Why read (these) classics?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teixeira, Carla Costa
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Cunha, Raissa Romano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Anuário Antropológico (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/52028
Resumo: This article aims to discuss the education offered in Postgraduate Anthropology Programs (PPGA) via the documentary mapping of the “classics” indicated in the theoretical mandatory subjects of the master's degree. The scope of the research brought together the survey of two thousand and eighty-two titles indicated in Classics I and II at UnB over the years 1972-2019, and nine hundred titles that make up the syllabi of related subjects in twenty PPGA in Brazil. By analyzing this set of data, we aim to contribute to the debate surrounding the education of Brazilian anthropologists through special attention to documents, in which the notion of classic assumes materiality over the decades based on works and authors. Despite the growing disputes – in our country and elsewhere – around which authors and works should or should not be included in mandatory subjects, the document mapping process highlighted institutionalized regularities in the inclusions and exclusions of authors and works in the various PPGA in our country. From this perspective, we seek, on the one hand, to advance the understanding of the context in which this debate has taken place more recently; on the other, reflect on the use of the metaphors of “lineages”, “ancestors” and “founding fathers” to think about intellectual and theoretical ties considered central to the disciplinary field and the anthropological training of neophytes. Finally, we outline some interpretative possibilities considering the relevance of the anthropology teaching experience.
id UNB-23_4f1af001473e191fc980ec3f15579f68
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52028
network_acronym_str UNB-23
network_name_str Anuário Antropológico (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Why read (these) classics?Por que ler (esses) “clássicos”?autores classicosensino de antropologiaanalise documentalprogramas de pos-graduação em antropologia socialbrasilclassics authorsteaching of anthropologydocument analysisgraduating programs in anthropologybrazil This article aims to discuss the education offered in Postgraduate Anthropology Programs (PPGA) via the documentary mapping of the “classics” indicated in the theoretical mandatory subjects of the master's degree. The scope of the research brought together the survey of two thousand and eighty-two titles indicated in Classics I and II at UnB over the years 1972-2019, and nine hundred titles that make up the syllabi of related subjects in twenty PPGA in Brazil. By analyzing this set of data, we aim to contribute to the debate surrounding the education of Brazilian anthropologists through special attention to documents, in which the notion of classic assumes materiality over the decades based on works and authors. Despite the growing disputes – in our country and elsewhere – around which authors and works should or should not be included in mandatory subjects, the document mapping process highlighted institutionalized regularities in the inclusions and exclusions of authors and works in the various PPGA in our country. From this perspective, we seek, on the one hand, to advance the understanding of the context in which this debate has taken place more recently; on the other, reflect on the use of the metaphors of “lineages”, “ancestors” and “founding fathers” to think about intellectual and theoretical ties considered central to the disciplinary field and the anthropological training of neophytes. Finally, we outline some interpretative possibilities considering the relevance of the anthropology teaching experience. Este artigo objetiva discutir a formação obrigatória ofertada nos Programas de Pós-graduação de Antropologia (PPGA) via o mapeamento documental dos “clássicos” indicados nas disciplinas obrigatórias teóricas do mestrado. O escopo da pesquisa reuniu o levantamento de dois mil e oitenta e dois títulos indicados em Clássicos I e II na UnB ao longo dos anos de 1972-2019, e novecentos títulos que compõem as ementas de disciplinas correlatas em vinte PPGA no Brasil. Ao analisar esse conjunto de dados visamos contribuir para o debate em torno da formação dos/as antropólogos/as brasileiros/as por meio de uma atenção especial aos documentos, nos quais a noção de clássico assume materialidade ao longo das décadas a partir de obras e autores. Em que pesem as crescentes disputas – em nosso país e alhures – em torno de quais autores e obras devem ou não constar na formação obrigatória, o processo de mapeamento documental evidenciou regularidades institucionalizadas nas inclusões e exclusões de autores e obras nos diversos PPGA em nosso país. Desta perspectiva, buscamos, por um lado, avançar na compreensão do contexto em que tal debate tem se dado mais recentemente; por outro, refletir sobre o uso das metáforas de “linhagens”, “ancestrais” e “pais fundadores” para pensar laços intelectuais e teóricos considerados centrais ao campo disciplinar e à formação antropológica dos neófitos. Por fim, esboçamos algumas possibilidades interpretativas considerando a relevância da experiência de ensino da antropologia. Brasília DF: Universidade de Brasília Instituto de Ciências Sociais Departamento de Antropologia2023-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/5202810.4000/aa.11419Anuário Antropológico; Vol. 48 No. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36Anuário Antropológico; Vol. 48 Núm. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36Anuário Antropológico; Vol. 48 No. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36Anuário Antropológico; v. 48 n. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-362357-738X0102-4302reponame:Anuário Antropológico (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/52028/39115Copyright (c) 2023 Anuário Antropológicohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira, Carla CostaCunha, Raissa Romano2023-12-29T21:04:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52028Revistahttps://journals.openedition.org/aa/PUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/oairevista.anuario.antropologico@gmail.com || Revista.anuario.antropologico@gmail.com2357-738X0102-4302opendoar:2023-12-29T21:04:26Anuário Antropológico (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why read (these) classics?
