Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Loewe, Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Schwember, Felipe
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022
Resumo: It is often admitted that the different conceptions of liberalism are distributed along an arch at whose opposite ends stand tolerance and autonomy. In this work, we shall examine two theories which encapsulate these two polar opposites, put forth by Kukathas and Kymlicka, in order to delve into their respective Utopias. We shall sustain that, with the former (the “liberal theory of tolerance”), what is pursued is not, in fact, a Utopia but rather a libertarian dystopia. We shall also sustain that, with the latter (the “liberal theory of multiculturalism”), it can be taken to mean a Utopia in the conventional sense of the word, i.e. a political project that is impossible to put into practice. Based on our analysis and comparison of these two Utopias, we conclude that the different versions of liberalism can be interpreted as a one-of-a-kind Utopia in that it aspires to embrace communities which are actually incompatible among themselves or incompatible with the general framework of liberalism, and act as arbitrator between them. For this very reason, we shall go one step further and sustain that liberalism is, in fact, a Utopia in the sense that it seeks the impossible: that all communities give up their goal to model the State and the whole of society according to their own conception of what is good
id UNESP-10_9b6d95553632ed2b54a2728252b105df
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/8022
network_acronym_str UNESP-10
network_name_str Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka¿Tolerancia o autonomía? Dos utopías liberales de la sociedad: Kukathas y KymlickaLiberalismoUtopiáToleranciaMulticulturalismoIt is often admitted that the different conceptions of liberalism are distributed along an arch at whose opposite ends stand tolerance and autonomy. In this work, we shall examine two theories which encapsulate these two polar opposites, put forth by Kukathas and Kymlicka, in order to delve into their respective Utopias. We shall sustain that, with the former (the “liberal theory of tolerance”), what is pursued is not, in fact, a Utopia but rather a libertarian dystopia. We shall also sustain that, with the latter (the “liberal theory of multiculturalism”), it can be taken to mean a Utopia in the conventional sense of the word, i.e. a political project that is impossible to put into practice. Based on our analysis and comparison of these two Utopias, we conclude that the different versions of liberalism can be interpreted as a one-of-a-kind Utopia in that it aspires to embrace communities which are actually incompatible among themselves or incompatible with the general framework of liberalism, and act as arbitrator between them. For this very reason, we shall go one step further and sustain that liberalism is, in fact, a Utopia in the sense that it seeks the impossible: that all communities give up their goal to model the State and the whole of society according to their own conception of what is goodSe suele admitir que las diferentes concepciones del liberalismo se distribuyen a través de un arco en cuyos polos se ubican la tolerancia y la autonomía. En el presente trabajo examinaremos dos teorías que se ubican en los extremos opuestos de ese arco, la de Kukathas y la de Kymlicka, con el objeto de indagar en sus respectivas utopías. Sostendremos que de la primera, “teoría liberal de la tolerancia”, se sigue no una utopía, sino más bien una distopía libertaria. Sostendremos que la segunda, “la teoría liberal del multiculturalismo”, puede entenderse como una utopía en el sentido usual del término, es decir, como un proyecto político imposible o impracticable. Del análisis y comparación de ambas utopías concluiremos que el liberalismo, en sus distintas versiones, puede ser comprendido como una utopía sui generis, en la medida en que espera poder alojar y arbitrar entre comunidades que son incompatibles entre sí o incompatibles con el marco general del liberalismo. Por esta misma razón, sostendremos que el liberalismo es además una utopía en sentido de pretender un imposible: que todas las comunidades renuncien a sus pretensiones de modelar el Estado y el conjunto de la sociedad según sus propias concepciones del bien.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2022-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/x-mobipocket-ebookapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 44 n. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 No. 2: April-June/2021; 111-142TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 Núm. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 No. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 44 N. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-1421980-539X0101-3173reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPspahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/9049https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/9050https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/14231https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/14232Copyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLoewe, DanielSchwember, Felipe2023-05-30T06:23:34Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/8022Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptransformacao@marilia.unesp.br1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:2023-05-30T06:23:34Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka
¿Tolerancia o autonomía? Dos utopías liberales de la sociedad: Kukathas y Kymlicka
title Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka
spellingShingle Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka
Loewe, Daniel
Liberalismo
Utopiá
Tolerancia
Multiculturalismo
title_short Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka
title_full Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka
title_fullStr Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka
title_full_unstemmed Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka
title_sort Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka
author Loewe, Daniel
author_facet Loewe, Daniel
Schwember, Felipe
author_role author
author2 Schwember, Felipe
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Loewe, Daniel
Schwember, Felipe
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Liberalismo
Utopiá
Tolerancia
Multiculturalismo
topic Liberalismo
Utopiá
Tolerancia
Multiculturalismo
description It is often admitted that the different conceptions of liberalism are distributed along an arch at whose opposite ends stand tolerance and autonomy. In this work, we shall examine two theories which encapsulate these two polar opposites, put forth by Kukathas and Kymlicka, in order to delve into their respective Utopias. We shall sustain that, with the former (the “liberal theory of tolerance”), what is pursued is not, in fact, a Utopia but rather a libertarian dystopia. We shall also sustain that, with the latter (the “liberal theory of multiculturalism”), it can be taken to mean a Utopia in the conventional sense of the word, i.e. a political project that is impossible to put into practice. Based on our analysis and comparison of these two Utopias, we conclude that the different versions of liberalism can be interpreted as a one-of-a-kind Utopia in that it aspires to embrace communities which are actually incompatible among themselves or incompatible with the general framework of liberalism, and act as arbitrator between them. For this very reason, we shall go one step further and sustain that liberalism is, in fact, a Utopia in the sense that it seeks the impossible: that all communities give up their goal to model the State and the whole of society according to their own conception of what is good
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022
url https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/9049
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/9050
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/14231
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/14232
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/x-mobipocket-ebook
application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 44 n. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 No. 2: April-June/2021; 111-142
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 Núm. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 No. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 44 N. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142
1980-539X
0101-3173
reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
collection Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv transformacao@marilia.unesp.br
_version_ 1794795209802907648