Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics I.6

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Angioni, Lucas
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/3872
Resumo: I discuss the methodological passage in the beginning of Ethica EudemiaI.6 (1216b26-35), which has received attention in connection with Aristotle’s notion of dialectic and his methodology in Ethics. My central focus is not to discuss whether Aristotle is prescribing and using what has been called the method of endoxa. I will focus on how this passage coheres with the remaining parts of the same chapter, which also are advancing methodological remarks. My claim is that the method of Ethica Eudemia I.6 is in agreement with many features of Aristotle’s theory of explanation as presented in the Posterior Analytics: Aristotle’s main concern is a warning against misuses of explanatory arguments.
id UNB-18_c20bc2bd5cbab563d7cd094114a1ec0f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3872
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics I.6MethodologyExplanationEthicsEndoxaAristotleI discuss the methodological passage in the beginning of Ethica EudemiaI.6 (1216b26-35), which has received attention in connection with Aristotle’s notion of dialectic and his methodology in Ethics. My central focus is not to discuss whether Aristotle is prescribing and using what has been called the method of endoxa. I will focus on how this passage coheres with the remaining parts of the same chapter, which also are advancing methodological remarks. My claim is that the method of Ethica Eudemia I.6 is in agreement with many features of Aristotle’s theory of explanation as presented in the Posterior Analytics: Aristotle’s main concern is a warning against misuses of explanatory arguments.I discuss the methodological passage in the beginning of Ethica EudemiaI.6 (1216b26-35), which has received attention in connection with Aristotle’s notion of dialectic and his methodology in Ethics. My central focus is not to discuss whether Aristotle is prescribing and using what has been called the method of endoxa. I will focus on how this passage coheres with the remaining parts of the same chapter, which also are advancing methodological remarks. My claim is that the method of Ethica Eudemia I.6 is in agreement with many features of Aristotle’s theory of explanation as presented in the Posterior Analytics: Aristotle’s main concern is a warning against misuses of explanatory arguments.I discuss the methodological passage in the beginning of Ethica EudemiaI.6 (1216b26-35), which has received attention in connection with Aristotle’s notion of dialectic and his methodology in Ethics. My central focus is not to discuss whether Aristotle is prescribing and using what has been called the method of endoxa. I will focus on how this passage coheres with the remaining parts of the same chapter, which also are advancing methodological remarks. My claim is that the method of Ethica Eudemia I.6 is in agreement with many features of Aristotle’s theory of explanation as presented in the Posterior Analytics: Aristotle’s main concern is a warning against misuses of explanatory arguments.I discuss the methodological passage in the beginning of Ethica EudemiaI.6 (1216b26-35), which has received attention in connection with Aristotle’s notion of dialectic and his methodology in Ethics. My central focus is not to discuss whether Aristotle is prescribing and using what has been called the method of endoxa. I will focus on how this passage coheres with the remaining parts of the same chapter, which also are advancing methodological remarks. My claim is that the method of Ethica Eudemia I.6 is in agreement with many features of Aristotle’s theory of explanation as presented in the Posterior Analytics: Aristotle’s main concern is a warning against misuses of explanatory arguments.I discuss the methodological passage in the beginning of Ethica EudemiaI.6 (1216b26-35), which has received attention in connection with Aristotle’s notion of dialectic and his methodology in Ethics. My central focus is not to discuss whether Aristotle is prescribing and using what has been called the method of endoxa. I will focus on how this passage coheres with the remaining parts of the same chapter, which also are advancing methodological remarks. My claim is that the method of Ethica Eudemia I.6 is in agreement with many features of Aristotle’s theory of explanation as presented in the Posterior Analytics: Aristotle’s main concern is a warning against misuses of explanatory arguments.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2017-05-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDossierDossiêapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/387210.14195/1984-249X_20_8Revista Archai; No. 20 (2017): Revista Archai nº20 (Maio, 2017); 191Archai Journal; n. 20 (2017): Revista Archai nº20 (Maio, 2017); 1911984-249X2179-4960reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/3872/3542Angioni, Lucasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-06-08T16:06:40Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3872Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2018-06-08T16:06:40Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics I.6
title Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics I.6
spellingShingle Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics I.6
Angioni, Lucas
Methodology
Explanation
Ethics
Endoxa
Aristotle
title_short Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics I.6
title_full Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics I.6
title_fullStr Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics I.6
title_full_unstemmed Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics I.6
title_sort Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics I.6
author Angioni, Lucas
author_facet Angioni, Lucas
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Angioni, Lucas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Methodology
Explanation
Ethics
Endoxa
Aristotle
topic Methodology
Explanation
Ethics
Endoxa
Aristotle
description I discuss the methodological passage in the beginning of Ethica EudemiaI.6 (1216b26-35), which has received attention in connection with Aristotle’s notion of dialectic and his methodology in Ethics. My central focus is not to discuss whether Aristotle is prescribing and using what has been called the method of endoxa. I will focus on how this passage coheres with the remaining parts of the same chapter, which also are advancing methodological remarks. My claim is that the method of Ethica Eudemia I.6 is in agreement with many features of Aristotle’s theory of explanation as presented in the Posterior Analytics: Aristotle’s main concern is a warning against misuses of explanatory arguments.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Dossier
Dossiê
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/3872
10.14195/1984-249X_20_8
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/3872
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_20_8
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/3872/3542
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 20 (2017): Revista Archai nº20 (Maio, 2017); 191
Archai Journal; n. 20 (2017): Revista Archai nº20 (Maio, 2017); 191
1984-249X
2179-4960
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319943589036032

Registros relacionados