Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus’ Fragment B9
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Archai (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/41457 |
Resumo: | Melissus’ fragment B9, where he claims that being has no body and no thickness, raises the question of how being can be extended and full and at the same time incorporeal. Most recent interpretations tried to avoid lending to “body” the meaning of “physical body”. My aim in this paper is to reconstruct Melissus’ notion of body, by examining its connection to “thickness”. I show that Melissus meant by “thick” something that has distinct parts and therefore supports in B9 the indivisibility of being. I then indicate that he relied on the contrast between soul and body for his conception of corporeality, by highlighting that by Presocratic thinkers, the soul was considered as “thin” and regarded as something that could be exempt of the division into parts. I conclude that even though Melissus’ notion of incorporeality is very different from the one Plato will develop, he made a huge step toward its conceptualization. |
id |
UNB-18_1c604e1b39c4070240bcd83f6549ca73 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41457 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-18 |
network_name_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus’ Fragment B9Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus’ Fragment B9MelissusincorporealitydivisionbodysoulMelissusincorporealitydivisionbodysoulMelissus’ fragment B9, where he claims that being has no body and no thickness, raises the question of how being can be extended and full and at the same time incorporeal. Most recent interpretations tried to avoid lending to “body” the meaning of “physical body”. My aim in this paper is to reconstruct Melissus’ notion of body, by examining its connection to “thickness”. I show that Melissus meant by “thick” something that has distinct parts and therefore supports in B9 the indivisibility of being. I then indicate that he relied on the contrast between soul and body for his conception of corporeality, by highlighting that by Presocratic thinkers, the soul was considered as “thin” and regarded as something that could be exempt of the division into parts. I conclude that even though Melissus’ notion of incorporeality is very different from the one Plato will develop, he made a huge step toward its conceptualization. Melissus’ fragment B9, where he claims that being has no body and no thickness, raises the question of how being can be extended and full and at the same time incorporeal. Most recent interpretations tried to avoid lending to “body” the meaning of “physical body”. My aim in this paper is to reconstruct Melissus’ notion of body, by examining its connection to “thickness”. I show that Melissus meant by “thick” something that has distinct parts and therefore supports in B9 the indivisibility of being. I then indicate that he relied on the contrast between soul and body for his conception of corporeality, by highlighting that by Presocratic thinkers, the soul was considered as “thin” and regarded as something that could be exempt of the division into parts. I conclude that even though Melissus’ notion of incorporeality is very different from the one Plato will develop, he made a huge step toward its conceptualization. Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2021-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/4145710.14195/1984-249X_31_23Revista Archai; No. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)Archai Journal; n. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)1984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_31reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/41457/32200Copyright (c) 2021 Mathilde Brémondhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrémond, Mathilde2022-01-25T02:00:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41457Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2022-01-25T02:00:31Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus’ Fragment B9 Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus’ Fragment B9 |
title |
Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus’ Fragment B9 |
spellingShingle |
Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus’ Fragment B9 Brémond, Mathilde Melissus incorporeality division body soul Melissus incorporeality division body soul |
title_short |
Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus’ Fragment B9 |
title_full |
Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus’ Fragment B9 |
title_fullStr |
Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus’ Fragment B9 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus’ Fragment B9 |
title_sort |
Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus’ Fragment B9 |
author |
Brémond, Mathilde |
author_facet |
Brémond, Mathilde |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brémond, Mathilde |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Melissus incorporeality division body soul Melissus incorporeality division body soul |
topic |
Melissus incorporeality division body soul Melissus incorporeality division body soul |
description |
Melissus’ fragment B9, where he claims that being has no body and no thickness, raises the question of how being can be extended and full and at the same time incorporeal. Most recent interpretations tried to avoid lending to “body” the meaning of “physical body”. My aim in this paper is to reconstruct Melissus’ notion of body, by examining its connection to “thickness”. I show that Melissus meant by “thick” something that has distinct parts and therefore supports in B9 the indivisibility of being. I then indicate that he relied on the contrast between soul and body for his conception of corporeality, by highlighting that by Presocratic thinkers, the soul was considered as “thin” and regarded as something that could be exempt of the division into parts. I conclude that even though Melissus’ notion of incorporeality is very different from the one Plato will develop, he made a huge step toward its conceptualization. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/41457 10.14195/1984-249X_31_23 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/41457 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14195/1984-249X_31_23 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/41457/32200 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Mathilde Brémond https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Mathilde Brémond https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai; No. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021) Archai Journal; n. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021) 1984-249X 2179-4960 10.14195/1984-249X_31 reponame:Revista Archai (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
collection |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br |
_version_ |
1798319945699819520 |