Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UnB |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/48630 https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211037297 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-2837 |
Resumo: | Objective: To evaluate the quality of existing clinical practice guidelines for headache management and their main recommendations. Background: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines have been developed to support the clinical decision-making. However, to achieve this goal, the quality of these guidelines must be ensured. Methods: A systematic search for clinical practice guidelines for headache management was conducted in the PubMed database, in websites of known guideline developers and in websites of known headache associations. The quality appraisal was performed through the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II method. Results: Twelve guidelines were evaluated. The domains of rigor of development, applicability, and editorial independence, which most influence the overall quality of guidelines, had the lowest average scores and the highest standard deviation rates (61% 23; 37% 20; 53% 31). The main recommendations regarding medication use for acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache and migraine in adult patients consisted of paracetamol, acetylsalicylic acid, and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in all guidelines. Conclusions: The statistical results indicate that the appraised guidelines have room for both individual and collective improvement. In addition, there is a well-established medication recommendation pattern among all guidelines evaluated. |
id |
UNB_e4451d63fb9da55a5ffc15d02644b320 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unb.br:10482/48630 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UnB |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s methodDor de cabeçaCuidados de saúde baseados em evidênciasDiretrizes clínicasObjective: To evaluate the quality of existing clinical practice guidelines for headache management and their main recommendations. Background: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines have been developed to support the clinical decision-making. However, to achieve this goal, the quality of these guidelines must be ensured. Methods: A systematic search for clinical practice guidelines for headache management was conducted in the PubMed database, in websites of known guideline developers and in websites of known headache associations. The quality appraisal was performed through the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II method. Results: Twelve guidelines were evaluated. The domains of rigor of development, applicability, and editorial independence, which most influence the overall quality of guidelines, had the lowest average scores and the highest standard deviation rates (61% 23; 37% 20; 53% 31). The main recommendations regarding medication use for acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache and migraine in adult patients consisted of paracetamol, acetylsalicylic acid, and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in all guidelines. Conclusions: The statistical results indicate that the appraised guidelines have room for both individual and collective improvement. In addition, there is a well-established medication recommendation pattern among all guidelines evaluated.Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde (FS)Departamento de Farmácia (FS FAR)SAGE PublicationsUniversidade de BrasíliaUniversidade de BrasíliaUniversidade de BrasíliaUniversidade Federal de AlfenasUniversidade de BrasíliaVaz, Juliana Maria de AlbuquerqueAlves, Bárbara Manuella Cardoso SodréDuarte, Djane B.Marques, Luciene Alves MoreiraSantana, Rafael Santos2024-07-09T14:07:01Z2024-07-09T14:07:01Z2022-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleVAZ, Juliana M. A. et al. Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method. Cephalalgia, [S. l.], v.42, n. 3, p. 239-249, mar. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211037297.http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/48630https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211037297https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-2837enghttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03331024211037297info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UnBinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNB2024-07-09T14:10:39Zoai:repositorio.unb.br:10482/48630Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.unb.br/oai/requestrepositorio@unb.bropendoar:2024-07-09T14:10:39Repositório Institucional da UnB - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method |
title |
Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method |
spellingShingle |
Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method Vaz, Juliana Maria de Albuquerque Dor de cabeça Cuidados de saúde baseados em evidências Diretrizes clínicas |
title_short |
Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method |
title_full |
Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method |
title_fullStr |
Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method |
title_sort |
Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method |
author |
Vaz, Juliana Maria de Albuquerque |
author_facet |
Vaz, Juliana Maria de Albuquerque Alves, Bárbara Manuella Cardoso Sodré Duarte, Djane B. Marques, Luciene Alves Moreira Santana, Rafael Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alves, Bárbara Manuella Cardoso Sodré Duarte, Djane B. Marques, Luciene Alves Moreira Santana, Rafael Santos |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Brasília Universidade de Brasília Universidade de Brasília Universidade Federal de Alfenas Universidade de Brasília |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vaz, Juliana Maria de Albuquerque Alves, Bárbara Manuella Cardoso Sodré Duarte, Djane B. Marques, Luciene Alves Moreira Santana, Rafael Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dor de cabeça Cuidados de saúde baseados em evidências Diretrizes clínicas |
topic |
Dor de cabeça Cuidados de saúde baseados em evidências Diretrizes clínicas |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the quality of existing clinical practice guidelines for headache management and their main recommendations. Background: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines have been developed to support the clinical decision-making. However, to achieve this goal, the quality of these guidelines must be ensured. Methods: A systematic search for clinical practice guidelines for headache management was conducted in the PubMed database, in websites of known guideline developers and in websites of known headache associations. The quality appraisal was performed through the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II method. Results: Twelve guidelines were evaluated. The domains of rigor of development, applicability, and editorial independence, which most influence the overall quality of guidelines, had the lowest average scores and the highest standard deviation rates (61% 23; 37% 20; 53% 31). The main recommendations regarding medication use for acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache and migraine in adult patients consisted of paracetamol, acetylsalicylic acid, and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in all guidelines. Conclusions: The statistical results indicate that the appraised guidelines have room for both individual and collective improvement. In addition, there is a well-established medication recommendation pattern among all guidelines evaluated. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03 2024-07-09T14:07:01Z 2024-07-09T14:07:01Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
VAZ, Juliana M. A. et al. Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method. Cephalalgia, [S. l.], v.42, n. 3, p. 239-249, mar. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211037297. http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/48630 https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211037297 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-2837 |
identifier_str_mv |
VAZ, Juliana M. A. et al. Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method. Cephalalgia, [S. l.], v.42, n. 3, p. 239-249, mar. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211037297. |
url |
http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/48630 https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211037297 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-2837 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03331024211037297 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAGE Publications |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAGE Publications |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UnB instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UnB |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UnB |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UnB - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@unb.br |
_version_ |
1814508294802243584 |