The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Revista Archai (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52271 |
Resumo: | This article answer what could be the distinction that the Stoics established between philosophy and the kata philosophian logos, according to the report by D.L., VII, 39-41. In this place I distance from the scholars who consider that the distinction is ontological, this is, that the kata philosophian logos refers to the discursive presentation of Stoic dogmas, whose nature is incorporeal, while the philosophy refers to a disposition of the soul, whose nature is corporeal. I rather propose that both are dispositiones or states of the rational part of the soul and that the difference is in the degree of perfection that they have accomplished. |
id |
UNB-18_2ffdabec00d83566b0cdcf1f0ed63697 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52271 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-18 |
network_name_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in StoicismLa distinción entre la filosofía y el kata philosophian logos en el estoicismoDiscoursePhilosophical teachingChrysippusReasonZeno of TarsusDiscursoEnseñanza filosóficaCrisipoRazónZenón de TarsoThis article answer what could be the distinction that the Stoics established between philosophy and the kata philosophian logos, according to the report by D.L., VII, 39-41. In this place I distance from the scholars who consider that the distinction is ontological, this is, that the kata philosophian logos refers to the discursive presentation of Stoic dogmas, whose nature is incorporeal, while the philosophy refers to a disposition of the soul, whose nature is corporeal. I rather propose that both are dispositiones or states of the rational part of the soul and that the difference is in the degree of perfection that they have accomplished.Este artículo se ocupa de responder cuál sería la distinción que los estoicos establecerían entre la filosofía y el kata philosophian logos, acorde al reporte de D.L., VII, 39-41. En este lugar me aparto de los estudiosos que consideran que la distinción es ontológica, es decir, quienes proponen que el kata philosophian logos haría referencia a la presentación discursiva de los dogmas estoicos, cuya naturaleza es incorpórea, en tanto que la filosofía haría referencia a una disposición del alma, cuya naturaleza sería corpórea. Propondré, más bien, que los dos son disposiciones o estados de la parte racional del alma, y que la diferencia entre ellos está en el grado de perfección que han alcanzado.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2023-11-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/5227110.14195/1984-249X_33_29Revista Archai; No. 33 (2023): No. 33 (2023): Archai 33 (2023); e03329Archai Journal; n. 33 (2023): No. 33 (2023): Archai 33 (2023); e033291984-249X2179-4960reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBspahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52271/39344Copyright (c) 2023 José Luis Ponce Pérezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPonce Pérez, José Luis2024-01-15T21:23:55Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52271Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2024-01-15T21:23:55Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism La distinción entre la filosofía y el kata philosophian logos en el estoicismo |
title |
The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism |
spellingShingle |
The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism Ponce Pérez, José Luis Discourse Philosophical teaching Chrysippus Reason Zeno of Tarsus Discurso Enseñanza filosófica Crisipo Razón Zenón de Tarso |
title_short |
The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism |
title_full |
The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism |
title_fullStr |
The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism |
title_sort |
The Distinction between Philosophy and the kata philosophian logos in Stoicism |
author |
Ponce Pérez, José Luis |
author_facet |
Ponce Pérez, José Luis |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ponce Pérez, José Luis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Discourse Philosophical teaching Chrysippus Reason Zeno of Tarsus Discurso Enseñanza filosófica Crisipo Razón Zenón de Tarso |
topic |
Discourse Philosophical teaching Chrysippus Reason Zeno of Tarsus Discurso Enseñanza filosófica Crisipo Razón Zenón de Tarso |
description |
This article answer what could be the distinction that the Stoics established between philosophy and the kata philosophian logos, according to the report by D.L., VII, 39-41. In this place I distance from the scholars who consider that the distinction is ontological, this is, that the kata philosophian logos refers to the discursive presentation of Stoic dogmas, whose nature is incorporeal, while the philosophy refers to a disposition of the soul, whose nature is corporeal. I rather propose that both are dispositiones or states of the rational part of the soul and that the difference is in the degree of perfection that they have accomplished. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articles Artigos |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52271 10.14195/1984-249X_33_29 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52271 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14195/1984-249X_33_29 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52271/39344 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 José Luis Ponce Pérez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 José Luis Ponce Pérez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai; No. 33 (2023): No. 33 (2023): Archai 33 (2023); e03329 Archai Journal; n. 33 (2023): No. 33 (2023): Archai 33 (2023); e03329 1984-249X 2179-4960 reponame:Revista Archai (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
collection |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br |
_version_ |
1798319942975619072 |