Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Brazilian Psychology Journals Quality of systematic reviews in Psychology

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zoltowski, Ana Paula Couto
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Costa, Angelo Brandelli, Teixeira, Marco Antônio Pereira, Koller, Silvia Helena
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17635
Resumo: The aim of this study is to measure the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SR) published in Brazilian psychology journals. It was conducted a SR in SciELO and PePSIC databases, using “review” and “systematic” as keywords. 33 articles were identified and analyzed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). The mean value of quality was 5.39 (SD = 1.91) on a scale ranging from 0 to 11. Using criteria of Qualis CAPES, significant differences were found in the quality of RS published in SciELO compared to those published in PePSIC, but not according to the journal extract. No increase in quality was observed from 2001 to 2012. The adoption of guidelines for publication of SR is suggested, in order to improve their quality in Brazil.
id UNB-4_818acc859abd15cd7f356303d0f70b9b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17635
network_acronym_str UNB-4
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Brazilian Psychology Journals Quality of systematic reviews in PsychologyQualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas em periódicos de psicologia brasileirosPsicologiaRevisão sistemáticaMetodologiaSystematic reviewMethodologyQualityThe aim of this study is to measure the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SR) published in Brazilian psychology journals. It was conducted a SR in SciELO and PePSIC databases, using “review” and “systematic” as keywords. 33 articles were identified and analyzed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). The mean value of quality was 5.39 (SD = 1.91) on a scale ranging from 0 to 11. Using criteria of Qualis CAPES, significant differences were found in the quality of RS published in SciELO compared to those published in PePSIC, but not according to the journal extract. No increase in quality was observed from 2001 to 2012. The adoption of guidelines for publication of SR is suggested, in order to improve their quality in Brazil.Buscou-se avaliar a qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas (RS) publicadas em periódicos brasileiros de psicologia. Dois autores conduziram uma RS nas bases PePSIC e SciELO, usando as palavras-chave: “revisão” e “sistemática”. Foram identificados e analisados 33 artigos através do instrumento Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). A pontuação média das revisões foi 5,39 (em um escore que podia variar de 0 a 11). Houve diferença de qualidade das RS publicadas no SciELO e no PePSIC, mas não foi observada diferença conforme o estrato do periódico, segundo o Qualis CAPES. Além disso, não verificou-se incremento na qualidade das publicações de 2001 a 2012. Sugere-se adoção de diretrizes por parte dos periódicos de forma a melhorar a qualidade das RS no Brasil.Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília2014-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17635Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2014): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 97-104Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 30 Núm. 1 (2014): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 97-104Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2014): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 97-104Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 30 n. 1 (2014): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 97-1041806-34460102-3772reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17635/16147https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17635/17011Zoltowski, Ana Paula CoutoCosta, Angelo BrandelliTeixeira, Marco Antônio PereiraKoller, Silvia Helenainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-10-26T17:53:48Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17635Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/oairevistaptp@gmail.com1806-34460102-3772opendoar:2018-10-26T17:53:48Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Brazilian Psychology Journals Quality of systematic reviews in Psychology
Qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas em periódicos de psicologia brasileiros
title Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Brazilian Psychology Journals Quality of systematic reviews in Psychology
spellingShingle Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Brazilian Psychology Journals Quality of systematic reviews in Psychology
Zoltowski, Ana Paula Couto
Psicologia
Revisão sistemática
Metodologia
Systematic review
Methodology
Quality
title_short Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Brazilian Psychology Journals Quality of systematic reviews in Psychology
title_full Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Brazilian Psychology Journals Quality of systematic reviews in Psychology
title_fullStr Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Brazilian Psychology Journals Quality of systematic reviews in Psychology
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Brazilian Psychology Journals Quality of systematic reviews in Psychology
title_sort Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Brazilian Psychology Journals Quality of systematic reviews in Psychology
author Zoltowski, Ana Paula Couto
author_facet Zoltowski, Ana Paula Couto
Costa, Angelo Brandelli
Teixeira, Marco Antônio Pereira
Koller, Silvia Helena
author_role author
author2 Costa, Angelo Brandelli
Teixeira, Marco Antônio Pereira
Koller, Silvia Helena
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zoltowski, Ana Paula Couto
Costa, Angelo Brandelli
Teixeira, Marco Antônio Pereira
Koller, Silvia Helena
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Psicologia
Revisão sistemática
Metodologia
Systematic review
Methodology
Quality
topic Psicologia
Revisão sistemática
Metodologia
Systematic review
Methodology
Quality
description The aim of this study is to measure the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SR) published in Brazilian psychology journals. It was conducted a SR in SciELO and PePSIC databases, using “review” and “systematic” as keywords. 33 articles were identified and analyzed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). The mean value of quality was 5.39 (SD = 1.91) on a scale ranging from 0 to 11. Using criteria of Qualis CAPES, significant differences were found in the quality of RS published in SciELO compared to those published in PePSIC, but not according to the journal extract. No increase in quality was observed from 2001 to 2012. The adoption of guidelines for publication of SR is suggested, in order to improve their quality in Brazil.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17635
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17635
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17635/16147
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17635/17011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2014): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 97-104
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 30 Núm. 1 (2014): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 97-104
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2014): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 97-104
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 30 n. 1 (2014): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 97-104
1806-3446
0102-3772
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaptp@gmail.com
_version_ 1800211712706609152

Registros relacionados