Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2000 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/28336 |
Resumo: | Assessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area. |
id |
UNSP_518deeceaaee30027d61e8abd3b54dd8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/28336 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methodsAtlantic rain forestbatsbat detectorchiropteradiversityecholocationsampling methodssoutheastern BrazilAssessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area.Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine Department of NeurobiologyYork University Department of BiologyUniversidade de Brasília (UnB) Departamento de EcologiaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Departamento de Apoio, Produção e Saúde AnimalTransvaal MuseumUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar) Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Recursos NaturaisUniversidade Estadual Paulista Departamento de Apoio, Produção e Saúde AnimalSociedade Brasileira de ZoologiaNortheastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine Department of NeurobiologyYork University Department of BiologyUniversidade de Brasília (UnB)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Transvaal MuseumUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)Portfors, Christine V.Fenton, M. BrockAguiar, Ludmilla M. de S.Baumgarten, Julio E.Vonhof, Maarten J.Bouchard, SylvieFaria, Deborah M. dePedro, Wagner André [UNESP]Rauntenbach, Naas I. L.Zortea, Marlon2014-05-20T15:12:19Z2014-05-20T15:12:19Z2000-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article533-538application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 17, n. 2, p. 533-538, 2000.0101-8175http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2833610.1590/S0101-81752000000200022S0101-81752000000200022S0101-81752000000200022.pdf2685769620605055SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Zoologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-04T19:15:40Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/28336Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-04T19:15:40Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
title |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
spellingShingle |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods Portfors, Christine V. Atlantic rain forest bats bat detector chiroptera diversity echolocation sampling methods southeastern Brazil |
title_short |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
title_full |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
title_fullStr |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
title_sort |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods |
author |
Portfors, Christine V. |
author_facet |
Portfors, Christine V. Fenton, M. Brock Aguiar, Ludmilla M. de S. Baumgarten, Julio E. Vonhof, Maarten J. Bouchard, Sylvie Faria, Deborah M. de Pedro, Wagner André [UNESP] Rauntenbach, Naas I. L. Zortea, Marlon |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fenton, M. Brock Aguiar, Ludmilla M. de S. Baumgarten, Julio E. Vonhof, Maarten J. Bouchard, Sylvie Faria, Deborah M. de Pedro, Wagner André [UNESP] Rauntenbach, Naas I. L. Zortea, Marlon |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine Department of Neurobiology York University Department of Biology Universidade de Brasília (UnB) Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Transvaal Museum Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Portfors, Christine V. Fenton, M. Brock Aguiar, Ludmilla M. de S. Baumgarten, Julio E. Vonhof, Maarten J. Bouchard, Sylvie Faria, Deborah M. de Pedro, Wagner André [UNESP] Rauntenbach, Naas I. L. Zortea, Marlon |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Atlantic rain forest bats bat detector chiroptera diversity echolocation sampling methods southeastern Brazil |
topic |
Atlantic rain forest bats bat detector chiroptera diversity echolocation sampling methods southeastern Brazil |
description |
Assessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area. |
publishDate |
2000 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2000-06-01 2014-05-20T15:12:19Z 2014-05-20T15:12:19Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022 Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 17, n. 2, p. 533-538, 2000. 0101-8175 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/28336 10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022 S0101-81752000000200022 S0101-81752000000200022.pdf 2685769620605055 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/28336 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 17, n. 2, p. 533-538, 2000. 0101-8175 10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022 S0101-81752000000200022 S0101-81752000000200022.pdf 2685769620605055 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zoologia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
533-538 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1810021398687514624 |