Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2000 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UnB |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/25613 https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022 |
Resumo: | Assessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area. |
id |
UNB_1379e89927077e57807583016a45db90 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unb.br:10482/25613 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UnB |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methodsMata AtlânticaMorcegosDetector de morcegosChiropteraDiversidadeEcolocalizaçãoMétodos de amostragemRegião SudesteAssessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area.Em processamentoSociedade Brasileira de Zoologia2017-12-07T04:32:54Z2017-12-07T04:32:54Z2000info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfRev. Bras. Zool.,v.17,n.2,p.533-538,2000http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/25613https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022Portfors, Christine V.Fenton, M. BrockAguiar, Ludmilla Moura de SouzaBaumgarten, Julio E.Vonhof, Maarten J.Bouchard, SylvieFaria, Deborah M. dePedro, Wagner A.Rauntenbach, Naas I. L.Zortea, Marloninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UnBinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNB2024-08-28T19:04:07Zoai:repositorio.unb.br:10482/25613Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.unb.br/oai/requestrepositorio@unb.bropendoar:2024-08-28T19:04:07Repositório Institucional da UnB - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
title |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
spellingShingle |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods Portfors, Christine V. Mata Atlântica Morcegos Detector de morcegos Chiroptera Diversidade Ecolocalização Métodos de amostragem Região Sudeste |
title_short |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
title_full |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
title_fullStr |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
title_sort |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
author |
Portfors, Christine V. |
author_facet |
Portfors, Christine V. Fenton, M. Brock Aguiar, Ludmilla Moura de Souza Baumgarten, Julio E. Vonhof, Maarten J. Bouchard, Sylvie Faria, Deborah M. de Pedro, Wagner A. Rauntenbach, Naas I. L. Zortea, Marlon |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fenton, M. Brock Aguiar, Ludmilla Moura de Souza Baumgarten, Julio E. Vonhof, Maarten J. Bouchard, Sylvie Faria, Deborah M. de Pedro, Wagner A. Rauntenbach, Naas I. L. Zortea, Marlon |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Portfors, Christine V. Fenton, M. Brock Aguiar, Ludmilla Moura de Souza Baumgarten, Julio E. Vonhof, Maarten J. Bouchard, Sylvie Faria, Deborah M. de Pedro, Wagner A. Rauntenbach, Naas I. L. Zortea, Marlon |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mata Atlântica Morcegos Detector de morcegos Chiroptera Diversidade Ecolocalização Métodos de amostragem Região Sudeste |
topic |
Mata Atlântica Morcegos Detector de morcegos Chiroptera Diversidade Ecolocalização Métodos de amostragem Região Sudeste |
description |
Assessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area. |
publishDate |
2000 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2000 2017-12-07T04:32:54Z 2017-12-07T04:32:54Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Rev. Bras. Zool.,v.17,n.2,p.533-538,2000 http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/25613 https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022 |
identifier_str_mv |
Rev. Bras. Zool.,v.17,n.2,p.533-538,2000 |
url |
http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/25613 https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UnB instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UnB |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UnB |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UnB - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@unb.br |
_version_ |
1814508394509238272 |