The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this paper is to highlight the importance and the legacy of the Dominican Albertus Magnus in the controversy with the defenders of the possible unity of the intellect of all mankind. To this end, a brief presentation of his treatise De unitate intellectus, written in 1263, will be given. After a historical contextualization that presents the Bishop of Regensburg’s position in relation to Averroism, it will be shown how he inspired one of his most brilliant students, Thomas Aquinas, with regard to this topic. Moreover, it is pointed out that, for the Doctor Universalis, Averroes’ contribution proved indispensable: the latter was able to indicate the correct way in which the intellect should be considered “immaterial”, although his conclusion that there was a possible single intellect for all mankind was unacceptable. Recebido: 30/12/2019Aceito: 30/12/2019 |
id |
UNESP-10_fb2d79cb9146ce80c44a6728c6ec6a70 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/9601 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-10 |
network_name_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect.A importância e o legado de Alberto Magno na controvérsia sobre a unicidade do intelectoAlbertus MagnusIntellectAverroismDe animaAlberto MagnoIntelectoAverroísmoDe animaThe purpose of this paper is to highlight the importance and the legacy of the Dominican Albertus Magnus in the controversy with the defenders of the possible unity of the intellect of all mankind. To this end, a brief presentation of his treatise De unitate intellectus, written in 1263, will be given. After a historical contextualization that presents the Bishop of Regensburg’s position in relation to Averroism, it will be shown how he inspired one of his most brilliant students, Thomas Aquinas, with regard to this topic. Moreover, it is pointed out that, for the Doctor Universalis, Averroes’ contribution proved indispensable: the latter was able to indicate the correct way in which the intellect should be considered “immaterial”, although his conclusion that there was a possible single intellect for all mankind was unacceptable. Recebido: 30/12/2019Aceito: 30/12/2019A finalidade deste trabalho é destacar importância e o legado do dominicano Alberto Magno na controvérsia com os defensores da unicidade do intelecto possível para todo o gênero humano. Para tanto, será feita uma apresentação sumária do seu tratado De unitate intellectus, redigido em 1263. Após uma contextualização histórica que apresenta a posição do bispo de Regensburg diante das teses averroístas, procurar-se-á mostrar como ele foi o inspirador, quanto a essa questão, de um dos seus alunos mais brilhantes: Tomás de Aquino. Além disso, deseja-se frisar como, para o Doctor Universalis, a contribuição de Averróis se revelasse indispensável: este soube indicar, com efeito, a maneira correta segundo a qual o intelecto devia ser considerado “imaterial”, embora sua conclusão da existência de um único intelecto possível para todo gênero humano fosse inaceitável. Recebido: 30/12/2019Aceito: 30/12/2019Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2022-07-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/x-mobipocket-ebookapplication/epub+ziphttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 42 n. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 42 No. Special Issue: Special Issue/2019; 75-92TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 42 Núm. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 42 No. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 42 N. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-921980-539X0101-3173reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/9762https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/9763https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/11530https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/11531Copyright (c) 2019 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: REVISTA DE FILOSOFIAhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRaschietti, Matteo2023-04-27T17:57:42Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/9601Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptransformacao@marilia.unesp.br1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:2023-04-27T17:57:42Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect. A importância e o legado de Alberto Magno na controvérsia sobre a unicidade do intelecto |
title |
The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect. |
spellingShingle |
The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect. Raschietti, Matteo Albertus Magnus Intellect Averroism De anima Alberto Magno Intelecto Averroísmo De anima |
title_short |
The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect. |
title_full |
The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect. |
title_fullStr |
The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect. |
title_sort |
The importance and legacy of Albertus Magnus in the controversy over the unity of the intellect. |
author |
Raschietti, Matteo |
author_facet |
Raschietti, Matteo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Raschietti, Matteo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Albertus Magnus Intellect Averroism De anima Alberto Magno Intelecto Averroísmo De anima |
topic |
Albertus Magnus Intellect Averroism De anima Alberto Magno Intelecto Averroísmo De anima |
description |
The purpose of this paper is to highlight the importance and the legacy of the Dominican Albertus Magnus in the controversy with the defenders of the possible unity of the intellect of all mankind. To this end, a brief presentation of his treatise De unitate intellectus, written in 1263, will be given. After a historical contextualization that presents the Bishop of Regensburg’s position in relation to Averroism, it will be shown how he inspired one of his most brilliant students, Thomas Aquinas, with regard to this topic. Moreover, it is pointed out that, for the Doctor Universalis, Averroes’ contribution proved indispensable: the latter was able to indicate the correct way in which the intellect should be considered “immaterial”, although his conclusion that there was a possible single intellect for all mankind was unacceptable. Recebido: 30/12/2019Aceito: 30/12/2019 |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601 |
url |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/9762 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/9763 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/11530 https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/9601/11531 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/x-mobipocket-ebook application/epub+zip |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp; v. 42 n. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 42 No. Special Issue: Special Issue/2019; 75-92 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 42 Núm. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 42 No. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; V. 42 N. Special Issue: Número Especial/2019; 75-92 1980-539X 0101-3173 reponame:Trans/Form/Ação (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
collection |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trans/Form/Ação (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
transformacao@marilia.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1794795209938173952 |