Is ecolinguistics necessary?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ecolinguística |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/erbel/article/view/9688 |
Resumo: | This paper considers whether studies separate from more general linguistic enquiry are necessary at all if we do our general (diachronic and synchronic) nobly. The emphasis is on the eco- of ecolinguistics rather than the necessary. The argument is that the philosophical core of ecolinguistic research is far from new and exists and advances on perennial (historical) linguistic bedrock. The methodological and theoretical thrust of ecolinguistics can be posed as a logical extension of any detailed consideration of elements of analysis necessitated under what can be considered traditional general linguistics and a parameter rich sociolinguistics. It is argued the details of ecolinguistics have been, at least philosophically, addressed in earlier linguistic work, and that the fundaments of ecolinguistics ought not (necessarily) be new to linguistics and may merely be a recently developed appellative for what are recurrent concerns in linguistic science. The query is that if ecolinguistics is old (linguistic) wine freshly housed in new (ecologically focused) bottles, what do the monikers ecolinguistics and linguistic ecology as fields of research actually offer? Despite my critical position, I believe ecolinguistic studies do have a worthy contribution to make both to linguistics and to environmental studies research. |
id |
UNB-20_0d4d4002142893138e1a1db8b986eadb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9688 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-20 |
network_name_str |
Ecolinguística |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Is ecolinguistics necessary?Discurso; Estudos ambientais; Epistemologia; Ecologia da língua; Teoria linguística.Discourse; Environmental Studies; Epistemology; Language Ecology; Linguistic Theory.This paper considers whether studies separate from more general linguistic enquiry are necessary at all if we do our general (diachronic and synchronic) nobly. The emphasis is on the eco- of ecolinguistics rather than the necessary. The argument is that the philosophical core of ecolinguistic research is far from new and exists and advances on perennial (historical) linguistic bedrock. The methodological and theoretical thrust of ecolinguistics can be posed as a logical extension of any detailed consideration of elements of analysis necessitated under what can be considered traditional general linguistics and a parameter rich sociolinguistics. It is argued the details of ecolinguistics have been, at least philosophically, addressed in earlier linguistic work, and that the fundaments of ecolinguistics ought not (necessarily) be new to linguistics and may merely be a recently developed appellative for what are recurrent concerns in linguistic science. The query is that if ecolinguistics is old (linguistic) wine freshly housed in new (ecologically focused) bottles, what do the monikers ecolinguistics and linguistic ecology as fields of research actually offer? Despite my critical position, I believe ecolinguistic studies do have a worthy contribution to make both to linguistics and to environmental studies research.ste artigo indaga se os estudos ecolinguísticos, separados de uma linguística mais geral, afinal de contas são necessários se fizermos direito nossa linguística geral (diacrônica e sincrônica). A ênfase é sobre o eco- de ecolinguistica de preferência a necessário. A ideia é de que o cerne filosófico da pesquisa ecolinguística está longe de ser novo, e existe e tem evoluído sobre alicerces perenes (históricos). O impulso metodológico e teórico da ecolinguística pode ser apresentado como uma extensão lógica de qualquer consideração detalhada de elementos de análise necessários a propósito do que pode ser considerado linguística geral tradicional e uma sociolinguística ampla. Argumenta-se que os detalhes da ecolinguística têm sido abordados em trabalhos linguísticos anteriores, pelo menos filosofiamente, e que os fundamentos da ecolinguísica não são (necessariamente) novos na linguística, podendo ser um apelo recentemente desenvolvido para o que é matéria comum na ciência linguística. A questão é que se a ecolinguística é vinho (linguístico) velho recentemente guardado em garrafas novas (encaradas ecologicamente), o que os rótulos ecolinguística e ecologia linguística efetivamente oferecem como campos de pesquisa? A despeito de minha postura crítica, eu acredito que os estudos ecolinguísticos realmente têm uma grande contribuição a dar tanto à linguística quanto aos estudos ambientais.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística (UnB-PPGL)2016-09-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/erbel/article/view/9688Ecolinguística: Revista brasileira de ecologia e linguagem (ECO-REBEL); Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016); 36-43Ecolinguística: Revista brasileira de ecologia e linguagem (ECO-REBEL); v. 2 n. 2 (2016); 36-432447-7052reponame:Ecolinguísticainstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/erbel/article/view/9688/8556Nash, Joshuainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-07-28T06:00:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9688Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/erbelPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/erbel/oaiecorebelbrasil@gmail.com2447-70522447-7052opendoar:2019-07-28T06:00:42Ecolinguística - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is ecolinguistics necessary? |
title |
Is ecolinguistics necessary? |
spellingShingle |
Is ecolinguistics necessary? Nash, Joshua Discurso; Estudos ambientais; Epistemologia; Ecologia da língua; Teoria linguística. Discourse; Environmental Studies; Epistemology; Language Ecology; Linguistic Theory. |
title_short |
Is ecolinguistics necessary? |
title_full |
Is ecolinguistics necessary? |
title_fullStr |
Is ecolinguistics necessary? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is ecolinguistics necessary? |
title_sort |
Is ecolinguistics necessary? |
author |
Nash, Joshua |
author_facet |
Nash, Joshua |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nash, Joshua |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Discurso; Estudos ambientais; Epistemologia; Ecologia da língua; Teoria linguística. Discourse; Environmental Studies; Epistemology; Language Ecology; Linguistic Theory. |
topic |
Discurso; Estudos ambientais; Epistemologia; Ecologia da língua; Teoria linguística. Discourse; Environmental Studies; Epistemology; Language Ecology; Linguistic Theory. |
description |
This paper considers whether studies separate from more general linguistic enquiry are necessary at all if we do our general (diachronic and synchronic) nobly. The emphasis is on the eco- of ecolinguistics rather than the necessary. The argument is that the philosophical core of ecolinguistic research is far from new and exists and advances on perennial (historical) linguistic bedrock. The methodological and theoretical thrust of ecolinguistics can be posed as a logical extension of any detailed consideration of elements of analysis necessitated under what can be considered traditional general linguistics and a parameter rich sociolinguistics. It is argued the details of ecolinguistics have been, at least philosophically, addressed in earlier linguistic work, and that the fundaments of ecolinguistics ought not (necessarily) be new to linguistics and may merely be a recently developed appellative for what are recurrent concerns in linguistic science. The query is that if ecolinguistics is old (linguistic) wine freshly housed in new (ecologically focused) bottles, what do the monikers ecolinguistics and linguistic ecology as fields of research actually offer? Despite my critical position, I believe ecolinguistic studies do have a worthy contribution to make both to linguistics and to environmental studies research. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/erbel/article/view/9688 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/erbel/article/view/9688 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/erbel/article/view/9688/8556 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística (UnB-PPGL) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística (UnB-PPGL) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecolinguística: Revista brasileira de ecologia e linguagem (ECO-REBEL); Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016); 36-43 Ecolinguística: Revista brasileira de ecologia e linguagem (ECO-REBEL); v. 2 n. 2 (2016); 36-43 2447-7052 reponame:Ecolinguística instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Ecolinguística |
collection |
Ecolinguística |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ecolinguística - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ecorebelbrasil@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1792206883313942528 |