Why read (these) classics?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Anuário Antropológico (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/52028 |
Resumo: | This article aims to discuss the education offered in Postgraduate Anthropology Programs (PPGA) via the documentary mapping of the “classics” indicated in the theoretical mandatory subjects of the master's degree. The scope of the research brought together the survey of two thousand and eighty-two titles indicated in Classics I and II at UnB over the years 1972-2019, and nine hundred titles that make up the syllabi of related subjects in twenty PPGA in Brazil. By analyzing this set of data, we aim to contribute to the debate surrounding the education of Brazilian anthropologists through special attention to documents, in which the notion of classic assumes materiality over the decades based on works and authors. Despite the growing disputes – in our country and elsewhere – around which authors and works should or should not be included in mandatory subjects, the document mapping process highlighted institutionalized regularities in the inclusions and exclusions of authors and works in the various PPGA in our country. From this perspective, we seek, on the one hand, to advance the understanding of the context in which this debate has taken place more recently; on the other, reflect on the use of the metaphors of “lineages”, “ancestors” and “founding fathers” to think about intellectual and theoretical ties considered central to the disciplinary field and the anthropological training of neophytes. Finally, we outline some interpretative possibilities considering the relevance of the anthropology teaching experience. |
id |
UNB-23_4f1af001473e191fc980ec3f15579f68 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52028 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-23 |
network_name_str |
Anuário Antropológico (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Why read (these) classics?Por que ler (esses) “clássicos”?autores classicosensino de antropologiaanalise documentalprogramas de pos-graduação em antropologia socialbrasilclassics authorsteaching of anthropologydocument analysisgraduating programs in anthropologybrazil This article aims to discuss the education offered in Postgraduate Anthropology Programs (PPGA) via the documentary mapping of the “classics” indicated in the theoretical mandatory subjects of the master's degree. The scope of the research brought together the survey of two thousand and eighty-two titles indicated in Classics I and II at UnB over the years 1972-2019, and nine hundred titles that make up the syllabi of related subjects in twenty PPGA in Brazil. By analyzing this set of data, we aim to contribute to the debate surrounding the education of Brazilian anthropologists through special attention to documents, in which the notion of classic assumes materiality over the decades based on works and authors. Despite the growing disputes – in our country and elsewhere – around which authors and works should or should not be included in mandatory subjects, the document mapping process highlighted institutionalized regularities in the inclusions and exclusions of authors and works in the various PPGA in our country. From this perspective, we seek, on the one hand, to advance the understanding of the context in which this debate has taken place more recently; on the other, reflect on the use of the metaphors of “lineages”, “ancestors” and “founding fathers” to think about intellectual and theoretical ties considered central to the disciplinary field and the anthropological training of neophytes. Finally, we outline some interpretative possibilities considering the relevance of the anthropology teaching experience. Este artigo objetiva discutir a formação obrigatória ofertada nos Programas de Pós-graduação de Antropologia (PPGA) via o mapeamento documental dos “clássicos” indicados nas disciplinas obrigatórias teóricas do mestrado. O escopo da pesquisa reuniu o levantamento de dois mil e oitenta e dois títulos indicados em Clássicos I e II na UnB ao longo dos anos de 1972-2019, e novecentos títulos que compõem as ementas de disciplinas correlatas em vinte PPGA no Brasil. Ao analisar esse conjunto de dados visamos contribuir para o debate em torno da formação dos/as antropólogos/as brasileiros/as por meio de uma atenção especial aos documentos, nos quais a noção de clássico assume materialidade ao longo das décadas a partir de obras e autores. Em que pesem as crescentes disputas – em nosso país e alhures – em torno de quais autores e obras devem ou não constar na formação obrigatória, o processo de mapeamento documental evidenciou regularidades institucionalizadas nas inclusões e exclusões de autores e obras nos diversos PPGA em nosso país. Desta perspectiva, buscamos, por um lado, avançar na compreensão do contexto em que tal debate tem se dado mais recentemente; por outro, refletir sobre o uso das metáforas de “linhagens”, “ancestrais” e “pais fundadores” para pensar laços intelectuais e teóricos considerados centrais ao campo disciplinar e à formação antropológica dos neófitos. Por fim, esboçamos algumas possibilidades interpretativas considerando a relevância da experiência de ensino da antropologia. Brasília DF: Universidade de Brasília Instituto de Ciências Sociais Departamento de Antropologia2023-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/5202810.4000/aa.11419Anuário Antropológico; Vol. 48 No. