Vitruvius, Alberti and power
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | P@ranoá |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11609 |
Resumo: | The concept of Vitruvius on the ornament as an element that gives character to the building, and therefore to the city, served as the basis for the treated of Alberti.Both architects understand the ornament as compositional lines that gain legitimacy when they have a utility and a symbolic characterin architecture. Utility can be understood as an ornamental element that also responds to practical needs, such as those that ensure a civic character of the building, contributing to the city’s organization and decorum. Ornaments are theoretically determined by canons of proportion and harmony when they are thought as elements that complete the structural beauty in classical architecture. In practice, ornaments in public buildings have a compelling rhetoric and might function as a domination and legitimation tool for the ruling class. |
id |
UNB-28_869b7477e1e3187c658e4b55988e600f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11609 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-28 |
network_name_str |
P@ranoá |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Vitruvius, Alberti and powerVitrúvio, Albert e o poderVitrúvioAlbertiOrnamentoDecoroRetóricaVitruviusAlbertiOrnamentDecorumRhetoricThe concept of Vitruvius on the ornament as an element that gives character to the building, and therefore to the city, served as the basis for the treated of Alberti.Both architects understand the ornament as compositional lines that gain legitimacy when they have a utility and a symbolic characterin architecture. Utility can be understood as an ornamental element that also responds to practical needs, such as those that ensure a civic character of the building, contributing to the city’s organization and decorum. Ornaments are theoretically determined by canons of proportion and harmony when they are thought as elements that complete the structural beauty in classical architecture. In practice, ornaments in public buildings have a compelling rhetoric and might function as a domination and legitimation tool for the ruling class.O conceito de Vitrúvio sobre o ornamento enquanto elemento que confere caráter ao edifício, e consequentemente à cidade, serviu de base para o tratado de Alberti. Ambos os arquitetos entendem o ornamento como linhas compositivas que ganham legitimidade no momento em que possuem um caráter utilitário e simbólico na arquitetura. O utilitário pode ser entendido desde aqueles elementos ornamentais que também respondem a uma necessidade prática, como aqueles que asseguram um caráter cívico na edificação, contribuindo para a organização e para o decoro da cidade. Enquanto elementos que completam o belo estrutural na arquitetura clássica, os ornamentos são teoricamente determinados por cânones de proporção e harmonia. Na prática, ornamentos em edifícios públicos possuem uma retórica muitas vezes persuasiva, podendo funcionar como ferramenta de dominação e legitimação de uma classe dominante.Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo2016-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/1160910.18830/issn.1679-0944.n16.2016.15Paranoá; Vol. 9 No. 16 (2016): Poder e ManipulaçãoParanoá; v. 9 n. 16 (2016): Poder e Manipulação1679-09441677-7395reponame:P@ranoáinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11609/10219Borges, Carolina da Rocha Limainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-07T13:29:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11609Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoaPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/oaiparanoa@unb.br1679-09441677-7395opendoar:2024-02-07T13:29:31P@ranoá - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Vitruvius, Alberti and power Vitrúvio, Albert e o poder |
title |
Vitruvius, Alberti and power |
spellingShingle |
Vitruvius, Alberti and power Borges, Carolina da Rocha Lima Vitrúvio Alberti Ornamento Decoro Retórica Vitruvius Alberti Ornament Decorum Rhetoric |
title_short |
Vitruvius, Alberti and power |
title_full |
Vitruvius, Alberti and power |
title_fullStr |
Vitruvius, Alberti and power |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vitruvius, Alberti and power |
title_sort |
Vitruvius, Alberti and power |
author |
Borges, Carolina da Rocha Lima |
author_facet |
Borges, Carolina da Rocha Lima |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borges, Carolina da Rocha Lima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vitrúvio Alberti Ornamento Decoro Retórica Vitruvius Alberti Ornament Decorum Rhetoric |
topic |
Vitrúvio Alberti Ornamento Decoro Retórica Vitruvius Alberti Ornament Decorum Rhetoric |
description |
The concept of Vitruvius on the ornament as an element that gives character to the building, and therefore to the city, served as the basis for the treated of Alberti.Both architects understand the ornament as compositional lines that gain legitimacy when they have a utility and a symbolic characterin architecture. Utility can be understood as an ornamental element that also responds to practical needs, such as those that ensure a civic character of the building, contributing to the city’s organization and decorum. Ornaments are theoretically determined by canons of proportion and harmony when they are thought as elements that complete the structural beauty in classical architecture. In practice, ornaments in public buildings have a compelling rhetoric and might function as a domination and legitimation tool for the ruling class. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11609 10.18830/issn.1679-0944.n16.2016.15 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11609 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18830/issn.1679-0944.n16.2016.15 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11609/10219 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Paranoá; Vol. 9 No. 16 (2016): Poder e Manipulação Paranoá; v. 9 n. 16 (2016): Poder e Manipulação 1679-0944 1677-7395 reponame:P@ranoá instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
P@ranoá |
collection |
P@ranoá |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
P@ranoá - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
paranoa@unb.br |
_version_ |
1797066979101638656 |