Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Durães, Iris
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Macêdo, Giulian Lennon, Carvalho, Cristal Fernandez, Oliveira, Viviane Maia Barreto, Lima, Emilena Maria Castor Xisto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Science
Texto Completo: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241
Resumo: Objective: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers. Material and Methods: 96 specimens (8 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) were prepared in a metal mold using two restorative materials: CERAMAGE (Shofu, Japan) and VMLC VITA (VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany). The specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=12): G1: positive control, Mylar strip; G2: abrasive tips, Edenta system; G3: silicon tips, Enhance system; and G4: abrasive tips, Shofu system. The parameter evaluated was the average surface roughness (Ra) determined by using a profilometer SJ 301 (Mitutoyo, Japan), followed by photographic evaluation images through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with a 1000x magnification range. The data was subjected to statistical analysis for comparison between the groups (ANOVA, Tukey and Student T-tests), with a significance level of 5%. Results: there was a statistically significant difference between the silicone tip Enhance and the other groups for both ceromers with higher values of surface roughness. There was no statistically significant difference between the ceromers, except for the Shofu system, which showed lower values of surface roughness for Vita VMLC. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the Edenta and Shofu abrasive tips are more effective in reducing the surface roughness of ceromers compared with the Enhance silicone tip.Keywords: Resins; Surface roughness; Dental polishing.
id UNESP-20_0e1c5cc537a2d64985c2955e213a34ba
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1241
network_acronym_str UNESP-20
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Science
repository_id_str
spelling Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromersEffects of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Two CeromersObjective: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers. Material and Methods: 96 specimens (8 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) were prepared in a metal mold using two restorative materials: CERAMAGE (Shofu, Japan) and VMLC VITA (VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany). The specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=12): G1: positive control, Mylar strip; G2: abrasive tips, Edenta system; G3: silicon tips, Enhance system; and G4: abrasive tips, Shofu system. The parameter evaluated was the average surface roughness (Ra) determined by using a profilometer SJ 301 (Mitutoyo, Japan), followed by photographic evaluation images through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with a 1000x magnification range. The data was subjected to statistical analysis for comparison between the groups (ANOVA, Tukey and Student T-tests), with a significance level of 5%. Results: there was a statistically significant difference between the silicone tip Enhance and the other groups for both ceromers with higher values of surface roughness. There was no statistically significant difference between the ceromers, except for the Shofu system, which showed lower values of surface roughness for Vita VMLC. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the Edenta and Shofu abrasive tips are more effective in reducing the surface roughness of ceromers compared with the Enhance silicone tip.Keywords: Resins; Surface roughness; Dental polishing.Objective: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers. Material and Methods: 96 specimens (8 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) were prepared in a metal mold using two restorative materials: CERAMAGE (Shofu, Japan) and VMLC VITA (VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany). The specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=12): G1: positive control, Mylar strip; G2: abrasive tips, Edenta system; G3: silicon tips, Enhance system; and G4: abrasive tips, Shofu system. The parameter evaluated was the average surface roughness (Ra) determined by using a profilometer SJ 301 (Mitutoyo, Japan), followed by photographic evaluation images through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with a 1000x magnification range. The data was subjected to statistical analysis for comparison between the groups (ANOVA, Tukey and Student T-tests), with a significance level of 5%. Results: there was a statistically significant difference between the silicone tip Enhance and the other groups for both ceromers with higher values of surface roughness. There was no statistically significant difference between the ceromers, except for the Shofu system, which showed lower values of surface roughness for Vita VMLC. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the Edenta and Shofu abrasive tips are more effective in reducing the surface roughness of ceromers compared with the Enhance silicone tip.Keywords: Resins; Surface roughness; Dental polishing.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2016-07-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfimage/jpegimage/jpegapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/124110.14295/bds.2016.v19i2.1241Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2016): Apr. - Jun. / 2016 - Published June 2016; 56-63Brazilian Dental Science; v. 19 n. 2 (2016): Apr. - Jun. / 2016 - Published June 2016; 56-632178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/1028https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2610https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2611https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2612https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2613Copyright (c) 2016 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDurães, IrisMacêdo, Giulian LennonCarvalho, Cristal FernandezOliveira, Viviane Maia BarretoLima, Emilena Maria Castor Xisto2020-01-28T12:21:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1241Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:05.533355Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers
Effects of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Two Ceromers
title Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers
spellingShingle Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers
Durães, Iris
title_short Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers
title_full Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers
title_fullStr Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers
title_full_unstemmed Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers
title_sort Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers
author Durães, Iris
author_facet Durães, Iris
Macêdo, Giulian Lennon
Carvalho, Cristal Fernandez
Oliveira, Viviane Maia Barreto
Lima, Emilena Maria Castor Xisto
author_role author
author2 Macêdo, Giulian Lennon
Carvalho, Cristal Fernandez
Oliveira, Viviane Maia Barreto
Lima, Emilena Maria Castor Xisto
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Durães, Iris
Macêdo, Giulian Lennon
Carvalho, Cristal Fernandez
Oliveira, Viviane Maia Barreto
Lima, Emilena Maria Castor Xisto
description Objective: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers. Material and Methods: 96 specimens (8 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) were prepared in a metal mold using two restorative materials: CERAMAGE (Shofu, Japan) and VMLC VITA (VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany). The specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=12): G1: positive control, Mylar strip; G2: abrasive tips, Edenta system; G3: silicon tips, Enhance system; and G4: abrasive tips, Shofu system. The parameter evaluated was the average surface roughness (Ra) determined by using a profilometer SJ 301 (Mitutoyo, Japan), followed by photographic evaluation images through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with a 1000x magnification range. The data was subjected to statistical analysis for comparison between the groups (ANOVA, Tukey and Student T-tests), with a significance level of 5%. Results: there was a statistically significant difference between the silicone tip Enhance and the other groups for both ceromers with higher values of surface roughness. There was no statistically significant difference between the ceromers, except for the Shofu system, which showed lower values of surface roughness for Vita VMLC. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the Edenta and Shofu abrasive tips are more effective in reducing the surface roughness of ceromers compared with the Enhance silicone tip.Keywords: Resins; Surface roughness; Dental polishing.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241
10.14295/bds.2016.v19i2.1241
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241
identifier_str_mv 10.14295/bds.2016.v19i2.1241
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/1028
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2610
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2611
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2612
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1241/2613
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Brazilian Dental Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Brazilian Dental Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
application/msword
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2016): Apr. - Jun. / 2016 - Published June 2016; 56-63
Brazilian Dental Science; v. 19 n. 2 (2016): Apr. - Jun. / 2016 - Published June 2016; 56-63
2178-6011
reponame:Brazilian Dental Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Science
collection Brazilian Dental Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1788346899441385472