Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SAIDEL, Matías Leandro
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629
Resumo: Giorgio Agamben and Ludwig Wittgenstein seem to have very little in common: the former is concerned with traditional ontological issues while the latter was interested in logics and ordinary language, avoiding metaphysical issues as something we cannot speak about. However, both share a crucial notion for their philosophical projects: form of life. In this paper, I try to show that, despite their different approaches and goals, form of life is for both a crucial notion for thinking ethics and life in-common. Addressing human existence in its constitutive relation to language, this notion deconstructs traditional dichotomies like bios and zoé, the cultural and the biological, enabling both authors to think of a life which cannot be separated from its forms, recognizing the commonality of logos as the specific trait of human existence. Through an analogical reading between both theoretical frameworks, I suggest that the notion of form-of-life, elaborated by Wittgenstein to address humanproduction of meaning, becomes the key notion in Agamben's affirmative thinking since it enables us to consider the common ontologically in its relation to Human potentialities and to foresee a new, common use of the world and ourselves.
id UNESP-19_1de8a11aaa26deacdfc240d91c3149e9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/3629
network_acronym_str UNESP-19
network_name_str Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
spelling Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a NotionGiorgio Agamben and Ludwig Wittgenstein seem to have very little in common: the former is concerned with traditional ontological issues while the latter was interested in logics and ordinary language, avoiding metaphysical issues as something we cannot speak about. However, both share a crucial notion for their philosophical projects: form of life. In this paper, I try to show that, despite their different approaches and goals, form of life is for both a crucial notion for thinking ethics and life in-common. Addressing human existence in its constitutive relation to language, this notion deconstructs traditional dichotomies like bios and zoé, the cultural and the biological, enabling both authors to think of a life which cannot be separated from its forms, recognizing the commonality of logos as the specific trait of human existence. Through an analogical reading between both theoretical frameworks, I suggest that the notion of form-of-life, elaborated by Wittgenstein to address humanproduction of meaning, becomes the key notion in Agamben's affirmative thinking since it enables us to consider the common ontologically in its relation to Human potentialities and to foresee a new, common use of the world and ourselves.TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de FilosofiaTRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia2014-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol 37 No 1 (2014)TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; v. 37 n. 1 (2014)0101-31730101-3173reponame:Revista de Filosofia da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttp://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629/2788SAIDEL, Matías Leandroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-08-04T10:42:38Zoai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/3629Revistahttp://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/oai1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:null2020-08-04 10:42:39.407Revista de Filosofia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
title Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
spellingShingle Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
SAIDEL, Matías Leandro
title_short Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
title_full Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
title_fullStr Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
title_full_unstemmed Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
title_sort Form(s)-of-Life. Agamben’s Reading of Wittgenstein and the Potential Uses of a Notion
author SAIDEL, Matías Leandro
author_facet SAIDEL, Matías Leandro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SAIDEL, Matías Leandro
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Giorgio Agamben and Ludwig Wittgenstein seem to have very little in common: the former is concerned with traditional ontological issues while the latter was interested in logics and ordinary language, avoiding metaphysical issues as something we cannot speak about. However, both share a crucial notion for their philosophical projects: form of life. In this paper, I try to show that, despite their different approaches and goals, form of life is for both a crucial notion for thinking ethics and life in-common. Addressing human existence in its constitutive relation to language, this notion deconstructs traditional dichotomies like bios and zoé, the cultural and the biological, enabling both authors to think of a life which cannot be separated from its forms, recognizing the commonality of logos as the specific trait of human existence. Through an analogical reading between both theoretical frameworks, I suggest that the notion of form-of-life, elaborated by Wittgenstein to address humanproduction of meaning, becomes the key notion in Agamben's affirmative thinking since it enables us to consider the common ontologically in its relation to Human potentialities and to foresee a new, common use of the world and ourselves.
description Giorgio Agamben and Ludwig Wittgenstein seem to have very little in common: the former is concerned with traditional ontological issues while the latter was interested in logics and ordinary language, avoiding metaphysical issues as something we cannot speak about. However, both share a crucial notion for their philosophical projects: form of life. In this paper, I try to show that, despite their different approaches and goals, form of life is for both a crucial notion for thinking ethics and life in-common. Addressing human existence in its constitutive relation to language, this notion deconstructs traditional dichotomies like bios and zoé, the cultural and the biological, enabling both authors to think of a life which cannot be separated from its forms, recognizing the commonality of logos as the specific trait of human existence. Through an analogical reading between both theoretical frameworks, I suggest that the notion of form-of-life, elaborated by Wittgenstein to address humanproduction of meaning, becomes the key notion in Agamben's affirmative thinking since it enables us to consider the common ontologically in its relation to Human potentialities and to foresee a new, common use of the world and ourselves.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629
url http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3629/2788
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol 37 No 1 (2014)
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; v. 37 n. 1 (2014)
0101-3173
0101-3173
reponame:Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
reponame_str Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
collection Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Filosofia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1674119823734341632