Xenophon’s Oeconomicus: the “maîtresse de la maison”

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bevilacqua, Fiorenza
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: ita
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38519
Resumo: Xenophon’s Oeconomicusincludes an interesting treatise on married life, at the hearth of which is the figure of Ischomachus’ wife, such as she is described by Ischomachus’ words to Socrates. It is an almost innovative figure, because she shares the management of the oikosas being responsible for what is carried out within the oikos: her role is different from her husband’s, who runs and manages what is carried out outside of the oikos. Therefore husband’s and wife’s tasks are different, though complementary. The difference in inclinations and, therefore, roles is shown as established by god, nature (as an instrument of god) and custom (nomos). So Ischomachus’ wife is a collaborator and companion of her husband, even though she does not have an equal relation with her him: she manages the activities and people within the oikosaccording to her husband’s directives. Also in the sphere of sexual life she has to conform to his desires and convictions; her own status as a wife will be preserved only if she meets his expectations: paradoxically her own autonomy is other-directed. Even if she may be considered a “maîtresse de la maison”, nevertheless, as Foucault outlined with a very incisive expression, she is anyway the “maîtresse obéissante de la maison”.      
id UNB-18_578023f66313843a084880e14858466b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38519
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Xenophon’s Oeconomicus: the “maîtresse de la maison”L'Economico di Senofonte: la “maîtresse de la maison”oikosmanagementwifecompanionoikosgestionemogliecompagna Xenophon’s Oeconomicusincludes an interesting treatise on married life, at the hearth of which is the figure of Ischomachus’ wife, such as she is described by Ischomachus’ words to Socrates. It is an almost innovative figure, because she shares the management of the oikosas being responsible for what is carried out within the oikos: her role is different from her husband’s, who runs and manages what is carried out outside of the oikos. Therefore husband’s and wife’s tasks are different, though complementary. The difference in inclinations and, therefore, roles is shown as established by god, nature (as an instrument of god) and custom (nomos). So Ischomachus’ wife is a collaborator and companion of her husband, even though she does not have an equal relation with her him: she manages the activities and people within the oikosaccording to her husband’s directives. Also in the sphere of sexual life she has to conform to his desires and convictions; her own status as a wife will be preserved only if she meets his expectations: paradoxically her own autonomy is other-directed. Even if she may be considered a “maîtresse de la maison”, nevertheless, as Foucault outlined with a very incisive expression, she is anyway the “maîtresse obéissante de la maison”.        L’Economicodi Senofonte contiene un interessante trattato sulla vita matrimoniale: al centro di questo trattato si colloca la figura della moglie di Iscomaco, così come viene delineata da quanto quest’ultimo narra a Socrate. Una figura in parte innovativa, in quanto viene associata alla gestione dell’oikoscome responsabile di quanto si svolge all’interno della casa: un ruolo diverso da quello del marito, che si occupa e dirige ciò che si svolge all’esterno: i compiti di moglie e marito risultano quindi diversi ma complementari. Questa differenza di attitudini e quindi di ruoli è presentata come voluta sia dalla divinità, sia dalla natura (in quanto strumento delladivinità) sia dalla consuetudine (nomos). La moglie di Iscomaco viene quindi a configurarsi come una collaboratrice e una compagna per il marito. Tuttavia questa moglie non intrattiene con il marito una relazione paritaria: infatti gestisce attività e persone all’interno della casa secondo le direttive impartite dal marito; anche nella sfera della vita sessuale deve adeguarsi ai desideri e alle convinzioni di Iscomaco; il suo stesso status di moglie sarà mantenuto soltanto se lei risponderà alle sue aspettative: paradossalmente la sua stessa autonomia è in realtà eterodiretta. Se pure può considerarsi una “maîtresse de la maison”, tuttavia, come ha sottolineato con una formula efficacissima Foucault, si tratta comunque di una “maîtresse obéissante de la maison”. Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2021-06-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/3851910.14195/1984-249X_31_09Revista Archai; No. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)Archai Journal; n. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)1984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_31reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBitahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38519/30049Copyright (c) 2021 Fiorenza Bevilacquahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBevilacqua, Fiorenza2021-06-18T18:41:44Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38519Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2021-06-18T18:41:44Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Xenophon’s Oeconomicus: the “maîtresse de la maison”
L'Economico di Senofonte: la “maîtresse de la maison”
title Xenophon’s Oeconomicus: the “maîtresse de la maison”
spellingShingle Xenophon’s Oeconomicus: the “maîtresse de la maison”
Bevilacqua, Fiorenza
oikos
management
wife
companion
oikos
gestione
moglie
compagna
title_short Xenophon’s Oeconomicus: the “maîtresse de la maison”
title_full Xenophon’s Oeconomicus: the “maîtresse de la maison”
title_fullStr Xenophon’s Oeconomicus: the “maîtresse de la maison”
title_full_unstemmed Xenophon’s Oeconomicus: the “maîtresse de la maison”
title_sort Xenophon’s Oeconomicus: the “maîtresse de la maison”
author Bevilacqua, Fiorenza
author_facet Bevilacqua, Fiorenza
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bevilacqua, Fiorenza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv oikos
management
wife
companion
oikos
gestione
moglie
compagna
topic oikos
management
wife
companion
oikos
gestione
moglie
compagna
description Xenophon’s Oeconomicusincludes an interesting treatise on married life, at the hearth of which is the figure of Ischomachus’ wife, such as she is described by Ischomachus’ words to Socrates. It is an almost innovative figure, because she shares the management of the oikosas being responsible for what is carried out within the oikos: her role is different from her husband’s, who runs and manages what is carried out outside of the oikos. Therefore husband’s and wife’s tasks are different, though complementary. The difference in inclinations and, therefore, roles is shown as established by god, nature (as an instrument of god) and custom (nomos). So Ischomachus’ wife is a collaborator and companion of her husband, even though she does not have an equal relation with her him: she manages the activities and people within the oikosaccording to her husband’s directives. Also in the sphere of sexual life she has to conform to his desires and convictions; her own status as a wife will be preserved only if she meets his expectations: paradoxically her own autonomy is other-directed. Even if she may be considered a “maîtresse de la maison”, nevertheless, as Foucault outlined with a very incisive expression, she is anyway the “maîtresse obéissante de la maison”.      
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38519
10.14195/1984-249X_31_09
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38519
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_31_09
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv ita
language ita
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/38519/30049
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Fiorenza Bevilacqua
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Fiorenza Bevilacqua
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)
Archai Journal; n. 31 (2021): Archai 31 (2021)
1984-249X
2179-4960
10.14195/1984-249X_31
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319945671507968