THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ANALYSES OF RENÉ DESCARTES’ COGITO
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Filosofia da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/6328 |
Resumo: | René Descartes’ Cogito is an example of a paradigmatic thought experiment, herald of both subjectivism and new science in Europe’s Modern Age, that seems to have escaped the attention of thought experiment philosophers. On deep analysis, the Cogito appears as universal instantiation (or modus ponens with implicit major ‘whatever has the property of thinking, exists’). The Cogito has strong rhetorical effects for it narratively generalizes from I to all human kind, and its historical and philosophical success can be explained from its concise enthymematic structure that rings true in many possible senses. We consider it a preeminent example of a thought experiment as it states the power of thinking as its very contents. From Descartes’ methodology of doubt we can conclude that, e.g., on a Wittgensteinian interpretation, the Cogito is a logical thought experiment rather than a psychological one. |
id |
UNESP-19_0edac88328a1447a19100a00fa0c5381 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/6328 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-19 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Filosofia da UNESP |
spelling |
THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ANALYSES OF RENÉ DESCARTES’ COGITORené Descartes’ Cogito is an example of a paradigmatic thought experiment, herald of both subjectivism and new science in Europe’s Modern Age, that seems to have escaped the attention of thought experiment philosophers. On deep analysis, the Cogito appears as universal instantiation (or modus ponens with implicit major ‘whatever has the property of thinking, exists’). The Cogito has strong rhetorical effects for it narratively generalizes from I to all human kind, and its historical and philosophical success can be explained from its concise enthymematic structure that rings true in many possible senses. We consider it a preeminent example of a thought experiment as it states the power of thinking as its very contents. From Descartes’ methodology of doubt we can conclude that, e.g., on a Wittgensteinian interpretation, the Cogito is a logical thought experiment rather than a psychological one.TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de FilosofiaTRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia2016-10-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/6328TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol 39 No 3 (2016)TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; v. 39 n. 3 (2016)0101-31730101-3173reponame:Revista de Filosofia da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttp://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/6328/4186HERTOGB, C. P.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-08-04T10:42:43Zoai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/6328Revistahttp://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/oai1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:null2020-08-04 10:42:43.977Revista de Filosofia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ANALYSES OF RENÉ DESCARTES’ COGITO |
title |
THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ANALYSES OF RENÉ DESCARTES’ COGITO |
spellingShingle |
THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ANALYSES OF RENÉ DESCARTES’ COGITO HERTOGB, C. P. |
title_short |
THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ANALYSES OF RENÉ DESCARTES’ COGITO |
title_full |
THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ANALYSES OF RENÉ DESCARTES’ COGITO |
title_fullStr |
THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ANALYSES OF RENÉ DESCARTES’ COGITO |
title_full_unstemmed |
THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ANALYSES OF RENÉ DESCARTES’ COGITO |
title_sort |
THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ANALYSES OF RENÉ DESCARTES’ COGITO |
author |
HERTOGB, C. P. |
author_facet |
HERTOGB, C. P. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
HERTOGB, C. P. |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
René Descartes’ Cogito is an example of a paradigmatic thought experiment, herald of both subjectivism and new science in Europe’s Modern Age, that seems to have escaped the attention of thought experiment philosophers. On deep analysis, the Cogito appears as universal instantiation (or modus ponens with implicit major ‘whatever has the property of thinking, exists’). The Cogito has strong rhetorical effects for it narratively generalizes from I to all human kind, and its historical and philosophical success can be explained from its concise enthymematic structure that rings true in many possible senses. We consider it a preeminent example of a thought experiment as it states the power of thinking as its very contents. From Descartes’ methodology of doubt we can conclude that, e.g., on a Wittgensteinian interpretation, the Cogito is a logical thought experiment rather than a psychological one. |
description |
René Descartes’ Cogito is an example of a paradigmatic thought experiment, herald of both subjectivism and new science in Europe’s Modern Age, that seems to have escaped the attention of thought experiment philosophers. On deep analysis, the Cogito appears as universal instantiation (or modus ponens with implicit major ‘whatever has the property of thinking, exists’). The Cogito has strong rhetorical effects for it narratively generalizes from I to all human kind, and its historical and philosophical success can be explained from its concise enthymematic structure that rings true in many possible senses. We consider it a preeminent example of a thought experiment as it states the power of thinking as its very contents. From Descartes’ methodology of doubt we can conclude that, e.g., on a Wittgensteinian interpretation, the Cogito is a logical thought experiment rather than a psychological one. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/6328 |
url |
http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/6328 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/6328/4186 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol 39 No 3 (2016) TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; v. 39 n. 3 (2016) 0101-3173 0101-3173 reponame:Revista de Filosofia da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Filosofia da UNESP |
collection |
Revista de Filosofia da UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Filosofia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1674119824421158912 |