The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ponce Pérez, José Luis
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52271
Resumo: This article answer what could be the distinction that the Stoics established between philosophy and the kata philosophian logos, according to the report by D.L., VII, 39-41. In this place I distance from the scholars who consider that the distinction is ontological, this is, that the kata philosophian logos refers to the discursive presentation of Stoic dogmas, whose nature is incorporeal, while the philosophy refers to a disposition of the soul, whose nature is corporeal. I rather propose that both are dispositiones or states of the rational part of the soul and that the difference is in the degree of perfection that they have accomplished.
id UNB-18_2ffdabec00d83566b0cdcf1f0ed63697
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52271
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in StoicismLa distinción entre la filosofía y el kata philosophian logos en el estoicismoDiscoursePhilosophical teachingChrysippusReasonZeno of TarsusDiscursoEnseñanza filosóficaCrisipoRazónZenón de TarsoThis article answer what could be the distinction that the Stoics established between philosophy and the kata philosophian logos, according to the report by D.L., VII, 39-41. In this place I distance from the scholars who consider that the distinction is ontological, this is, that the kata philosophian logos refers to the discursive presentation of Stoic dogmas, whose nature is incorporeal, while the philosophy refers to a disposition of the soul, whose nature is corporeal. I rather propose that both are dispositiones or states of the rational part of the soul and that the difference is in the degree of perfection that they have accomplished.Este artículo se ocupa de responder cuál sería la distinción que los estoicos establecerían entre la filosofía y el kata philosophian logos, acorde al reporte de D.L., VII, 39-41. En este lugar me aparto de los estudiosos que consideran que la distinción es ontológica, es decir, quienes proponen que el kata philosophian logos haría referencia a la presentación discursiva de los dogmas estoicos, cuya naturaleza es incorpórea, en tanto que la filosofía haría referencia a una disposición del alma, cuya naturaleza sería corpórea. Propondré, más bien, que los dos son disposiciones o estados de la parte racional del alma, y que la diferencia entre ellos está en el grado de perfección que han alcanzado.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2023-11-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/5227110.14195/1984-249X_33_29Revista Archai; No. 33 (2023): No. 33 (2023): Archai 33 (2023); e03329Archai Journal; n. 33 (2023): No. 33 (2023): Archai 33 (2023); e033291984-249X2179-4960reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBspahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52271/39344Copyright (c) 2023 José Luis Ponce Pérezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPonce Pérez, José Luis2024-01-15T21:23:55Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52271Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2024-01-15T21:23:55Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism
La distinción entre la filosofía y el kata philosophian logos en el estoicismo
title The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism
spellingShingle The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism
Ponce Pérez, José Luis
Discourse
Philosophical teaching
Chrysippus
Reason
Zeno of Tarsus
Discurso
Enseñanza filosófica
Crisipo
Razón
Zenón de Tarso
title_short The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism
title_full The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism
title_fullStr The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism
title_full_unstemmed The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism
title_sort The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism
author Ponce Pérez, José Luis
author_facet Ponce Pérez, José Luis
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ponce Pérez, José Luis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Discourse
Philosophical teaching
Chrysippus
Reason
Zeno of Tarsus
Discurso
Enseñanza filosófica
Crisipo
Razón
Zenón de Tarso
topic Discourse
Philosophical teaching
Chrysippus
Reason
Zeno of Tarsus
Discurso
Enseñanza filosófica
Crisipo
Razón
Zenón de Tarso
description This article answer what could be the distinction that the Stoics established between philosophy and the kata philosophian logos, according to the report by D.L., VII, 39-41. In this place I distance from the scholars who consider that the distinction is ontological, this is, that the kata philosophian logos refers to the discursive presentation of Stoic dogmas, whose nature is incorporeal, while the philosophy refers to a disposition of the soul, whose nature is corporeal. I rather propose that both are dispositiones or states of the rational part of the soul and that the difference is in the degree of perfection that they have accomplished.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articles
Artigos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52271
10.14195/1984-249X_33_29
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52271
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_33_29
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52271/39344
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 José Luis Ponce Pérez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 José Luis Ponce Pérez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 33 (2023): No. 33 (2023): Archai 33 (2023); e03329
Archai Journal; n. 33 (2023): No. 33 (2023): Archai 33 (2023); e03329
1984-249X
2179-4960
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319942975619072

Registros relacionados