The conclusion of the deduction of taste in the dialectic of the power of judgment aesthetic in Kant

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sánchez, Manuel
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3098
Resumo: In this paper, it is argued that only in the section on dialectic in the Critique of Judgment does Kant reach a definitive and conclusive version of deduction, after discovering the concept of the supersensible. In the section on the deduction of pure aesthetic judgments, Kant does not satisfactorily explain the critical distinction between the sensible nature of humanity and the supersensible nature of human reason presupposed in the concept of universal communicability. While the concept of the supersensible illustrates this distinction, it is only through this concept that Kant that can justify the specific possibility of claiming subjective validity in taste. The priority of the solution found in the dialectic is illustrated not only by a comparative analysis of the two sections, but also by a historical reconstruction of the process of the formation of the work, which shows that the first formulation of the concept of validity coincides with the use of the concept of the supersensible.
id UNESP-19_672a8e5450817c61aa271a98983c7090
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/3098
network_acronym_str UNESP-19
network_name_str Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
spelling The conclusion of the deduction of taste in the dialectic of the power of judgment aesthetic in KantIn this paper, it is argued that only in the section on dialectic in the Critique of Judgment does Kant reach a definitive and conclusive version of deduction, after discovering the concept of the supersensible. In the section on the deduction of pure aesthetic judgments, Kant does not satisfactorily explain the critical distinction between the sensible nature of humanity and the supersensible nature of human reason presupposed in the concept of universal communicability. While the concept of the supersensible illustrates this distinction, it is only through this concept that Kant that can justify the specific possibility of claiming subjective validity in taste. The priority of the solution found in the dialectic is illustrated not only by a comparative analysis of the two sections, but also by a historical reconstruction of the process of the formation of the work, which shows that the first formulation of the concept of validity coincides with the use of the concept of the supersensible.TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de FilosofiaTRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia2013-07-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3098TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol 36 No 2 (2013)TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; v. 36 n. 2 (2013)0101-31730101-3173reponame:Revista de Filosofia da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttp://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3098/2359Sánchez, Manuelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-08-04T10:42:36Zoai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/3098Revistahttp://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/oai1980-539X0101-3173opendoar:null2020-08-04 10:42:37.827Revista de Filosofia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The conclusion of the deduction of taste in the dialectic of the power of judgment aesthetic in Kant
title The conclusion of the deduction of taste in the dialectic of the power of judgment aesthetic in Kant
spellingShingle The conclusion of the deduction of taste in the dialectic of the power of judgment aesthetic in Kant
Sánchez, Manuel
title_short The conclusion of the deduction of taste in the dialectic of the power of judgment aesthetic in Kant
title_full The conclusion of the deduction of taste in the dialectic of the power of judgment aesthetic in Kant
title_fullStr The conclusion of the deduction of taste in the dialectic of the power of judgment aesthetic in Kant
title_full_unstemmed The conclusion of the deduction of taste in the dialectic of the power of judgment aesthetic in Kant
title_sort The conclusion of the deduction of taste in the dialectic of the power of judgment aesthetic in Kant
author Sánchez, Manuel
author_facet Sánchez, Manuel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sánchez, Manuel
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this paper, it is argued that only in the section on dialectic in the Critique of Judgment does Kant reach a definitive and conclusive version of deduction, after discovering the concept of the supersensible. In the section on the deduction of pure aesthetic judgments, Kant does not satisfactorily explain the critical distinction between the sensible nature of humanity and the supersensible nature of human reason presupposed in the concept of universal communicability. While the concept of the supersensible illustrates this distinction, it is only through this concept that Kant that can justify the specific possibility of claiming subjective validity in taste. The priority of the solution found in the dialectic is illustrated not only by a comparative analysis of the two sections, but also by a historical reconstruction of the process of the formation of the work, which shows that the first formulation of the concept of validity coincides with the use of the concept of the supersensible.
description In this paper, it is argued that only in the section on dialectic in the Critique of Judgment does Kant reach a definitive and conclusive version of deduction, after discovering the concept of the supersensible. In the section on the deduction of pure aesthetic judgments, Kant does not satisfactorily explain the critical distinction between the sensible nature of humanity and the supersensible nature of human reason presupposed in the concept of universal communicability. While the concept of the supersensible illustrates this distinction, it is only through this concept that Kant that can justify the specific possibility of claiming subjective validity in taste. The priority of the solution found in the dialectic is illustrated not only by a comparative analysis of the two sections, but also by a historical reconstruction of the process of the formation of the work, which shows that the first formulation of the concept of validity coincides with the use of the concept of the supersensible.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-07-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3098
url http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3098
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3098/2359
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol 36 No 2 (2013)
TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; v. 36 n. 2 (2013)
0101-3173
0101-3173
reponame:Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
reponame_str Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
collection Revista de Filosofia da UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Filosofia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1674119823496314880