The nature of the landscape between the greeks
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | P@ranoá |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11606 |
Resumo: | This paper presents a debate about the landscape thinking of the Ancient Greeks, its characteristics and limits. It’s understood that the landscape is the locus of symbolic interactions among the subject, the territory and the environment which surrounds it. It’s assumed as a lived phenomenon, and ithas its cultural significance recognized, since it surpassesthe general idea which restricts it to a visual unit and to a background distanced from the life experiences. In the Ancient Greek World, the landscape is divided into three dimensions: natural, inhabited and mythical, which are interdependent and intertwined. Its borders are clearly demarcated with á½…Ïοι ”“ boundary markers ”“ and temples in order to communicate its narratives, access modes, uses and ritualistic codes, indicating a cultural, social and political order in an undifferentiated nature. |
id |
UNB-28_da8218e667ab0b4845cf069248f0ba68 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11606 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-28 |
network_name_str |
P@ranoá |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The nature of the landscape between the greeksA natureza da paisagem entre os gregosPaisagemMitoLimiteHorosTemplos de fronteiraLandscapeMythBoundaryHorosBoundary templeThis paper presents a debate about the landscape thinking of the Ancient Greeks, its characteristics and limits. It’s understood that the landscape is the locus of symbolic interactions among the subject, the territory and the environment which surrounds it. It’s assumed as a lived phenomenon, and ithas its cultural significance recognized, since it surpassesthe general idea which restricts it to a visual unit and to a background distanced from the life experiences. In the Ancient Greek World, the landscape is divided into three dimensions: natural, inhabited and mythical, which are interdependent and intertwined. Its borders are clearly demarcated with á½…Ïοι ”“ boundary markers ”“ and temples in order to communicate its narratives, access modes, uses and ritualistic codes, indicating a cultural, social and political order in an undifferentiated nature.O artigo apresenta uma discussão sobre o pensamento da paisagem entre os antigos gregos, suas características e limites. Entende-se que a paisagem é o locus das interações simbólicas entre o sujeito, o território e o ambiente que o envolve. Assumindo-se como fenômeno vivido, tem sua significância cultural reconhecida, já que ultrapassa acepções que a restringe a uma unidade visual, um plano de fundo distanciado das experiências da vida. No mundo grego, a paisagem divide-se em três dimensões: natural, habitada e mítica, as quais são interdependentes e entrelaçadas. Suas fronteiras são claramente demarcadas com os á½…Ïοι, pedras delimitatórias e templos de fronteira, de modo a comunicar suas narrativas, acessos, usos e códigos ritualísticos, indicando uma ordem cultural, social e política em uma natureza indiferenciada.Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo2016-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/1160610.18830/issn.1679-0944.n16.2016.13Paranoá; Vol. 9 No. 16 (2016): Poder e ManipulaçãoParanoá; v. 9 n. 16 (2016): Poder e Manipulação1679-09441677-7395reponame:P@ranoáinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11606/10217Silva, Sued Ferreira dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-07T13:29:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11606Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoaPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/oaiparanoa@unb.br1679-09441677-7395opendoar:2024-02-07T13:29:31P@ranoá - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The nature of the landscape between the greeks A natureza da paisagem entre os gregos |
title |
The nature of the landscape between the greeks |
spellingShingle |
The nature of the landscape between the greeks Silva, Sued Ferreira da Paisagem Mito Limite Horos Templos de fronteira Landscape Myth Boundary Horos Boundary temple |
title_short |
The nature of the landscape between the greeks |
title_full |
The nature of the landscape between the greeks |
title_fullStr |
The nature of the landscape between the greeks |
title_full_unstemmed |
The nature of the landscape between the greeks |
title_sort |
The nature of the landscape between the greeks |
author |
Silva, Sued Ferreira da |
author_facet |
Silva, Sued Ferreira da |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Sued Ferreira da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Paisagem Mito Limite Horos Templos de fronteira Landscape Myth Boundary Horos Boundary temple |
topic |
Paisagem Mito Limite Horos Templos de fronteira Landscape Myth Boundary Horos Boundary temple |
description |
This paper presents a debate about the landscape thinking of the Ancient Greeks, its characteristics and limits. It’s understood that the landscape is the locus of symbolic interactions among the subject, the territory and the environment which surrounds it. It’s assumed as a lived phenomenon, and ithas its cultural significance recognized, since it surpassesthe general idea which restricts it to a visual unit and to a background distanced from the life experiences. In the Ancient Greek World, the landscape is divided into three dimensions: natural, inhabited and mythical, which are interdependent and intertwined. Its borders are clearly demarcated with á½…Ïοι ”“ boundary markers ”“ and temples in order to communicate its narratives, access modes, uses and ritualistic codes, indicating a cultural, social and political order in an undifferentiated nature. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11606 10.18830/issn.1679-0944.n16.2016.13 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11606 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18830/issn.1679-0944.n16.2016.13 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/11606/10217 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Paranoá; Vol. 9 No. 16 (2016): Poder e Manipulação Paranoá; v. 9 n. 16 (2016): Poder e Manipulação 1679-0944 1677-7395 reponame:P@ranoá instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
P@ranoá |
collection |
P@ranoá |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
P@ranoá - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
paranoa@unb.br |
_version_ |
1797066979098492928 |