón, 69c:: ¿por qué los βάκχοι son los verdaderos filósofos? |
| title_full |
Fedón, 69c:: ¿por qué los βάκχοι son los verdaderos filósofos? |
| title_fullStr |
Fedón, 69c:: ¿por qué los βάκχοι son los verdaderos filósofos? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Fedón, 69c:: ¿por qué los βάκχοι son los verdaderos filósofos? |
| title_sort |
Fedón, 69c:: ¿por qué los βάκχοι son los verdaderos filósofos? |
| author |
Bernabe, Alberto |
| author_facet |
Bernabe, Alberto |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bernabe, Alberto |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Plato Phaedo symbolic language salvation |
| topic |
Plato Phaedo symbolic language salvation |
| description |
Abstract: The paper analyses Phaedo, 69c, with the aim of answering two questions: 1) why Socrates quote an Orphic text, specifying that it has a hidden meaning (αἰνίττεσθαι), and 2) how he comes to the conclusion that men called βάκχοι by the Orphics are the true philosophers. The repeated alusion to “risk” (κίνδυνος, κινδυνεÏω) in the dialog is pointed out and the procedure of αἰνίττεσθαι (a sort of codifying poetic text) as a symbolic manner of referring to deep truth is analysed. On the other hand, it is highlighted how the philosopher considers that requirements for salvation in the τελεταί (to be μεμυημÎνος, κεκαθαÏμÎνος, τετελεσμÎνος, βεβακχευμÎνος) can only be really reached practising philosophy. Keywords: Plato, Phaedo, symbolic language, salvation. |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-26 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dossier Dossiê |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8636 10.14195/1984-249X_16_4 |
| url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8636 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.14195/1984-249X_16_4 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8636/7217 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai; No. 16 (2016): Revista Archai nº16 (janeiro, 2016); 77 Archai Journal; n. 16 (2016): Revista Archai nº16 (janeiro, 2016); 77 1984-249X 2179-4960 10.14195/1984-249X_16 reponame:Revista Archai (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
| instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| instacron_str |
UNB |
| institution |
UNB |
| reponame_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
| collection |
Revista Archai (Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br |
| _version_ |
1798319944830550016 |