Por que ler (esses) “clássicos”?
title Why read (these) classics?
spellingShingle Why read (these) classics?
Teixeira, Carla Costa
autores classicos
ensino de antropologia
analise documental
programas de pos-graduação em antropologia social
brasil
classics authors
teaching of anthropology
document analysis
graduating programs in anthropology
brazil
title_short Why read (these) classics?
title_full Why read (these) classics?
title_fullStr Why read (these) classics?
title_full_unstemmed Why read (these) classics?
title_sort Why read (these) classics?
author Teixeira, Carla Costa
author_facet Teixeira, Carla Costa
Cunha, Raissa Romano
author_role author
author2 Cunha, Raissa Romano
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teixeira, Carla Costa
Cunha, Raissa Romano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv autores classicos
ensino de antropologia
analise documental
programas de pos-graduação em antropologia social
brasil
classics authors
teaching of anthropology
document analysis
graduating programs in anthropology
brazil
topic autores classicos
ensino de antropologia
analise documental
programas de pos-graduação em antropologia social
brasil
classics authors
teaching of anthropology
document analysis
graduating programs in anthropology
brazil
description This article aims to discuss the education offered in Postgraduate Anthropology Programs (PPGA) via the documentary mapping of the “classics” indicated in the theoretical mandatory subjects of the master's degree. The scope of the research brought together the survey of two thousand and eighty-two titles indicated in Classics I and II at UnB over the years 1972-2019, and nine hundred titles that make up the syllabi of related subjects in twenty PPGA in Brazil. By analyzing this set of data, we aim to contribute to the debate surrounding the education of Brazilian anthropologists through special attention to documents, in which the notion of classic assumes materiality over the decades based on works and authors. Despite the growing disputes – in our country and elsewhere – around which authors and works should or should not be included in mandatory subjects, the document mapping process highlighted institutionalized regularities in the inclusions and exclusions of authors and works in the various PPGA in our country. From this perspective, we seek, on the one hand, to advance the understanding of the context in which this debate has taken place more recently; on the other, reflect on the use of the metaphors of “lineages”, “ancestors” and “founding fathers” to think about intellectual and theoretical ties considered central to the disciplinary field and the anthropological training of neophytes. Finally, we outline some interpretative possibilities considering the relevance of the anthropology teaching experience.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/52028
10.4000/aa.11419
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/52028
identifier_str_mv 10.4000/aa.11419
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/52028/39115
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Anuário Antropológico
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Anuário Antropológico
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brasília DF: Universidade de Brasília Instituto de Ciências Sociais Departamento de Antropologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brasília DF: Universidade de Brasília Instituto de Ciências Sociais Departamento de Antropologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anuário Antropológico; Vol. 48 No. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36
Anuário Antropológico; Vol. 48 Núm. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36
Anuário Antropológico; Vol. 48 No. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36
Anuário Antropológico; v. 48 n. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36
2357-738X
0102-4302
reponame:Anuário Antropológico (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Anuário Antropológico (Online)
collection Anuário Antropológico (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Anuário Antropológico (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.anuario.antropologico@gmail.com || Revista.anuario.antropologico@gmail.com
_version_ 1797225475369598976