Is pomegranate peels infusion effective for disinfection of toothbrushes?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: FREIRE,Priscila Lima de Luna
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: CAMPOS,Priscila Hernández, CARVALHO,Fabíola Galbiatti, RODRIGUES,Jonas Almeida, DINIZ,Michele Baffi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000500253
Resumo: Abstract Introduction Methods of decontamination or sanitization of toothbrushes have been questioned. Objective This study assessed the effectiveness of pomegranate peels infusion as a disinfectant of toothbrushes against Streptococcus mutans. Material and method A sample of 16 schoolchildren aged between 7 and 9 years performed brushing 5 days/week, with a careful brushing once a day. After each day of brushing, the toothbrushes were washed and sprayed with one disinfectant solution. This procedure was repeated for 4 weeks using one of the different solutions per week: distilled water (G1; negative control), pomegranate (Punica granatum Linn) peels infusion (G2), 1% sodium hypochlorite (G3) and 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate (G4). After the fifth day, toothbrushes were collected for laboratory analysis. Toothbrushes heads were subjected to agitation in saline dilution of 10–1, 10–2,10–3, and 25 μL of each dilution were seeded in mitis salivarius agar culture medium for S. mutans colony-forming unit (CFU) counting. One calibrated examiner (Kappa = 0.91) performed the CFU (mL–1 × 104) counts. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn Multiple Comparison tests were used at a significance level of 5%. Result G1 presented the highest number of CFU (3.9 ± 8.4), followed by G2 (3.2 ± 4.0). No S. mutans growth was observed in G3 and G4. There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 and between G3 and G4 (p>0.05). Conclusion Pomegranate infusion was completely ineffective for the disinfection of toothbrushes against S. mutans when compared with 1% sodium hypochlorite and 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solutions.
id UNESP-16_32c9be40ceacb0970aeb565a6f90912d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1807-25772016000500253
network_acronym_str UNESP-16
network_name_str Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
repository_id_str
spelling Is pomegranate peels infusion effective for disinfection of toothbrushes?DisinfectiontoothbrushingpomegranateStreptococcus mutansAbstract Introduction Methods of decontamination or sanitization of toothbrushes have been questioned. Objective This study assessed the effectiveness of pomegranate peels infusion as a disinfectant of toothbrushes against Streptococcus mutans. Material and method A sample of 16 schoolchildren aged between 7 and 9 years performed brushing 5 days/week, with a careful brushing once a day. After each day of brushing, the toothbrushes were washed and sprayed with one disinfectant solution. This procedure was repeated for 4 weeks using one of the different solutions per week: distilled water (G1; negative control), pomegranate (Punica granatum Linn) peels infusion (G2), 1% sodium hypochlorite (G3) and 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate (G4). After the fifth day, toothbrushes were collected for laboratory analysis. Toothbrushes heads were subjected to agitation in saline dilution of 10–1, 10–2,10–3, and 25 μL of each dilution were seeded in mitis salivarius agar culture medium for S. mutans colony-forming unit (CFU) counting. One calibrated examiner (Kappa = 0.91) performed the CFU (mL–1 × 104) counts. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn Multiple Comparison tests were used at a significance level of 5%. Result G1 presented the highest number of CFU (3.9 ± 8.4), followed by G2 (3.2 ± 4.0). No S. mutans growth was observed in G3 and G4. There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 and between G3 and G4 (p>0.05). Conclusion Pomegranate infusion was completely ineffective for the disinfection of toothbrushes against S. mutans when compared with 1% sodium hypochlorite and 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solutions.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000500253Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.45 n.5 2016reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESP10.1590/1807-2577.01416info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFREIRE,Priscila Lima de LunaCAMPOS,Priscila HernándezCARVALHO,Fabíola GalbiattiRODRIGUES,Jonas AlmeidaDINIZ,Michele Baffieng2016-10-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-25772016000500253Revistahttps://www.revodontolunesp.com.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||adriana@foar.unesp.br1807-25770101-1774opendoar:2016-10-28T00:00Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is pomegranate peels infusion effective for disinfection of toothbrushes?
title Is pomegranate peels infusion effective for disinfection of toothbrushes?
spellingShingle Is pomegranate peels infusion effective for disinfection of toothbrushes?
FREIRE,Priscila Lima de Luna
Disinfection
toothbrushing
pomegranate
Streptococcus mutans
title_short Is pomegranate peels infusion effective for disinfection of toothbrushes?
title_full Is pomegranate peels infusion effective for disinfection of toothbrushes?
title_fullStr Is pomegranate peels infusion effective for disinfection of toothbrushes?
title_full_unstemmed Is pomegranate peels infusion effective for disinfection of toothbrushes?
title_sort Is pomegranate peels infusion effective for disinfection of toothbrushes?
author FREIRE,Priscila Lima de Luna
author_facet FREIRE,Priscila Lima de Luna
CAMPOS,Priscila Hernández
CARVALHO,Fabíola Galbiatti
RODRIGUES,Jonas Almeida
DINIZ,Michele Baffi
author_role author
author2 CAMPOS,Priscila Hernández
CARVALHO,Fabíola Galbiatti
RODRIGUES,Jonas Almeida
DINIZ,Michele Baffi
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv FREIRE,Priscila Lima de Luna
CAMPOS,Priscila Hernández
CARVALHO,Fabíola Galbiatti
RODRIGUES,Jonas Almeida
DINIZ,Michele Baffi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Disinfection
toothbrushing
pomegranate
Streptococcus mutans
topic Disinfection
toothbrushing
pomegranate
Streptococcus mutans
description Abstract Introduction Methods of decontamination or sanitization of toothbrushes have been questioned. Objective This study assessed the effectiveness of pomegranate peels infusion as a disinfectant of toothbrushes against Streptococcus mutans. Material and method A sample of 16 schoolchildren aged between 7 and 9 years performed brushing 5 days/week, with a careful brushing once a day. After each day of brushing, the toothbrushes were washed and sprayed with one disinfectant solution. This procedure was repeated for 4 weeks using one of the different solutions per week: distilled water (G1; negative control), pomegranate (Punica granatum Linn) peels infusion (G2), 1% sodium hypochlorite (G3) and 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate (G4). After the fifth day, toothbrushes were collected for laboratory analysis. Toothbrushes heads were subjected to agitation in saline dilution of 10–1, 10–2,10–3, and 25 μL of each dilution were seeded in mitis salivarius agar culture medium for S. mutans colony-forming unit (CFU) counting. One calibrated examiner (Kappa = 0.91) performed the CFU (mL–1 × 104) counts. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn Multiple Comparison tests were used at a significance level of 5%. Result G1 presented the highest number of CFU (3.9 ± 8.4), followed by G2 (3.2 ± 4.0). No S. mutans growth was observed in G3 and G4. There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 and between G3 and G4 (p>0.05). Conclusion Pomegranate infusion was completely ineffective for the disinfection of toothbrushes against S. mutans when compared with 1% sodium hypochlorite and 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solutions.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000500253
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000500253
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-2577.01416
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.45 n.5 2016
reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
collection Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||adriana@foar.unesp.br
_version_ 1748958559823986688