Ὑπόκρισις. From the art of performing to the art of deceiving

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Gustavo Bezerra do Nascimento
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12791
Resumo: This article aims to investigate the assumptions that lead to a conviction by moral philosophy of the various practices of deceit commonly involved under the name of hypocrisy. The argument is developed around three questions: first, on the assumptions under which the various practices and strategies of deceit ”“ such as: simulation, dissimulation and irony ”“ become a problem to moral philosophy. Secondly, in order to understand how the hypocrisy, originally assigned to the art of the actor, comes to be part of the moral sphere designating, as art of deception, the set of those morally reprehensible strategies. Finally, how could be set a way opposed to this conviction. As I argue, that would happen with a double presumption: a distinction of perspectives between deceiving and being deceived ”“ with their respective modes of evaluation ”“ and through a re-evaluation of thought forms linked to astute intelligence that the Greeks called metis. Under these assumptions, hypocrisy could be linked to the ethical-poietical agenda of the creation of self.
id UNB-18_0975bedc8e03455f533dfa4201e3afd7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12791
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Ὑπόκρισις. From the art of performing to the art of deceivingὙπόκρισις. Da arte da atuação à arte do enganohipocrisiaenganoironiametishypocrisydeceitironymetisThis article aims to investigate the assumptions that lead to a conviction by moral philosophy of the various practices of deceit commonly involved under the name of hypocrisy. The argument is developed around three questions: first, on the assumptions under which the various practices and strategies of deceit ”“ such as: simulation, dissimulation and irony ”“ become a problem to moral philosophy. Secondly, in order to understand how the hypocrisy, originally assigned to the art of the actor, comes to be part of the moral sphere designating, as art of deception, the set of those morally reprehensible strategies. Finally, how could be set a way opposed to this conviction. As I argue, that would happen with a double presumption: a distinction of perspectives between deceiving and being deceived ”“ with their respective modes of evaluation ”“ and through a re-evaluation of thought forms linked to astute intelligence that the Greeks called metis. Under these assumptions, hypocrisy could be linked to the ethical-poietical agenda of the creation of self.Pretende-se aqui investigar os pressupostos que levam a uma condenação pela filosofia moral das diversas práticas de engano comumente envolvidas sob o nome de hipocrisia. A argumentação é desenvolvida em torno de três questões: primeiramente, acerca dos pressupostos sob os quais práticas como: simulação, dissimulação e ironia vêm a se tornar um problema à filosofia moral. Depois, no sentido de se compreender como a hipocrisia, originalmente atribuída à arte do ator, vem a fazer parte da esfera moral designando, como arte do engano, o conjunto daquelas estratégias moralmente condenáveis. Por fim, de que maneira se poderia pensar uma via de contraposição a essa condenação. Como defendo, ela aconteceria sob um duplo pressuposto: o de uma distinção de perspectivas entre enganar e ser enganado ”“ com seus respectivos modos de avaliação ”“ e por meio de uma reavaliação das formas de pensamento atreladas à inteligência astuciosa que os gregos nomeavam por metis. Sob tais pressupostos, a hipocrisia poderia ser associada à pauta ético-poiética da criação de si.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2018-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/1279110.14195/1984-249X_24_3Revista Archai; No. 24 (2018): Archai Journal nº24 (September, 2018); 111Archai Journal; n. 24 (2018): Revista Archai nº24 (setembro, 2018); 1111984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_24reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12791/11177Costa, Gustavo Bezerra do Nascimentoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-08-19T15:34:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12791Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2019-08-19T15:34:22Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ὑπόκρισις. From the art of performing to the art of deceiving
Ὑπόκρισις. Da arte da atuação à arte do engano
title Ὑπόκρισις. From the art of performing to the art of deceiving
spellingShingle Ὑπόκρισις. From the art of performing to the art of deceiving
Costa, Gustavo Bezerra do Nascimento
hipocrisia
engano
ironia
metis
hypocrisy
deceit
irony
metis
title_short Ὑπόκρισις. From the art of performing to the art of deceiving
title_full Ὑπόκρισις. From the art of performing to the art of deceiving
title_fullStr Ὑπόκρισις. From the art of performing to the art of deceiving
title_full_unstemmed Ὑπόκρισις. From the art of performing to the art of deceiving
title_sort Ὑπόκρισις. From the art of performing to the art of deceiving
author Costa, Gustavo Bezerra do Nascimento
author_facet Costa, Gustavo Bezerra do Nascimento
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Gustavo Bezerra do Nascimento
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv hipocrisia
engano
ironia
metis
hypocrisy
deceit
irony
metis
topic hipocrisia
engano
ironia
metis
hypocrisy
deceit
irony
metis
description This article aims to investigate the assumptions that lead to a conviction by moral philosophy of the various practices of deceit commonly involved under the name of hypocrisy. The argument is developed around three questions: first, on the assumptions under which the various practices and strategies of deceit ”“ such as: simulation, dissimulation and irony ”“ become a problem to moral philosophy. Secondly, in order to understand how the hypocrisy, originally assigned to the art of the actor, comes to be part of the moral sphere designating, as art of deception, the set of those morally reprehensible strategies. Finally, how could be set a way opposed to this conviction. As I argue, that would happen with a double presumption: a distinction of perspectives between deceiving and being deceived ”“ with their respective modes of evaluation ”“ and through a re-evaluation of thought forms linked to astute intelligence that the Greeks called metis. Under these assumptions, hypocrisy could be linked to the ethical-poietical agenda of the creation of self.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articles
Artigos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12791
10.14195/1984-249X_24_3
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12791
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_24_3
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12791/11177
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 24 (2018): Archai Journal nº24 (September, 2018); 111
Archai Journal; n. 24 (2018): Revista Archai nº24 (setembro, 2018); 111
1984-249X
2179-4960
10.14195/1984-249X_24
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319945302409216

Registros relacionados