Cannabis and know-medical: conflicts, controversies and disputes over an know-power in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Profanações |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/2698 |
Resumo: | Starting from a genealogy, this article aimed to make a brief analysis about the role of medical-scientific discourse in the construction of a know-power about the social uses of marijuana in Brazil. In this way, it seeks to apprehend the mechanisms of power between two points, that is, on the one hand, the rules of law that formally delimit power and, on the other hand, the truth effects that this power produces, conducts and establishes the triangle power, right and truth. It is considered that the prohibition of marijuana in Brazil constituted a seizure of power over men in the form of a governmental practice of demarcating what should or should not be done, as well as a moral and legal disciplinary power. This biopolitics implemented mechanisms to discipline and control a specific population and know-medical was a crucial knowledge-power for this. Therefore, it can be considered that the discourses of medical-scientific know continue to be relevant both for maintaining and reversing this idea of abnormality, as these discourses of know are fundamental to maintain or change this notion of abnormality around social uses of marijuana. Keywords: Cannabis. Know-Medical. Constitution. Know-power. Brazil. |
id |
UNC-0_eafe582dd4043c50c8fd04b5c4deb76d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2698 |
network_acronym_str |
UNC-0 |
network_name_str |
Profanações |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cannabis and know-medical: conflicts, controversies and disputes over an know-power in BrazilCannabis e saber-médico: conflitos, controvérsias e disputas sobre um saber-poder no BrasilStarting from a genealogy, this article aimed to make a brief analysis about the role of medical-scientific discourse in the construction of a know-power about the social uses of marijuana in Brazil. In this way, it seeks to apprehend the mechanisms of power between two points, that is, on the one hand, the rules of law that formally delimit power and, on the other hand, the truth effects that this power produces, conducts and establishes the triangle power, right and truth. It is considered that the prohibition of marijuana in Brazil constituted a seizure of power over men in the form of a governmental practice of demarcating what should or should not be done, as well as a moral and legal disciplinary power. This biopolitics implemented mechanisms to discipline and control a specific population and know-medical was a crucial knowledge-power for this. Therefore, it can be considered that the discourses of medical-scientific know continue to be relevant both for maintaining and reversing this idea of abnormality, as these discourses of know are fundamental to maintain or change this notion of abnormality around social uses of marijuana. Keywords: Cannabis. Know-Medical. Constitution. Know-power. Brazil.Partindo de uma genealogia, este artigo teve por objetivo fazer uma breve análise sobre o papel do discurso médico-científico na construção de um saber-poder sobre os usos sociais de maconha no Brasil. Desta maneira, busca-se apreender os mecanismos de poder entre dois pontos, isto é, de um lado as regras de direito que delimitam formalmente o poder e, de outro lado, os efeitos de verdade que esse poder produz, conduz e estabelece o triângulo poder, direito e verdade. Considera-se que a proibição da maconha no Brasil constituiu uma tomada de poder sobre homens na forma de uma prática governamental de demarcação sobre o que se deve ou não fazer, assim como um poder disciplinar moral e legal. Essa biopolítica implantou mecanismos para disciplinar e controlar uma população específica e o saber-médico foi um saber-poder crucial para isso. Logo, pode-se considerar que os discursos dos saberes médico-científicos continuam sendo relevantes tanto para a manutenção quanto para a reversão dessa ideia de anormalidade, pois esses discursos de saber são fundamentais para manter ou alterar essa noção de anormalidade em torno dos usos sociais de maconha. Palavras-chave: Cannabis. Saber-médico. Constituição. Saber-poder. Brasil.Universidade do Contestado (UnC)2020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/269810.24302/prof.v7i0.2698Profanações; v. 7 (2020); 148-1632358-612510.24302/prof.v7i0reponame:Profanaçõesinstname:Universidade do Contestado (UNC)instacron:UNCporhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/2698/1292Copyright (c) 2020 Profanaçõesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastro, Marco Vinicius de2020-04-25T03:41:00Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2698Revistahttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/PRIhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/oai||sandro@unc.br2358-61252358-6125opendoar:2020-04-25T03:41Profanações - Universidade do Contestado (UNC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cannabis and know-medical: conflicts, controversies and disputes over an know-power in Brazil Cannabis e saber-médico: conflitos, controvérsias e disputas sobre um saber-poder no Brasil |
title |
Cannabis and know-medical: conflicts, controversies and disputes over an know-power in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Cannabis and know-medical: conflicts, controversies and disputes over an know-power in Brazil Castro, Marco Vinicius de |
title_short |
Cannabis and know-medical: conflicts, controversies and disputes over an know-power in Brazil |
title_full |
Cannabis and know-medical: conflicts, controversies and disputes over an know-power in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Cannabis and know-medical: conflicts, controversies and disputes over an know-power in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cannabis and know-medical: conflicts, controversies and disputes over an know-power in Brazil |
title_sort |
Cannabis and know-medical: conflicts, controversies and disputes over an know-power in Brazil |
author |
Castro, Marco Vinicius de |
author_facet |
Castro, Marco Vinicius de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Castro, Marco Vinicius de |
description |
Starting from a genealogy, this article aimed to make a brief analysis about the role of medical-scientific discourse in the construction of a know-power about the social uses of marijuana in Brazil. In this way, it seeks to apprehend the mechanisms of power between two points, that is, on the one hand, the rules of law that formally delimit power and, on the other hand, the truth effects that this power produces, conducts and establishes the triangle power, right and truth. It is considered that the prohibition of marijuana in Brazil constituted a seizure of power over men in the form of a governmental practice of demarcating what should or should not be done, as well as a moral and legal disciplinary power. This biopolitics implemented mechanisms to discipline and control a specific population and know-medical was a crucial knowledge-power for this. Therefore, it can be considered that the discourses of medical-scientific know continue to be relevant both for maintaining and reversing this idea of abnormality, as these discourses of know are fundamental to maintain or change this notion of abnormality around social uses of marijuana. Keywords: Cannabis. Know-Medical. Constitution. Know-power. Brazil. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/2698 10.24302/prof.v7i0.2698 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/2698 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24302/prof.v7i0.2698 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/2698/1292 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Profanações info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Profanações |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Contestado (UnC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Contestado (UnC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Profanações; v. 7 (2020); 148-163 2358-6125 10.24302/prof.v7i0 reponame:Profanações instname:Universidade do Contestado (UNC) instacron:UNC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Contestado (UNC) |
instacron_str |
UNC |
institution |
UNC |
reponame_str |
Profanações |
collection |
Profanações |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Profanações - Universidade do Contestado (UNC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sandro@unc.br |
_version_ |
1797688250475741184 |