Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022 |
Resumo: | It is often admitted that the different conceptions of liberalism are distributed along an arch at whose opposite ends stand tolerance and autonomy. In this work, we shall examine two theories which encapsulate these two polar opposites, put forth by Kukathas and Kymlicka, in order to delve into their respective Utopias. We shall sustain that, with the former (the “liberal theory of tolerance”), what is pursued is not, in fact, a Utopia but rather a libertarian dystopia. We shall also sustain that, with the latter (the “liberal theory of multiculturalism”), it can be taken to mean a Utopia in the conventional sense of the word, i.e. a political project that is impossible to put into practice. Based on our analysis and comparison of these two Utopias, we conclude that the different versions of liberalism can be interpreted as a one-of-a-kind Utopia in that it aspires to embrace communities which are actually incompatible among themselves or incompatible with the general framework of liberalism, and act as arbitrator between them. For this very reason, we shall go one step further and sustain that liberalism is, in fact, a Utopia in the sense that it seeks the impossible: that all communities give up their goal to model the State and the whole of society according to their own conception of what is good |
id |
UNESP-10_9b6d95553632ed2b54a2728252b105df |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/8022 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-10 |
network_name_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka¿Tolerancia o autonomía? Dos utopías liberales de la sociedad: Kukathas y KymlickaLiberalismoUtopiáToleranciaMulticulturalismoIt is often admitted that the different conceptions of liberalism are distributed along an arch at whose opposite ends stand tolerance and autonomy. In this work, we shall examine two theories which encapsulate these two polar opposites, put forth by Kukathas and Kymlicka, in order to delve into their respective Utopias. We shall sustain that, with the former (the “liberal theory of tolerance”), what is pursued is not, in fact, a Utopia but rather a libertarian dystopia. We shall also sustain that, with the latter (the “liberal theory of multiculturalism”), it can be taken to mean a Utopia in the conventional sense of the word, i.e. a political project that is impossible to put into practice. Based on our analysis and comparison of these two Utopias, we conclude that the different versions of liberalism can be interpreted as a one-of-a-kind Utopia in that it aspires to embrace communities which are actually incompatible among themselves or incompatible with the general framework of liberalism, and act as arbitrator between them. For this very reason, we shall go one step further and sustain that liberalism is, in fact, a Utopia in the sense that it seeks the impossible: that all communities give up their goal to model the State and the whole of society according to their own conception of what is goodSe suele admitir que las diferentes concepciones del liberalismo se distribuyen a través de un arco en cuyos polos se ubican la tolerancia y la autonomía. En el presente trabajo examinaremos dos teorías que se ubican en los extremos opuestos de ese arco, la de Kukathas y la de Kymlicka, con el objeto de indagar en sus respectivas utopías. Sostendremos que de la primera, “teoría liberal de la tolerancia”, se sigue no una utopía, sino más bien una distopía libertaria. Sostendremos que la segunda, “la teoría liberal del multiculturalismo”, puede entenderse como una utopía en el sentido usual del término, es decir, como un proyecto político imposible o impracticable. Del análisis y comparación de ambas utopías concluiremos que el liberalismo, en sus distintas versiones, puede ser comprendido como una utopía sui generis, en la medida en que espera poder alojar y arbitrar entre comunidades que son incompatibles entre sí o incompatibles con el marco general del liberalismo. Por esta misma razón, sostendremos que el liberalismo es además una utopía en sentido de pretender un imposible: que todas las comunidades renuncien a sus pretensiones de modelar el Estado y el conjunto de la sociedad según sus propias concepciones del bien.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2022-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/x-mobipocket-ebookapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 44 n. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 No. 2: April-June/2021; 111-142TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 Núm. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 No. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 44 N. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-1421980-539X0101-3173reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPspahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/9049https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/9050https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/14231https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/14232Copyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLoewe, DanielSchwember, Felipe2023-05-30T06:23:34Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/8022Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptransformacao@marilia.unesp.br1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:2023-05-30T06:23:34Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka ¿Tolerancia o autonomía? Dos utopías liberales de la sociedad: Kukathas y Kymlicka |
title |
Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka |
spellingShingle |
Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka Loewe, Daniel Liberalismo Utopiá Tolerancia Multiculturalismo |
title_short |
Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka |
title_full |
Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka |
title_fullStr |
Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka |
title_sort |
Tolerance or Autonomy? Two Liberal Utopias of Society: Kukathas and Kymlicka |
author |
Loewe, Daniel |
author_facet |
Loewe, Daniel Schwember, Felipe |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schwember, Felipe |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Loewe, Daniel Schwember, Felipe |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Liberalismo Utopiá Tolerancia Multiculturalismo |
topic |
Liberalismo Utopiá Tolerancia Multiculturalismo |
description |
It is often admitted that the different conceptions of liberalism are distributed along an arch at whose opposite ends stand tolerance and autonomy. In this work, we shall examine two theories which encapsulate these two polar opposites, put forth by Kukathas and Kymlicka, in order to delve into their respective Utopias. We shall sustain that, with the former (the “liberal theory of tolerance”), what is pursued is not, in fact, a Utopia but rather a libertarian dystopia. We shall also sustain that, with the latter (the “liberal theory of multiculturalism”), it can be taken to mean a Utopia in the conventional sense of the word, i.e. a political project that is impossible to put into practice. Based on our analysis and comparison of these two Utopias, we conclude that the different versions of liberalism can be interpreted as a one-of-a-kind Utopia in that it aspires to embrace communities which are actually incompatible among themselves or incompatible with the general framework of liberalism, and act as arbitrator between them. For this very reason, we shall go one step further and sustain that liberalism is, in fact, a Utopia in the sense that it seeks the impossible: that all communities give up their goal to model the State and the whole of society according to their own conception of what is good |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022 |
url |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/9049 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/9050 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/14231 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8022/14232 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/x-mobipocket-ebook application/epub+zip |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 44 n. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 No. 2: April-June/2021; 111-142 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 Núm. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 44 No. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 44 N. 2: Abril-Junho/2021; 111-142 1980-539X 0101-3173 reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
collection |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
transformacao@marilia.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1794795209802907648 |