Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Science |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241 |
Resumo: | Objective: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers. Material and Methods: 96 specimens (8 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) were prepared in a metal mold using two restorative materials: CERAMAGE (Shofu, Japan) and VMLC VITA (VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany). The specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=12): G1: positive control, Mylar strip; G2: abrasive tips, Edenta system; G3: silicon tips, Enhance system; and G4: abrasive tips, Shofu system. The parameter evaluated was the average surface roughness (Ra) determined by using a profilometer SJ 301 (Mitutoyo, Japan), followed by photographic evaluation images through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with a 1000x magnification range. The data was subjected to statistical analysis for comparison between the groups (ANOVA, Tukey and Student T-tests), with a significance level of 5%. Results: there was a statistically significant difference between the silicone tip Enhance and the other groups for both ceromers with higher values of surface roughness. There was no statistically significant difference between the ceromers, except for the Shofu system, which showed lower values of surface roughness for Vita VMLC. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the Edenta and Shofu abrasive tips are more effective in reducing the surface roughness of ceromers compared with the Enhance silicone tip.Keywords: Resins; Surface roughness; Dental polishing. |
id |
UNESP-20_0e1c5cc537a2d64985c2955e213a34ba |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1241 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-20 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromersEffects of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Two CeromersObjective: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers. Material and Methods: 96 specimens (8 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) were prepared in a metal mold using two restorative materials: CERAMAGE (Shofu, Japan) and VMLC VITA (VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany). The specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=12): G1: positive control, Mylar strip; G2: abrasive tips, Edenta system; G3: silicon tips, Enhance system; and G4: abrasive tips, Shofu system. The parameter evaluated was the average surface roughness (Ra) determined by using a profilometer SJ 301 (Mitutoyo, Japan), followed by photographic evaluation images through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with a 1000x magnification range. The data was subjected to statistical analysis for comparison between the groups (ANOVA, Tukey and Student T-tests), with a significance level of 5%. Results: there was a statistically significant difference between the silicone tip Enhance and the other groups for both ceromers with higher values of surface roughness. There was no statistically significant difference between the ceromers, except for the Shofu system, which showed lower values of surface roughness for Vita VMLC. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the Edenta and Shofu abrasive tips are more effective in reducing the surface roughness of ceromers compared with the Enhance silicone tip.Keywords: Resins; Surface roughness; Dental polishing.Objective: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers. Material and Methods: 96 specimens (8 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) were prepared in a metal mold using two restorative materials: CERAMAGE (Shofu, Japan) and VMLC VITA (VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany). The specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=12): G1: positive control, Mylar strip; G2: abrasive tips, Edenta system; G3: silicon tips, Enhance system; and G4: abrasive tips, Shofu system. The parameter evaluated was the average surface roughness (Ra) determined by using a profilometer SJ 301 (Mitutoyo, Japan), followed by photographic evaluation images through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with a 1000x magnification range. The data was subjected to statistical analysis for comparison between the groups (ANOVA, Tukey and Student T-tests), with a significance level of 5%. Results: there was a statistically significant difference between the silicone tip Enhance and the other groups for both ceromers with higher values of surface roughness. There was no statistically significant difference between the ceromers, except for the Shofu system, which showed lower values of surface roughness for Vita VMLC. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the Edenta and Shofu abrasive tips are more effective in reducing the surface roughness of ceromers compared with the Enhance silicone tip.Keywords: Resins; Surface roughness; Dental polishing.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2016-07-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfimage/jpegimage/jpegapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/124110.14295/bds.2016.v19i2.1241Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2016): Apr. - Jun. / 2016 - Published June 2016; 56-63Brazilian Dental Science; v. 19 n. 2 (2016): Apr. - Jun. / 2016 - Published June 2016; 56-632178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/1028https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2610https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2611https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2612https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2613Copyright (c) 2016 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDurães, IrisMacêdo, Giulian LennonCarvalho, Cristal FernandezOliveira, Viviane Maia BarretoLima, Emilena Maria Castor Xisto2020-01-28T12:21:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1241Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:05.533355Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers Effects of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Two Ceromers |
title |
Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers |
spellingShingle |
Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers Durães, Iris |
title_short |
Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers |
title_full |
Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers |
title_fullStr |
Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers |
title_sort |
Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers |
author |
Durães, Iris |
author_facet |
Durães, Iris Macêdo, Giulian Lennon Carvalho, Cristal Fernandez Oliveira, Viviane Maia Barreto Lima, Emilena Maria Castor Xisto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Macêdo, Giulian Lennon Carvalho, Cristal Fernandez Oliveira, Viviane Maia Barreto Lima, Emilena Maria Castor Xisto |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Durães, Iris Macêdo, Giulian Lennon Carvalho, Cristal Fernandez Oliveira, Viviane Maia Barreto Lima, Emilena Maria Castor Xisto |
description |
Objective: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers. Material and Methods: 96 specimens (8 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) were prepared in a metal mold using two restorative materials: CERAMAGE (Shofu, Japan) and VMLC VITA (VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany). The specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=12): G1: positive control, Mylar strip; G2: abrasive tips, Edenta system; G3: silicon tips, Enhance system; and G4: abrasive tips, Shofu system. The parameter evaluated was the average surface roughness (Ra) determined by using a profilometer SJ 301 (Mitutoyo, Japan), followed by photographic evaluation images through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with a 1000x magnification range. The data was subjected to statistical analysis for comparison between the groups (ANOVA, Tukey and Student T-tests), with a significance level of 5%. Results: there was a statistically significant difference between the silicone tip Enhance and the other groups for both ceromers with higher values of surface roughness. There was no statistically significant difference between the ceromers, except for the Shofu system, which showed lower values of surface roughness for Vita VMLC. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the Edenta and Shofu abrasive tips are more effective in reducing the surface roughness of ceromers compared with the Enhance silicone tip.Keywords: Resins; Surface roughness; Dental polishing. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241 10.14295/bds.2016.v19i2.1241 |
url |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14295/bds.2016.v19i2.1241 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/1028 https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2610 https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2611 https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2612 https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2613 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Brazilian Dental Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Brazilian Dental Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf image/jpeg image/jpeg application/msword application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2016): Apr. - Jun. / 2016 - Published June 2016; 56-63 Brazilian Dental Science; v. 19 n. 2 (2016): Apr. - Jun. / 2016 - Published June 2016; 56-63 2178-6011 reponame:Brazilian Dental Science instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1788346899441385472 |