The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Raschietti, Matteo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601
Resumo: The purpose of this paper is to highlight the importance and the legacy of the Dominican Albertus Magnus in the controversy with the defenders of the possible unity of the intellect of all mankind. To this end, a brief presentation of his treatise De unitate intellectus, written in 1263, will be given. After a historical contextualization that presents the Bishop of Regensburg’s position in relation to Averroism, it will be shown how he inspired one of his most brilliant students, Thomas Aquinas, with regard to this topic. Moreover, it is pointed out that, for the Doctor Universalis, Averroes’ contribution proved indispensable: the latter was able to indicate the correct way in which the intellect should be considered “immaterial”, although his conclusion that there was a possible single intellect for all mankind was unacceptable. Recebido: 30/12/2019Aceito: 30/12/2019
id UNESP-10_fb2d79cb9146ce80c44a6728c6ec6a70
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/9601
network_acronym_str UNESP-10
network_name_str Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect.A importância e o legado de Alberto Magno na controvérsia sobre a unicidade do intelectoAlbertus MagnusIntellectAverroismDe animaAlberto MagnoIntelectoAverroísmoDe animaThe purpose of this paper is to highlight the importance and the legacy of the Dominican Albertus Magnus in the controversy with the defenders of the possible unity of the intellect of all mankind. To this end, a brief presentation of his treatise De unitate intellectus, written in 1263, will be given. After a historical contextualization that presents the Bishop of Regensburg’s position in relation to Averroism, it will be shown how he inspired one of his most brilliant students, Thomas Aquinas, with regard to this topic. Moreover, it is pointed out that, for the Doctor Universalis, Averroes’ contribution proved indispensable: the latter was able to indicate the correct way in which the intellect should be considered “immaterial”, although his conclusion that there was a possible single intellect for all mankind was unacceptable. Recebido: 30/12/2019Aceito: 30/12/2019A finalidade deste trabalho é destacar importância e o legado do dominicano Alberto Magno na controvérsia com os defensores da unicidade do intelecto possível para todo o gênero humano. Para tanto, será feita uma apresentação sumária do seu tratado De unitate intellectus, redigido em 1263. Após uma contextualização histórica que apresenta a posição do bispo de Regensburg diante das teses averroístas, procurar-se-á mostrar como ele foi o inspirador, quanto a essa questão, de um dos seus alunos mais brilhantes: Tomás de Aquino. Além disso, deseja-se frisar como, para o Doctor Universalis, a contribuição de Averróis se revelasse indispensável: este soube indicar, com efeito, a maneira correta segundo a qual o intelecto devia ser considerado “imaterial”, embora sua conclusão da existência de um único intelecto possível para todo gênero humano fosse inaceitável. Recebido: 30/12/2019Aceito: 30/12/2019Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2022-07-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/x-mobipocket-ebookapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 42 n. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 42 No. Special Issue: Special Issue/2019; 75-92TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 42 Núm. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 42 No. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 42 N. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-921980-539X0101-3173reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/9762https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/9763https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/11530https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/11531Copyright (c) 2019 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: REVISTA DE FILOSOFIAhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRaschietti, Matteo2023-04-27T17:57:42Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/9601Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptransformacao@marilia.unesp.br1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:2023-04-27T17:57:42Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect.
A importância e o legado de Alberto Magno na controvérsia sobre a unicidade do intelecto
title The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect.
spellingShingle The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect.
Raschietti, Matteo
Albertus Magnus
Intellect
Averroism
De anima
Alberto Magno
Intelecto
Averroísmo
De anima
title_short The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect.
title_full The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect.
title_fullStr The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect.
title_full_unstemmed The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect.
title_sort The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect.
author Raschietti, Matteo
author_facet Raschietti, Matteo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Raschietti, Matteo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Albertus Magnus
Intellect
Averroism
De anima
Alberto Magno
Intelecto
Averroísmo
De anima
topic Albertus Magnus
Intellect
Averroism
De anima
Alberto Magno
Intelecto
Averroísmo
De anima
description The purpose of this paper is to highlight the importance and the legacy of the Dominican Albertus Magnus in the controversy with the defenders of the possible unity of the intellect of all mankind. To this end, a brief presentation of his treatise De unitate intellectus, written in 1263, will be given. After a historical contextualization that presents the Bishop of Regensburg’s position in relation to Averroism, it will be shown how he inspired one of his most brilliant students, Thomas Aquinas, with regard to this topic. Moreover, it is pointed out that, for the Doctor Universalis, Averroes’ contribution proved indispensable: the latter was able to indicate the correct way in which the intellect should be considered “immaterial”, although his conclusion that there was a possible single intellect for all mankind was unacceptable. Recebido: 30/12/2019Aceito: 30/12/2019
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601
url https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/9762
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/9763
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/11530
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/11531
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/x-mobipocket-ebook
application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 42 n. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 42 No. Special Issue: Special Issue/2019; 75-92
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 42 Núm. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 42 No. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 42 N. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92
1980-539X
0101-3173
reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
collection Trans/Form/Ação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv transformacao@marilia.unesp.br
_version_ 1794795209938173952