The gap between Parmenides’ argument on Being and his cosmology in the Aristotelian account

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Loureiro Conte, Bruno
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52265
Resumo: In some of the Aristotelian accounts, Parmenides’ thesis is construed in opposition to the philosophy of nature; on the other hand, he is also depicted, in a different context, as a cosmologist, to whom the Stagirite (and a long tradition afterwards, ending with Simplicius) ascribes a theory of becoming and its principles. In this paper, I exhibit and analyse the relevant passages from Physics I 1-3, Metaphysics I 3 and 5 and On generation and corruption I 3, providing an interpretation that aims to solve the apparent paradox, making sense of the information we can gather from Aristotle’s and Simplicius’ testimonies. Eventually, I propose a construal of the Two Ways of fr. 2 with an emphasis on the predicative reading of einai, which could hint at the Parmenidean approach to cosmology that runs in parallel with the argument on Being.
id UNB-18_b0ee2b64513e373a623392d71485c50d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52265
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The gap between Parmenides’ argument on Being and his cosmology in the Aristotelian accountParmenidesEleatismAristotleMonismCosmologyIn some of the Aristotelian accounts, Parmenides’ thesis is construed in opposition to the philosophy of nature; on the other hand, he is also depicted, in a different context, as a cosmologist, to whom the Stagirite (and a long tradition afterwards, ending with Simplicius) ascribes a theory of becoming and its principles. In this paper, I exhibit and analyse the relevant passages from Physics I 1-3, Metaphysics I 3 and 5 and On generation and corruption I 3, providing an interpretation that aims to solve the apparent paradox, making sense of the information we can gather from Aristotle’s and Simplicius’ testimonies. Eventually, I propose a construal of the Two Ways of fr. 2 with an emphasis on the predicative reading of einai, which could hint at the Parmenidean approach to cosmology that runs in parallel with the argument on Being.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2023-11-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/5226510.14195/1984-249X_33_25Revista Archai; No. 33 (2023): No. 33 (2023): Archai 33 (2023); e03325Archai Journal; n. 33 (2023): No. 33 (2023): Archai 33 (2023); e033251984-249X2179-4960reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52265/39340Copyright (c) 2023 Bruno Loureiro Contehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLoureiro Conte, Bruno2024-01-15T20:45:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52265Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2024-01-15T20:45:23Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The gap between Parmenides’ argument on Being and his cosmology in the Aristotelian account
title The gap between Parmenides’ argument on Being and his cosmology in the Aristotelian account
spellingShingle The gap between Parmenides’ argument on Being and his cosmology in the Aristotelian account
Loureiro Conte, Bruno
Parmenides
Eleatism
Aristotle
Monism
Cosmology
title_short The gap between Parmenides’ argument on Being and his cosmology in the Aristotelian account
title_full The gap between Parmenides’ argument on Being and his cosmology in the Aristotelian account
title_fullStr The gap between Parmenides’ argument on Being and his cosmology in the Aristotelian account
title_full_unstemmed The gap between Parmenides’ argument on Being and his cosmology in the Aristotelian account
title_sort The gap between Parmenides’ argument on Being and his cosmology in the Aristotelian account
author Loureiro Conte, Bruno
author_facet Loureiro Conte, Bruno
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Loureiro Conte, Bruno
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Parmenides
Eleatism
Aristotle
Monism
Cosmology
topic Parmenides
Eleatism
Aristotle
Monism
Cosmology
description In some of the Aristotelian accounts, Parmenides’ thesis is construed in opposition to the philosophy of nature; on the other hand, he is also depicted, in a different context, as a cosmologist, to whom the Stagirite (and a long tradition afterwards, ending with Simplicius) ascribes a theory of becoming and its principles. In this paper, I exhibit and analyse the relevant passages from Physics I 1-3, Metaphysics I 3 and 5 and On generation and corruption I 3, providing an interpretation that aims to solve the apparent paradox, making sense of the information we can gather from Aristotle’s and Simplicius’ testimonies. Eventually, I propose a construal of the Two Ways of fr. 2 with an emphasis on the predicative reading of einai, which could hint at the Parmenidean approach to cosmology that runs in parallel with the argument on Being.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articles
Artigos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52265
10.14195/1984-249X_33_25
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52265
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_33_25
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/52265/39340
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Bruno Loureiro Conte
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Bruno Loureiro Conte
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 33 (2023): No. 33 (2023): Archai 33 (2023); e03325
Archai Journal; n. 33 (2023): No. 33 (2023): Archai 33 (2023); e03325
1984-249X
2179-4960
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319942968279040