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36Anuário Antropológico; Vol. 48 Núm. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36Anuário Antropológico; Vol. 48 No. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36Anuário Antropológico; v. 48 n. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-362357-738X0102-4302reponame:Anuário Antropológico (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/52028/39115Copyright (c) 2023 Anuário Antropológicohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira, Carla CostaCunha, Raissa Romano2023-12-29T21:04:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52028Revistahttps://journals.openedition.org/aa/PUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/oairevista.anuario.antropologico@gmail.com || Revista.anuario.antropologico@gmail.com2357-738X0102-4302opendoar:2023-12-29T21:04:26Anuário Antropológico (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Why read (these) classics? Por que ler (esses) “clássicos”? |
title |
Why read (these) classics? |
spellingShingle |
Why read (these) classics? Teixeira, Carla Costa autores classicos ensino de antropologia analise documental programas de pos-graduação em antropologia social brasil classics authors teaching of anthropology document analysis graduating programs in anthropology brazil |
title_short |
Why read (these) classics? |
title_full |
Why read (these) classics? |
title_fullStr |
Why read (these) classics? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why read (these) classics? |
title_sort |
Why read (these) classics? |
author |
Teixeira, Carla Costa |
author_facet |
Teixeira, Carla Costa Cunha, Raissa Romano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cunha, Raissa Romano |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Carla Costa Cunha, Raissa Romano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
autores classicos ensino de antropologia analise documental programas de pos-graduação em antropologia social brasil classics authors teaching of anthropology document analysis graduating programs in anthropology brazil |
topic |
autores classicos ensino de antropologia analise documental programas de pos-graduação em antropologia social brasil classics authors teaching of anthropology document analysis graduating programs in anthropology brazil |
description |
This article aims to discuss the education offered in Postgraduate Anthropology Programs (PPGA) via the documentary mapping of the “classics” indicated in the theoretical mandatory subjects of the master's degree. The scope of the research brought together the survey of two thousand and eighty-two titles indicated in Classics I and II at UnB over the years 1972-2019, and nine hundred titles that make up the syllabi of related subjects in twenty PPGA in Brazil. By analyzing this set of data, we aim to contribute to the debate surrounding the education of Brazilian anthropologists through special attention to documents, in which the notion of classic assumes materiality over the decades based on works and authors. Despite the growing disputes – in our country and elsewhere – around which authors and works should or should not be included in mandatory subjects, the document mapping process highlighted institutionalized regularities in the inclusions and exclusions of authors and works in the various PPGA in our country. From this perspective, we seek, on the one hand, to advance the understanding of the context in which this debate has taken place more recently; on the other, reflect on the use of the metaphors of “lineages”, “ancestors” and “founding fathers” to think about intellectual and theoretical ties considered central to the disciplinary field and the anthropological training of neophytes. Finally, we outline some interpretative possibilities considering the relevance of the anthropology teaching experience. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/52028 10.4000/aa.11419 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/52028 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4000/aa.11419 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/52028/39115 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Anuário Antropológico https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Anuário Antropológico https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brasília DF: Universidade de Brasília Instituto de Ciências Sociais Departamento de Antropologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brasília DF: Universidade de Brasília Instituto de Ciências Sociais Departamento de Antropologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Anuário Antropológico; Vol. 48 No. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36 Anuário Antropológico; Vol. 48 Núm. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36 Anuário Antropológico; Vol. 48 No. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36 Anuário Antropológico; v. 48 n. 3 (2023): Anuário Antropológico; 10-36 2357-738X 0102-4302 reponame:Anuário Antropológico (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Anuário Antropológico (Online) |
collection |
Anuário Antropológico (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Anuário Antropológico (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.anuario.antropologico@gmail.com || Revista.anuario.antropologico@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797225475369598976 |